Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'That's something we haven't seen from the French in awhile': What made these Kiwi players take notice of the power growing in Six Nations rugby

(Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images)

Despite falling short against England at Twickenham, France’s second impressive Six Nations campaign has reaffirmed their status as one of the growing powers in the international game.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 23-20 loss dented their Six Nations hopes but furthered their build towards a home World Cup in 2023.

Former Blues hooker James Parsons said there ‘was a lot to like about’ the way this French side is playing the game but came unstuck against England by chancing their arm one time too many.

Video Spacer

Richie Mo’unga’s form

Video Spacer

Richie Mo’unga’s form

“You’ve got to be impressed with the French side and where they are at, the way they like to play, their attacking style,” he said on this week’s Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

“You talk about ‘no fear’, they just throw everything at it. Potentially it was what cost them [against England] but give them a couple more years, they are going to be a genuine threat at this World Cup.”

“They are a young side, and there is a lot to like about them. And they were still within reach towards the end at 23-20. They had the ball at the end on the 22 and Dupont unfortunately knocked it on. He was exceptional on the day.”

“England fought their way back into it, they didn’t have the best start. They went back to what they know, their mauls, and Billy Vunipola I think had 18 carries. They went to what they know and got the match-winner through a man who has been under a lot of pressure in Itoje.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite a second half laden with an overbearing amount of kicking, Parsons said that it can be ‘hard’ to switch watching between Super Rugby and international rugby, but that kicking is integral at that level.

“A lot of kicking. But I think with international rugby, it is hard to go from watching Super Rugby Aotearoa where one team kicks 14 times and the other team kicks 12 times to watching international footy where you do have to have a bit more strategy.

“Both sides kicked 29 times. It is a different style, but I just think they probably won the arm wrestle and the chess match. The possession and territory stakes wore down.

“France just ended up having to make a lot more tackles in their half, and chance their arm just one too many times.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The funny thing is, they lost, but the brand of footy they are playing our natural reaction is to talk about them. And that’s nothing against England because they won the test match, but they were a joy to watch.”

Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall explained that France’s set-piece try by Damian Penaud was a sign that this French side is unlike any of recent times, and that the level of execution required to pull that off shows France are a side to be reckoned with.

“France are going to be scary come 2023, they are a young side coming on the up. You look at that second try, that special [lineout play] off the top, the return ball and having block runners, animated and down lines. That’s special.

“That’s something we haven’t seen from the French in awhile. You look at that first try, use the short side and square hands and the chip and chase with Dupont with that great ability to get one hand on it and get back inside for that try.

Hall said that despite the last play error, Dupont has been one of the best players to watch in the Six Nations.

“I feel really sorry for him, to knock on that ball. He’s just been so good in this Six Nations. For a decision like that, I’ve done it so many times in my career, sometimes it is a foot or a hand that loses the ball. Unfortunately that was the losing of the game there.

“I just think that France, they are brewing something special in that environment. Come 2023 they will be a team to watch, especially at home as well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

5 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search