Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Tevita Kuridrani to miss Super Rugby AU qualifying final as one of three suspended Wallabies

Australian centre Tevita Kuridrani wearing the Wallabies indigenous jersey. (Photo by Koki Nagahama / Getty Images)

Former Wallabies midfielder Tevita Kuridrani will miss this week’s Super Rugby AU qualifying final after being handed a three-week suspension for a dangerous tackle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kuridrani started in the Western Force’s shock 30-27 victory over the previously unbeaten Queensland Reds at HBF Park in Perth on Friday, but was yellow carded in just the second minute of the match for a spear tackle on his opposite Hunter Paisami.

Lifting the six-test Australian international past the horizontal line, Kuridrani was cleared of a red card due to the fact that Paisami broke his fall with his hand, which prevented his head from hitting the ground first.

Video Spacer

Farmlands Workhorse of the Week | Super Rugby Aotearoa Rd 9

Video Spacer

Farmlands Workhorse of the Week | Super Rugby Aotearoa Rd 9

However, that hasn’t saved Kuridrani from the SANZAAR foul play review committee, who deemed that he had contravened Law 9.18: A player must not lift an opponent off the ground and drop or drive that player so that their head and/or upper body make contact with the ground.

As a result, the 61-test international, who hasn’t played for the Wallabies since the 2019 World Cup, has been banned for three weeks, with his early guilty plea and good judicial record preventing the committee from handing down a full six-week ban.

It means Kuridrani will miss the Force’s historic match against his former side, the Brumbies, in Canberra this Saturday as the Western Australian franchise partake in their first-ever play-off match in their history.

Furthermore, the 30-year-old will miss next week’s Super Rugby AU final – should the Force qualify for it – against the Reds in Brisbane and the following week’s Super Rugby Trans-Tasman clash against the Chiefs in Perth.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the event the Force fail to qualify for the Super Rugby AU final, the SANZAAR foul play review committee has reserved the right to extend Kuridrani’s ban to the Force’s May 21 match against the Highlanders in Perth.

Kuridrani is one of three Wallabies to have been handed bans by SANZAAR following the latest round of Super Rugby AU.

Melbourne Rebels duo Isi Naisarani and Pone Fa’amausili will also sit out the next three weeks of action after picking up red cards in their side’s 36-25 win over the Waratahs in Sydney on Saturday.

The Rebels finished the match with just 13 men on the field, with eight-test Naisarani the first to be sent from the field for a high tackle on Waratahs lock Murray Douglas in the 20th minute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Under the new red card law being used in Super Rugby Aotearoa and Super Rugby AU, Naisarani was replaced after 20 minutes on the sideline, but Melbourne’s disciplinary troubles didn’t end there.

Reserve hooker James Hanson was then yellow carded in the 75th minute for not rolling away from a breakdown, before Fa’amausili, the uncapped prop who was named in last year’s Wallabies squad for the Bledisloe Cup and Tri Nations, was red carded for another high tackle on Douglas just two minutes later.

Similarly to Kuridrani, both Naisarani and Fa’amausili pleaded guilty for their indiscretions and have clean judicial records, meaning they each avoided a full six-week sanction.

Because the Rebels didn’t qualify for the Super Rugby AU play-offs, Naisarani’s and Fa’amausili’s bans will extend to the grassroots level of the game.

As such, they will be unavailable for their Dewar Shield clubs – Endeavour Hills and Moorabbin, respectively – for the next fortnight.

They will also be banned from the Rebels’ first Super Rugby Trans-Tasman match against the Blues in Melbourne on May 15.

Listen to the latest episode of the Aotearoa Rugby Pod below:

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search