Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Taine Basham scores two tries in Dragons’ narrow home defeat against Lions

By PA
Dragons RFC

Wales Number 8 Taine Basham scored two tries but that was not enough to prevent the Dragons from slipping to another narrow home defeat as they lost 23-19 to the Lions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last Saturday, the Sharks triumphed 33-30 at Rodney Parade and once again, despite Dragons outscoring their opponents by three tries to two, it was another morale-sapping defeat.

Harri Keddie scored Dragons’ opening try with Lloyd Evans converting.

Lions’ response was tries from Jarod Cairns and Quan Horn with two penalties and a conversion from Nico Steyn. Sanele Nohamba added a penalty and a conversion.

Following a lively opening, Lions took a 10th-minute lead when a break from scrum half Morne van den Berg was the catalyst for Horn to outflank the defence and score.

Dragons’ response was swift as Keddie intercepted Steyn’s telegraphed pass and showed exceptional pace to out-sprint the cover on a 70-metre run to the line.

The visitors then suffered two blows in quick succession. First lock Darrien Landsberg left the field with a back injury before hooker Franco Marais was sin-binned for booting the ball away from a ruck when in an offside position.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dragons capitalised immediately when Basham finished off a driving line-out before Steyn kicked two penalties in quick succession to give his side a 13-12 interval lead.

Two minutes after the restart, Dragons regained the lead when Basham crashed over from close range for his second try.

Evans converted but Lions kept in contention with a penalty from replacement Nohamba before Cairns brushed aside a weak tackle from Angus O’Brien to gallop 20 metres to the line.

Nohamba converted to make it 23-19 and leave the game firmly in the balance going into the final quarter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dragons replacement Will Reed missed the chance to make it a one-point game by missing an angled 30-metre penalty so Lions were able to hold on for a valuable four points.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarrior 35 minutes ago
Is this why Ireland and England struggle to win World Cups?

The assumption here is that this SA attribute was the reason for the RWC win and the failure of NH teams. I don't believe it was much of a factor at all with several other more important factors being crucial.

-Experience: Of the SA squad the number of players with a lot of experience of winning knock out RWC matches (1/4, 1/2 and finals) is enormous. NZ are not far behind. England reached a final last time. Contrasting with Ireland and France who had literally zero players with any experience of winning a knock out match. Ireland and France could of course gain experience with a QF win assuming the draw segregates the top 4 teams before the semis.

-The Draw as we know was based on rankings 4 years before and as a result Wales and England were top 4 ranked teams even though they were ranked #10, #8 respectively just before the tournament. Not only did Ireland and France get drawn in the same pools as SA and NZ but those pools were due to play eachother in the quarters. Ergo SA/NZ got to play Ire/Fra in the quarters when the latter would be most vulnerable experience wise. As Ire/Fra beat SA/NZ it can be argued that experience was a major factor compounded by the draw.

-Quality. The Top 4 seemed to be a cut above the rest with perhaps a gap apparent between NZ and France.

-Squad depth. Accumulated fatigue. Again the draw was critical here with the side having a potential France quarter and England semi being the hardest route. Lack of depth in SA squad meant that England dominated the match with the bomb squad and Pollard just about saving the day. It came down to a penalty and an element of luck was needed. England's resolve didn't break and was stronger than SA on the day. The scrum and penalties won it. That fatigue carried to the final where a point victory against 14 shows that the extra heavy matches (Scotland/England) took their toll on SA and they needed luck.


NZ/IRE/ENG/FRA no less motivated than SA.


Ireland were well aware of the unifying ability of rugby. They decided that the connection with supporters was most important to them...from all provinces. Ireland brought 60,000 fans to some matches and that was the unifying factor talked about and used by Ireland. The author was a little lazy at not doing a rudimentary check for that as Farrell and the team had said it.

31 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'If I lose my position, I lose my contract, my family won’t eat' 'If I lose my position, I lose my contract, my family won’t eat'
Search