Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'That's the word that sticks out': Aaron Mauger questions Moana Pasifika's mentality

(Photo by Fiona Goodall/Getty Images)

After losing to the Chiefs 71-5 in the pre-season, Moana Pasifika seemingly had made drastic improvements when they finally played their first ever Super Rugby Pacific clash against the Crusaders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Against the Aotearoa champions, Moana Pasifika had pushed the Crusaders in a competitive fixture, despite going down 33-12, that highlighted the potential of the new franchise.

Given the chance to rectify the pre-season result against the Chiefs at the same ground, Moana Pasifika ended up on the wrong end of another lopsided score by 59-12.

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 25

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 25

      In his post-match assessment of the game, head coach Aaron Mauger questioned the mentality of his side and the lack of intensity as the Chiefs ran in nine tries to two.

      “I think the big one was probably the mentality. That’s the word that sticks out. And intensity,” said Mauger.

      “We just dropped off too easy and it was like a bit of a training run at the end of the Chiefs.

      “You’ve gotta give credit to them, they put us under a lot of pressure early. Giving away so many penalties in that first half really gave them the opportunity to keep putting pressure on us and it just took a lot of energy out of us.

      “We’ve gotta be better than that. I thought we trained harder and better than that, to be fair. It was a pretty disappointing performance in the end.”

      ADVERTISEMENT

      The first half had been decent in Mauger’s view, but lamented his side’s attacking efficiency inside the opposition 22 where the Chiefs were able to repel them multiple times.

      “Yeah it had been [a good first hour of rugby]. We got opportunities to get down there and we’ve gotta nail our set-piece, gotta nail those attacks close to the line. Chiefs did well, they held us out, but we’ve got to be better,” he said.

      “If we want to be serious about competing in this competition, we’ve got to be much better in those areas.”

      Mauger believes his team is capable of much better and attributes the lack of intensity in the disruption to this week’s preparations as the side left the Queenstown bubble and returned back to families for an emotional re-union.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Moana Pasifika were the last side to leave Queenstown after staying there to play the Crusaders in Dunedin after completing isolation following an outbreak within the squad.

      “I don’t think there’s a lack of desire in this team. I think the mentality starts around your preparation. I thought we were really well set up. Our last intense rugby session was on rugby and then we’e flown back and there’s been some emotional reconnection with home and all those things which does take energy,” he said.

      “I think that certainly played a factor for us. I know our guys will be really disappointed with that because we’re so much better and the feeling within the group is we’re so much better than what we put out there tonight.

      “We know it’s in us – and we showed them it’s in us for periods in the game. But the lesson at this level is it’s gotta be on for 80 minutes.

      “What it looks like out on the field is make a tackle, roll away, get back on your feet, make a tackle, get up, go through [and] put pressure on the ball. And it’s doing that
      over and over again.

      “So when we start to cop out at times and give away easy penalties, bam, we’re defending outside our 22 and these New Zealand teams are lethal when you give them
      that many opportunities. So the scoreboard was a result of that pressure but we can be so much better.

      “I don’t think there’s a lack of desire, I think probably just somewhere in our prep over the last 48 hours, we haven’t quite been where we needed to be to set that performance up.”

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

      Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

      Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

      Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

      Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

      England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

      Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

      Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      0 Comments
      Be the first to comment...

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      P
      Poorfour 32 minutes ago
      Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

      So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


      I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


      Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


      Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

      9 Go to comments
      LONG READ
      LONG READ Can 'Tongan Thor' rediscover his strength before the Lions arrive? Can 'Tongan Thor' rediscover his strength before the Lions arrive?
      Search