Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

4 England outsiders - including uncapped Marcus Smith - said to be in contention for Lions selection on Thursday

(Photo by Jacques Feeney/MI News/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Four players unwanted by Eddie Jones’ England – including Harlequins duo Marcus Smith and Danny Care – are said to be under consideration for selection on the 2021 Lions tour by Warren Gatland. The 36-strong squad is due to be unveiled on Thursday and speculation has grown in recent days that Gatland has reportedly been assessing the merits of Smith, Care, Bath’s Ben Spencer and Exeter’s Sam Simmonds ahead of the big announcement.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith is uncapped at Test level, Care last played for England in November 2018, Spencer’s last cap came off the bench at the 2019 World Cup final while you have to go back to March 2018 to find Simmonds’ last cap. 

Despite all four being out of favour with England, whose fifth-place Guinness Six Nations finish resulted in much criticism of Jones’ selection choices, they are all apparently in the frame for Thursday’s big announcement, a discussion that began with 57 players initially considered when Gatland sat down last month for the first time with his four assistants, Gregor Townsend, Steve Tandy, Robin McBryde and Neil Jenkins.

Video Spacer

Can the Chiefs take down the Crusaders in the Super Rugby Aotearoa final?

Video Spacer

Can the Chiefs take down the Crusaders in the Super Rugby Aotearoa final?

A number of big names have since been ruled out of contention, notably ACL victims George North and Joe Launchbury while Ben Youngs has also told Gatland that he isn’t available to travel for personal reasons. 

Youngs’ unavailability quickly led to the names of Care – described last month to RugbyPass as a social glue player – and Spencer getting speculated on as potential tour picks as scrum-half isn’t a position where there is a massive depth or hugely impressive form coming out of the recent Guinness Six Nations.

An injury affected the campaign of Ireland’s Conor Murray, Wales had a revolving door at No9 due to their injury profile while Scotland’s Ali Price also spent time on their bench after his error led to Ireland’s winning points on March 14. This selection inconsistency – allied to the decision of England first-choice Youngs not to opt-in for the Lions – has led to the Gallagher Premiership form of Care and Spencer coming in for assessment by Gatland and co. 

It’s the same with Smith and Simmonds, two more players who have been enjoying a rich vein of recent form with their Premiership clubs away for the Test scene, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed with the countdown on towards Thursday’s Lions tour squad announcement.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 22 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search