Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby Watercooler: What's going to happen at this SANZAAR meeting?

Artist’s impression of the Australian delegates trying to decide who gets the chop (Photo: Getty Images)

There’s a lot to talk about as we head into Round 3 of Super Rugby – and Scotty Stevenson is across it all. Here’s the low down.

In the Trenches in the Tron

The Chiefs did everything in their power to reinforce their reputation as the street-corner bullies of Super Rugby last weekend. They harassed the Blues at the breakdown, almost made them cry with the kind of well-aimed, old-school verbal abuse that would make a coal miner blush, and, as has become their signature move, tackled every Blues player who got within 30 metres of the ruck, whether they had the ball or not. It was beautiful stuff; like watching a President’s Grade team filled with former gang members take on the local Marist Colts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Well, good luck pulling that shit this weekend. The Hurricanes may be famous for their flair but it’s the improvement of their forward pack (take a bow John Plumtree, Richard Watt and Dan Cron) that has been the real secret to their title success. They won’t be so easily cowed into submission in Cowtown, so to speak.

Look, we all know the ‘Canes haven’t exactly been under a lot of pressure in the opening two rounds, but what is interesting – and what makes this team a very tough proposition for the Chiefs – is their set-piece scoring conversion. Of the 24 (I mean, come on!) tries they have scored so far, nine have come from lineouts and five have come from attacking scrums. A further two have come from scrum steals, and five more from turnovers won. In other words, 21 of their 24 tries have come from messing up opposition forward packs.

For their part the Chiefs have scored 9 tries this season and wouldn’t you know it, six have come from lineouts, two from turnovers, and one from a scrum steal.

I know we could talk about almost every one-on-one match-up ahead of Friday night, but I’m picking this result boils down to an old-fashioned game of chicken. The team that blinks first in the set piece and contact areas loses.

Beaver!

Reason 243 for watching Friday’s game.

A heavy burden for the Highlanders

There once was a time when you could be committed for suggesting the Highlanders would beat the Blues at Eden Park. It was the sort of thing only a lunatic, or maybe Highlanders super-fan Steven from Dunedin, would consider. It has happened but, like finding a watchable Adam Sandler film or not losing at least one sock in the weekly wash, it remains a rare occurrence.

So uncommon is a Highlanders victory in Auckland that you can count them on one foot. Of a sloth. They have only thrice beaten the Blues at Eden Park – in 2002, 2012 and in 2015.

As if that past record wasn’t a tough enough hurdle for the Highlanders, there is also another more telling statistic that will be adding to the stress levels of the side ahead of Saturday’s showdown: Only two teams – the Bulls in 2005 and the Chiefs in 2009 – have made the playoffs after starting a season 0-3. Worse, the maximum number of losses for any New Zealand team that made the playoffs last year was four. You don’t want to be using those up this early in the season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Resilience may be a Highlanders hallmark, but with Liam Squire (knee), James Lentjes (elbow), Jason Emery (Achilles) and Ben Smith (concussion) all out or still under medical review, they will need more than that to defeat the Blues this week.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]

Bryn Gatland to the Crusaders

So let me get this straight. Now Scott Robertson can choose between starting Bryn (Hall) and Bryn (Gatland) at nine and ten, or Mitch (Drummond) and Mitch (Hunt). Well, that clears that up then.

It reminds me of a time when every name in the Crusaders backline started with ‘M’. There was Marshall, Mehrtens, Maddock, Matson, Mayerhofler, and MacDonald. The only outlier was Caleb Ralph, who decided to fit in by calling himself ‘Malfie’ instead of ‘Ralphy’.

Australia will be the stick in the mud

The SANZAAR nations meet today in Ireland to nut out the future format of the Super Rugby tournament, and it looks unlikely that Australia will budge on its desire to retain five teams in the competition.

It is understood NZ Rugby is chairing the meeting, which is reason enough for Australian CEO Bill Pulver to vehemently disagree with any suggestion his union should sacrifice anything. Australian Rugby has long taken a contrary stance to anything New Zealand Rugby has desired, and things don’t look like changing here.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Rebels – the only privately owned team in Australia (and owned by a New Zealand businessman no less) will survive the cull. Australian Rugby would be on dangerous legal grounds if they were to sell a licence only to later support the team’s removal. The Force are currently fighting a rearguard action, in much the same vein as New Zealand’s provinces did during the review of the domestic competitions several years ago: by pleading with fans to come out in numbers to home games.

The Reds and Waratahs – the heartland sides of Australia’s East Coast rugby base, will be under no threat, which leaves the Brumbies as the other team potentially for the chop. It would be an incredible move to cut the most successful Australian side in the competition’s history, but after a couple of seasons of boardroom battles and financial strain, it is very much feasible.

Odds are that Australian rugby sticks to its guns and refuses to cut a team.

That leaves the South African conference as the sacrificial lamb in this decision. That’s an incredibly weird sentence to be writing given the fact South Africa’s access to broadcast revenue and time-zone equivalence with Europe have long seen them the true power broker in the SANZAAR model.

As mentioned in the Watercooler last week, the Kings and the Cheetahs are the obvious choices to go based on a triple whammy of financial struggles, historical underperformance, and limited fan appeal.

What if Australian Rugby won’t budge?

It seems clear that the ideal result for the competition would be to return for now to a 15-team competition, which would look something like this:

New Zealand Conference: Blues, Chiefs, Hurricanes, Crusaders and Highlanders

Australian Conference: Reds, Waratahs, Brumbies, Rebels and Sunwolves

South African Conference: Bulls, Lions, Sharks, Stormers and Jaguares

If the ARU retain all five teams, a Super 16 is still a distinct possibility, but quite where that leaves the Sunwolves is anyone’s guess. The Sunwolves surely aren’t going anywhere given the revenue access they offer SANZAAR, and the Jaguares are in a much similar position in terms of building markets.

A Super 16 would be a logistical nightmare, although it is fair to say that would be nothing new for this competition.

What Australian Rugby wants, and what it needs

The Watercooler understands there are some private ownership interests in New Zealand who would rather leave Australia to their own devices and concentrate on closer ties to the South African sides. There are so many things wrong with this argument that we don’t have time to discuss them. The obvious one from a New Zealand fan point of view is the horrendous ordeal of trying to watch games at 3 am in the morning.

We have spoken to several parties in Australian rugby, all of who have close connections to the major teams. Each is adamant that for Super Rugby to grow in Australia, they must focus on derby games and the trans-Tasman rivalry factor. The clubs want the June window gone, and who could blame them? The June window is arguably the worst thing about the Super Rugby format, yet the appeal of internationals means most fans have been willing to let this preposterous schedule slide.

If Australian Rugby is serious about giving the Super Rugby competition the space it deserves, there is no use in hanging on to all five teams. This is the reality they will be grappling with today.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose star midfielder Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose midfielder
Search