Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

A tale of two scrums

Which lily-livered former back said the scrum was not important?

Well, I hope they were watching the All Blacks v France and Australia v Ireland Test matches this weekend.

Both games pivoted on vital scrums. The French were well and truly in the game, leading 11-8 at halftime and were playing superbly, shutting down the All Blacks across the field.

But then, their scrum was detonated in the 48thminute and it was all downhill from there. The deflation of France was quickly added to with a lineout turnover in the 49th minute and a dubious yellow card for a head high tackle in the 50th minute.

The All Blacks kicked up a gear and scored 44 unanswered points from the 52nd minute to win handsomely 52-11.  But the rot started for me when the French scrum suddenly disintegrated in the, which marked the point where Les Bleus put up the white flag.

Though not as significant as the sudden collapse of the French scrum, the Wallabies scrum in the 67th minute still proved very important.

The game was in the balance until the Wallabies literally drove back the Irish scrum at pace, completely dominating them. The Wallaby scrum, so maligned in Europe, dominating the best Northern Hemisphere had to offer.

This gave a huge lift to the players – with Ireland leading 9-8 at this stage – as the Wallabies went on to win 18-9.

Video Spacer

Credit the French for providing the blueprint for beating the All Blacks; any team playing them this year will look to that first half for guidance.

Michael Cheika will be studying this period of great French play with interest.

First of all, you must have parity in scrums, lineouts and re-starts, in which the French were rock solid.

You must then dominate the tackle area. The French first-up tackles were superb, they were driving the All Black ball carriers back behind the gain line, stopping the quick ball and shutting down their up-tempo game.

The French forwards were combative and very physical at the breakdown. Wallabies take note, the pick and go still exists and is not illegal, Les Bleus employed it with great effect.

The French rush defence from set piece and phase play paired with the big-hitting first up tackles lasted for 48 minutes, shutting down All Black attacking options and any thought of an up-tempo game.

If I was in charge of Ireland for the second test in Melbourne next weekend, I would also look to the example of the first half French performance to shut down the Wallabies.

The Irish need to limit the Wallabies width and slow their up-tempo game. They need their rush defence to be rock solid and make first-up tackles to deny reaching the gain line.

The Wallabies never attack near the ruck so the Irish just need to stack one pass off and belt the ball carrier back. The Irish also have a good lineout and can pinch some turnovers in that area.

The Irish should – like the French – load the ruck and pick and go. One pass off the ruck for 19 phases like the Brisbane test is easy to defend for the Wallabies; the Australian teams do it every weekend in Super Rugby.

As for who stood out among the Wallabies, David Pocock was superb last night.

I don’t like his politics, but he can certainly play. His 49th minute turnover was a standout and stopped a dangerous Irish attack in its tracks.

I think the disallowing of Folau’s try in the 60th minute was a disgrace and reinforces my impression that those running the game would like handbags at 10 paces for the direction of rugby.

Adam Coleman tackled a decoy runner in back play and referee Marius van der Westhuizen deemed it dangerous play. The incident had no effect on the try and it is debatable whether it was dangerous. A woeful decision and no doubt would have features in the news if the Wallabies had lost.

Next week in Melbourne is the second test, where the Irish will be looking to level the series.

The Irish will do their homework and come back stronger; I’m predicting a very tight game again and one that will be hard to pick.

The All Blacks take on France in Wellington next weekend for their second test, where I think they will pile on a half-century once again.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search