Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We never practiced 2 yellow cards... It turned into a bit of a shambles'

By PA
Louis Lynagh /PA

Senior coach Tabai Matson felt Harlequins’ ability to take their chances was key to their 24-10 victory over Newcastle at Twickenham Stoop.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gallagher Premiership champions Quins scored four tries to the Falcons’ one to record their third win in a row, despite having less time in possession during the course of the contest.

Newcastle have now lost their last eight league games, with their profligacy laid bare during a period in the second half where Harlequins had both Luke Northmore and Danny Care in the sin bin.

Video Spacer

Le French Rugby Podcast – Episode 19

Video Spacer

Le French Rugby Podcast – Episode 19

Matson, whose side went second in the table, said: “If you told me before the game we’d be getting a 24-10 scoreline, I’d have been over the moon.

“When we got opportunities, we took them and they probably didn’t.

“They’ll probably have two or three they’ll be really disappointed with, especially when we went down to 13 men, so ‘clinical’ is a good word.

“As always, there are bits of the performance we’re pretty unhappy with and that’s a good sign. To pick up a five-point win at home and be disappointed with parts of the game proves we’re travelling well.

“We actually practiced a yellow card (situation) with Danny off during the week, but we never practiced two yellow cards.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It turned into a bit of a shambles, but we survived. That’s the main thing.

“It’s a tough old season – I think we’ve got one more home game, so a win like this just keeps us in the hunt for the top four.”

Tries from Huw Jones, Cadan Murley and Louis Lynagh allowed Harlequins to open up a 19-3 lead, with Newcastle only replying through a Will Haydon-Wood penalty.

Tom Marshall did pull back a converted try before half-time, but the only score of the second half came when Murley secured Quins their bonus point.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Newcastle head coach Dave Walder said: “We had that period when they were down to 13 men and it’s questionable whether it should have been a penalty try or not.

“A yard from the line, it’s a pretty good tackle (from Care) to stop an offload, but that’s by the by, it didn’t go our way and then from there we made a couple of poor decisions.

“Against a champion team, we conceded tries that were a bit too soft.

“We played pretty well in terms of creating things, but we just lacked a ruthless edge.

“They do things the right way with the crowd – it’s a sell-out, they engage with the fans and they play a great style of rugby.

“I thought we actually negated them at times and played some pretty good rugby ourselves, without actually finishing it off and, as a result, we paid the price.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 26 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

305 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search