Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super W expansion delayed as 2024 schedule announced

Fijiana celebrate their Super W win. Photo by Kelly Defina/Getty Images

The Super W competition won’t be expanded in 2024 with Rugby Australia instead putting resources into the women’s pathways including a new national youth competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA announced the draw for next season on Tuesday, which will again feature the five Australian teams plus Fiji Drua, who have won the past two titles, without any cross-over with New Zealand’s women’s competition.

The five-round season, plus a two-week finals series, kicks off on Friday, March 15 with the Western Force hosting the Melbourne Rebels.

Games will be mostly played as double-headers alongside the men’s Super Rugby Pacific competition.

RA said there would be additional investment into the women’s high-performance program and player development pathways, with the Next Gen Sevens evolving into the Super Rugby Women’s 7s competition and the launch of an all-new Super Rugby women’s U19 competition.

Wallaroos skipper Michaela Leonard, currently in New Zealand with Australia competing in the inaugural WXV1 tournament which features the world’s top six teams, backed RA’s plans.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallaroos and head office were in a stand-off two months ago over the disparity between the women’s and men’s programs with RA then vowing to take steps towards a fully professional future for the elite players and invest more broadly in women’s rugby across national and community competitions.

“Obviously Rome wasn’t built in a day so we’re building towards that professional element and hopefully expansion

of the Super W over the coming years,” Leonard said.

“Rugby Australia’s got some really exciting prospects moving forward over the next couple of years, and some advancements in our structure and the way people work to help us to begin to bridge that gap between where we are and professionalism.”

Related

RA boss Phil Waugh said they were committed to expanding the league when more funding was available.

ADVERTISEMENT

“While we would have loved to expand the Super W competition – and we remain committed to doing so – the reality is that the investment required to do so for 2024 would have required the removal of funding from other areas of the women’s program, such as development, the new high-performance staff and player payments,” Waugh said in a statement.

“In the near future, we will be able to share more details about the second phase of Rugby Australia’s strategic plan for the growth of the women’s game, encompassing the 2024 and 2025 seasons leading into the next Rugby World Cup in England.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search