Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'That is Angus Bell's hand' - Whitelock try leaves fans irate

The official mull over Sam Whitelock's try. Credit: Stan Sport

A contentious try by veteran second row Sam Whitelock has left many fans scratching their heads after the All Blacks defeated the Wallabies in Auckland on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a big turnaround from last week’s epic Bledisloe drama in Melbourne, the men in black romped to a relatively easy 40-14 victory at Eden Park.

Yet Whitelock’s try still rankled as many believe it was a Wallaby that grounded the ball and not the 6’8 All Black. Irish referee Andrew Brace on-field decision was that the try was good and he referred it to Welsh TMO Ben Whitehouse, who made the call that there was no reason not to award it.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However many fans watching at home believe that it was in fact Wallaby No.8 Angus Bell’s hand that grounded the ball.

Some are even calling it the ‘first own try’ in rugby. Below is a video of the contentious touchdown.

The counter-argument being made by others is that both players were holding the ball, although from the footage it’s hard to determine who was in control of the ball when it was grounded, although Bell seemed to be getting the better of it.

Whitehouse said that they were in ‘simultaneous control’ but that the All Blacks had had possession of the ball first and that he had no ‘clear evidence’ that a try had not been scored.

ADVERTISEMENT

Others didn’t see it that way.

Fox Sports’ journalist Christy Doran wrote: “That is Angus Bell’s hand. Surely, the TMO can see this”

Australian commentator Sean Maloney Tweeted: “Best team wins no doubt, would just love for a referee on here to talk me through the law ruling around Whitelock try. Someone. Anyone. Please.”

One Wallabies fan wrote: “Angus Bell scores for NZ. That will do me. He’s a Wallaby. I’m done.”

South African rugby account Jared Wright proclaimed it the sport’s first ever own try. “Angus Bell, the first player to score an own try in test rugby?”

ADVERTISEMENT

EK Analysis saw merit in the argument that both players were holding the ball, arguing Whitelock should get the try as he never lost control.

While it might hard to argue that the try was the difference between the sides, even if Ian Foster’s side kicked on after it, it did mean helped the garner some precious points difference for New Zealand and that could be what decides this year’s Rugby Championship.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
J
John 817 days ago

It was definitely not a try and just shows how bad northern hemisphere officials are, it's as clear as day that it's a wallabies hand on the ball, refereeing has been extremely poor in these tests with most of them believing they are the center of the rugby world and not the game, it really is a shame

J
Jmann 819 days ago

Nonsense that was try

J
Jason 819 days ago

Why is this even an article. It was Whitelock’s hand. It was a try.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search