Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'That was the speech': What Harlequins inspiringly said at half-time versus Bristol

(Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

Harlequins skipper Stephan Lewies has hailed veteran Danny Care for his influence in helping the rejuvenated Londoners to qualify for their first Gallagher Premiership final since they won their one and only English league title in 2012. The scrum-half was a youthful presence in the Quins line-up nine years ago when they ambushed Leicester at Twickenham and the now 34-year-old has been rolling back the years in recent months with a sumptuous run of form that even had him touted as an outside pick for the 2021 Lions. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Harlequins looked to be serious trouble when head of rugby Paul Gustard exited the club in January but seasoned campaigners such as Care, Joe Marler and Mike Brown ensured they didn’t hit rock bottom. Instead, they embarked on an uplifting run of results during the spring and while the Newcastle-bound Brown has played his final game for the club due to suspension, the immense influence of Care and Marler was there for everyone to see during last Saturday’s incredible semi-final comeback win at Bristol. 

It’s an old-stager impact that rookie skipper Lewies has now saluted ahead of this Saturday’s final versus defending champions Exeter. “The younger lads have been phenomenal and the older heads, Danny Care has been playing like he is 22 again. 

Video Spacer

A RugbyPass All Access special on the greatest South African team of all time

Video Spacer

A RugbyPass All Access special on the greatest South African team of all time

“Marler, for a prop, was on the pitch for 94 minutes which is an absolute joke, but the big thing is the leadership group has been stepping up week in week out. They have been performing for us and that has been big,” said Lewies, who went on to explain that Care addressed the Harlequins squad some weeks ago about the 2012 title win while he was also a sounding board last year before the South African lock agreed to take over the club captaincy.

“Three weeks ago we had a chat around it. Danny stood in front of the team, told the team what it meant for him personally and then you have the likes of Nick Evans still here and all those guys, Jordan Turner-Hall. Every now and then they just drop in a little bit of what it meant for them back then and three weeks ago before the playoffs we had a big chat about it.”

Regarding the captaincy which he was given in 2020, Lewies added: “When they first asked me I was, ‘Are you guys sure?’ It was a bit of a shock. I was only here for one season when they approached me and it was a huge honour but I said I needed a day or two to think about it as regards to I am a firm believer you have to have the backing of the squad to achieve anything. I phoned Marler, Mike, Danny, a few of the boys and said, ‘Listen, I have been offered this but I won’t accept it if I don’t have your backing’. They all said they were behind me and the way they have been helping me this season has been brilliant.”

Harlequins trailed Bristol by 28 points at one stage during their semi-final but after Alex Dombrandt cut that gap by five points just before the break, Lewies soon realised that a successful comeback was on the cards. “It was quite calm. When the half-time whistle went we all jogged back in and I was running past a few of their boys and I could see their forwards were tired, breathing deeply. Really, when you are up by 28 points at half-time you are smiling and you have a buzz around you, you’re not generally tired. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“We went into the huddle, Marler spoke really well to the boys, the coaches stayed out for a little bit. I spoke and just asked the boys to believe. We said normally you get guys who are this far back saying they believe but they don’t really believe but we just said we really need everyone to believe. If everyone believes we stand a chance and then to score first after half-time. That was the speech. The coaches came in and gave us some technical stuff to work on and the rest is history.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Cape Town | Leg 1 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cornelisjohannes 11 minutes ago
Ireland player ratings vs France | 2025 Six Nations

This entire experience has been nothing short of overwhelming and deeply frustrating for me. A little over a month ago, I made a substantial investment exceeding $172,000,00 USD through an online brokerage that was recommended to me by a family friend. Initially, the situation appeared to be encouraging, with my investments showing promising growth and progress. However, everything took a dramatic and distressing turn when I attempted to withdraw my funds. Suddenly, and without any warning, the broker began to withhold my earnings. To my shock, they insisted that I pay a hefty "membership fee" of $20,000 in order to have my account unfrozen, despite the fact that I had already fulfilled all of their stated requirements. When I sought clarification and questioned their sudden demand, they responded by insisting on additional payments, without providing any clear explanation or justification for their actions. The situation escalated further when they began pressuring me to disclose the source of the funds I had invested. This demand made no sense to me; it had no relevance to my account or the transactions I had made. When I refused to comply with their intrusive request, they resorted to threats, warning me that they would blacklist me, citing that I allegedly still owed them money—despite my having paid every fee they had required. I felt utterly trapped and overwhelmed by this entire ordeal. It was during this tumultuous time that a student of mine from Arizona, who had encountered a similar predicament, suggested that I reach out to a company called BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY. She shared her own positive experience with them, explaining how they had successfully assisted her in recovering her lost funds. Encouraged by her story, I decided to take the plunge and contact BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY, holding out hope for a resolution. I am genuinely grateful that I made that decision. The team at BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY was incredibly professional, dedicated, and persistent throughout the entire recovery process. They provided me with guidance every step of the way, and thanks to their expertise and support, I was able to reclaim my full refund. I wholeheartedly encourage anyone who finds themselves in a similar unfortunate situation to consider reaching out to BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY (botnetcryptorecovery . com). They truly came to my rescue and saved me from what could have been a devastating financial loss. Email them on: ( botnetcryptorecovery  @ groupmail . com )

282 Go to comments
f
fl 44 minutes ago
Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings

I’m quite confused by your comment, but this is the way to do it:

“base this solely on what happens in the Pools. So best 4 Pool winners will play best 4 third place and assuming the top 4 pool winners progress, they will avoid eachother until the semi”

Just like they do in the champions cup.


“The problems with this is that Big teams will be encouraged to absolutely trash minnows raking up huge scores”

I actually don’t agree that this is the case.


If this method had been used to rank teams in the 2023 RWC, the ranking after the pool stages would have been:

Ireland (19 table points; 144 points difference)

Wales (19 TP; 84 PD)

France (18 TP; 178 PD)

England (18 TP; 111 PD)

New Zealand (15 TP; 206 PD)

South Africa (15 TP; 117 PD)

Argentina (14 TP)

Fiji (11 TP)


Ireland’s most dominant result was 82-8 against Romania, a smaller margin of victory than South Africa and Scotland managed against the Romanians - but Ireland still manage to get top seed. Wales’ most dominant victory was 40-6 against Australia - only Fiji recorded a smaller margin of victory in their most dominant result - and yet Wales still get 2nd seed because they got a bonus point in 3 of their 4 games. What this system rewards most of all is consistency of performance, and victory in the pool’s most difficult fixtures.


If this system had been applied in 2023 it would have arguably produced a much fairer draw, with the QF matches being:

IRE v FIJ

WAL v ARG

FRA v RSA

ENG v NZE

so New Zealand get a slightly easier fixture, and Ireland get a much easier fixture. South Africa get the same draw, but in this scenario that isn’t just bad luck - its punishment for losing to Ireland. I guess France can feel slightly hard done by, but they could have avoided South Africa if they had scored 4 tries against Uruguay.

13 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings
Search