Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'That hurts': Blues determined to avoid repeat of 2018 Rebels loss at Eden Park

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

It’s been four years since the Blues were stunned by the Melbourne Rebels in front of their home fans, but the Aucklanders haven’t forgotten about that dark day in their recent history.

ADVERTISEMENT

During a dismal 2018 Super Rugby campaign that saw them finish ahead of only the last-placed Sunwolves, the Blues suffered the ignominy of losing to the Rebels in a 20-10 defeat in front of a dire Eden Park crowd of little more than 6000.

That round 16 loss was the first time the Blues had ever been beaten by the Rebels on their own turf, but it was the way in which the proud franchise seemingly went down without pulling a punch that stung the most.

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 12

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 12

It’s for that reason that Blues assistant coach Dan Halangahu has ensured that his players haven’t forget that result as they head into their first match against the Rebels in Auckland since that match four years ago.

“They’re one of the few teams that can boast about travelling across the ditch and having a win at Eden Park, so that’s in our memory as well, that the Rebels have come here and had success, and that hurts,” Halangahu said on Wednesday.

“That hurts our team, and we have a recent history of a team that has one over us, so we’ll be going out there to correct that.”

Halangahu’s comments are timely given the Crusaders were on the losing end of a shock result that saw the Waratahs pick up a rare win over the Christchurch-based franchise last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

That same round, the Brumbies outclassed the Hurricanes in Canberra while the Rebels did enough to topple Moana Pasifika in Melbourne.

All in all, the Australian sides proved their competitiveness in the most recent round of Super Rugby Pacific action, as exemplified by the fact that the Reds and Force were both within four points or less of wins over the Chiefs and Blues, respectively.

This Friday’s fixture between the Blues and Rebels shapes as a more imbalanced one, though, given the hosts are riding high at the top of the Super Rugby Pacific table after nine wins on the trot.

The Blues also emerged victorious the last time they faced the Rebels, trouncing them 50-3 at AAMI Park in Melbourne to open their title-winning Super Rugby Trans-Tasman series last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Therefore, they are heavy favourites to deliver a similarly emphatic win over their Australian counterparts, but Halangahu believes the Rebels, and the Australian franchises as a whole, deserve far more credit than they have been given.

Related

“We’re not looking at the table, we’re not looking at who’s to come. We’re respecting what the Rebels have done. They’ve been a team that has pushed sides,” he said.

“Over the recent weeks, they’ve been really unlucky in a couple of their performances against some of the powerhouses that you mentioned, the Brumbies and the Reds.

“They’ve been unlucky in a number of games, so we know that them and themselves is an occasion.”

Despite their poor record this year, registering just three wins from 10 matches to find themselves in eighth place and 25 points astray from the Blues, Halangahu said the Rebels are more than capable of punishing his side.

He made note of their mauling prowess, spearheaded by the likes of Wallabies locks Matt Philip and Rob Leota, as well as the long range goal-kicking accuracy of Wallabies utility back Reece Hodge.

Halangahu said if the Blues don’t improve the ill-discipline they were guilty of in their last two matches against the Fijian Drua and Western Force, the Rebels could easily use either of those facets of their game as weapons to score from.

“I think the first one, which is part of the game that all rugby lovers are obsessed about at the moment, is the maul,” he said of the threats the Rebels pose.

“They scored maul tries and they’ve stopped maul tries, so it’s a huge part of the game, as much as Marshy [Justin Marshall] wishes it wasn’t.

“We know it’s a huge part of the game and it’s where they’ve had success, so I know these big boys, I’m sure they’ve spent a lot of time doing things that I don’t quite understand this week. That’s one thing.

“Outside of that, they’ve got a few world-class backs. Reece Hodge kicks the ball further than just about anyone, and he’ll punish us.

“Our discipline hasn’t been good enough, and if we do that against Hodge, they could be taking penalty shots from well inside their own half.

“Couple of key points for us is being disciplined and, if not, knowing that they’ll either go for the corner and put pressure on us at maul time, or they’ll be taking three points.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search