Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The act abolished in the seventies that could prevent another semi-final snore-fest

Fans were 'treated' to countless high-balls in the RWC semi-final between Wales and South Africa. (Original photo by Getty Images)

‘One for the purists’, a ‘test of attrition’, a ‘classic slog’.

There are many charitable ways to describe Sunday’s semi-final match between Wales and South Africa. Unless you’re looking at just the final 10 minutes, however, you certainly wouldn’t have labelled the game exciting.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were 73 kicks in the World Cup fixture, split almost evenly down the middle.

According to World Rugby’s 2018 Year in Review, the ball was in play for just under 38 minutes per tier one match last year, on average.

Assuming that number holds true for Sunday’s game, we were treated to a kick approximately every 31 seconds of the ball being in play – thrilling stuff.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The issue isn’t necessarily the sheer number of kicks but the nature of them.

Defences have become harder and harder to penetrate in the international game. Wales and South Africa seemingly tried to get around this by simply hoisting high ball after high ball.

There are two major concerns with this approach.

The first, as noted, is that it doesn’t make for a very entertaining match. South African fans will dispute this, but you’ll find very few neutrals around the world that would have enjoyed Sunday’s game.

Frankly, the only thing that made the match semi-interesting was that fact that it was a World Cup knockout game.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.instagram.com/p/B4Kqk53gOkp/

Had the match been a regular-season international fixture between tier two or three teams then viewers would have turned off their tellies well before halftime.

The game can’t survive on the importance of fixtures alone, however, if the product itself is poor.

The second major issue with the up-and-under approach is that it creates a genuine concern for player safety – which has a flow-on effect on the integrity of a match.

Fans and pundits alike have been worried that the finals of the World Cup could be decided based on red cards – and there’s no better way to get yourself sent off than to make a dangerous challenge in the air.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whilst there’s a fairly robust framework around dangerous tackles on the ground, the system is much less precise for in-air challenges.

Let’s just be thankful that no such framework was required on Sunday.

What, then, is the best solution to preventing kick-fests like what we saw in the second semi-final of 2019’s Rugby World Cup?

Perhaps rugby needs to turn to a long abolished law to disincentivise using the ‘Garyowen’ as a core-attacking play.

Prior to 1977, it was possible to claim a mark from a kick anywhere on the field – not just in one’s own 22.

Marks were a bit more complex back then.

The kicking team could advance up to where the mark was claimed, which forced the marker to drop back a few metres before taking an action.

It was also possible to kick a goal from a mark. This naturally minimised the number of kicks to hand that teams made from within their own half.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B4K9xvBg2tp/

A modern approach to the rule could see the goal attempts eliminated, but quicks-taps awarded to a defending player who makes a mark anywhere in open play. Like any tap penalty, the defending side would need to retreat 10-metres away from the player who made the mark.

The marking player would then have a free run of at least a few metres before being tackled.

It’s an approach that would encourage greater ingenuity from quick-taps whilst also discouraging the uncreative bomb.

A more radical approach would also involve banning jumping in open-play. The benefit of allowing jumping is that it rewards athleticism, but the costs are far greater.

In all likelihood, we’ll see no response to the snore-fest that Wales and South Africa conjured up on Sunday evening. It was a one-off game, the likes of which we’ll hopefully never have to bear witness to again.

Let’s just hope that Saturday’s final doesn’t head in the same direction.

Eddie Jones wasn’t too happy with Warren Gatland suggesting that England might not be up for the final:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
TM 16 minutes ago
Eben Etzebeth leads Sharks side featuring 12 Boks in starting XV

Viliame Mata now plays for Bristol, and has all season. A silly mistake, an unforced error by Ian.

1 Go to comments
G
Gary Mazzone 4 hours ago
Vern Cotter reflects on his side's recent turnaround in form

Recovering stolen Bitcoin can feel like an insurmountable challenge, especially after falling victim to scams that promise high returns with little investment. My journey began with excitement when I first learned about Bitcoin mining pools. The idea of earning substantial profits from a modest investment was enticing. I was encouraged to invest $5,200, and soon found myself caught in a web of endless demands for more money to access my funds. As time went on, I paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars, believing that each payment would finally unlock my investments. However, the requests never ceased, and I soon realized I was trapped in a scam. The weight of losing $826,000 worth of Bitcoin was unbearable, and I felt utterly helpless. I reached out to authorities, but their responses were disheartening, leaving me feeling even more isolated in my struggle. In my desperation, I even went to pray, seeking guidance and hope in what felt like a hopeless situation. I poured my heart out, asking for a sign or a way to recover my lost funds. It was during this time of reflection that I began searching for solutions online, hoping to find a way to recover my investments. That’s when I stumbled upon FUNDS RETRIEVER ENGINEER . At first, I was cynical after all, I had already been deceived so many times. However, I decided to reach out and share my story. The team at FUNDS RETRIEVER ENGINEER was understanding and compassionate, assuring me they had the expertise to help me recover my stolen Bitcoin. Within hours of providing them with the necessary information, I began to see progress. They guided me through the recovery process, keeping me informed every step of the way. It was surreal to watch as they worked diligently to trace my funds and navigate the complexities of the blockchain. To my astonishment, I received confirmation that my Bitcoin had been successfully recovered. The relief and joy I felt were indescribable. I had almost given up hope, but FUNDS RETRIEVER ENGINEER proved to be the lifeline I desperately needed. If you find yourself in a similar situation, I urge you to seek help from Reputable team at FUNDS RETRIEVER ENGINEER

For help

W H A T S A P P: +1 8 0 2 9 5 2 3 4 7 0

E m a I L F U N D S R E T R I E V E R [@] E N G I N E E R. C O M

4 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster boss outlines reasons for signing 'world-class' Rieko Ioane Leinster boss outlines reasons for signing 'world-class' Rieko Ioane
Search