Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The aggressive Hurricanes defence needs a stronger foundation

(Photos by John Cowpland / www.photosport.nz and Joe Allison/Getty Images)

The Hurricanes came up with mixed results on defence against the Chiefs as they came out looking to take the intensity up a notch with fierce line speed. Although their aggressive intent was admirable, issues around the tight five of the interior defence became apparent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Their aggressive defensive scheme looked good in patches, but, at other times, it fell apart all too easily as Hurricanes players made bad reads, lacked urgency or just failed to dominate the collision.

This style of defence, an aggressive line speed that takes away time for the ball carrier, has to be disciplined. When one player doesn’t do his job, holes open up.

Video Spacer

Where NZ Rugby is at with Silver Lake

Video Spacer

Where NZ Rugby is at with Silver Lake

That happens all too frequently with the Hurricanes, who try to engage in two-man tackles against the primary ball carrier.

In the defensive set moments before Perenara’s opening intercept try, prop Pouri Rakete-Stones and flanker Reed Prinsep pressed well off the line to take down Chiefs lock Laghlan McWhannell in a two-man tackle, illustrating what the Hurricanes like to do to opposition pods off 9.

This was good execution from the Hurricanes’ pack to force the Chiefs into a gain line loss.

Rakete-Stones and lock James Blackwell executed the two-man hit again in another good example below.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, when the attacking side adds some variation, such as utilising a tip pass inside or out, this two-man tackle can become unreliable, allowing the attacking side to punch through and make good gain line either side of the two tacklers.

The Chiefs were able to exploit this on multiple occasions, such as below when lock Scott Scrafton and prop Tyrel Lomax tried to pressure the middle forward, with both players going for Chiefs captain Sam Cane.

In doing so, they left space available in the inside lane for Chiefs flanker Kaylum Boshier to punch through on the inside pass.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rakete-Stones, acting as the inside cover defender, wasn’t up to it and was brushed off as the Chiefs got to the second line of defence and fractured the defensive line to create good momentum and front-foot ball.

Following on from that, the Chiefs used the tip pass to the outside, exposing Lomax coming outside-in for the two-man hit.

The pressure was on the next man, Scrafton, to cover the tip runner, and he did so with a low chop tackle, but the Hurricanes were lucky to escape from here as the offload was available with a huge running lane open.

The Chiefs turned the ball over, but, again, the attempted two-man tackle gave the Chiefs a decent chance to turn the tables on the interior rush defence.

When going after the two-man dominant hit, the onus has to be on the players inside and out to cover the tip passes more effectively. That means being switched on and pushing up in anticipation, which was lacking at times with this tight five.

There were also other miscommunications around the ruck when facing different formations.

After Josh Ioane had already cut open the Hurricanes in a wider channel earlier in the same sequence of play, the Chiefs first-five was at first receiver with the three-man pod to the outside, as can be seen in the example below.

Lomax drifted towards the forwards, leaving Ioane for the inside cover defender, Blackwell, who wasn’t able to stop the opposition playmaker despite slowing him down.

The lack of focus and communication around these channels from the Hurricanes’ tight five let the defence down at times.

When they do their job, they can produce dominant defence. Below, Scrafton provided pressure with quick line speed, but the rest of the defence stayed connected and pushed up and out, including the inside cover defenders, Lomax and Blackwell.

Ioane had nowhere to go and Lomax ate him up, forcing a hefty loss of metres. However, the Hurricanes do not produce this level of execution enough on a consistent basis. This is the level they must aim to achieve more frequently.

Their defence fell apart from the beginning of the second half, letting the Chiefs get back on top almost immediately after half-time.

In the first phase after a kick return from the Chiefs, sweeper TJ Perenara can be seen in the example below plugging a missing gap in the front line on the left side.

Perenara had to defend as he was in the defensive line, but instead he bailed as the ball was delivered and then shied away from contact, allowing Chiefs midfielder Quinn Tupaea to cut across the grain into the Hurricanes’ tight five.

Lomax slipped off his tackle, Blackwell went low with another weak attempt and the ball was able to be kept alive.

It was incredibly soft defence just four minutes into the second half that enabled the Chiefs to spark a 30-metre passage up the middle of the park from a situation that they should have been forced to kick their way out of.

Further down the park in the same sequence of play, Perenara came into the defensive line again but was hesitant to produce the line speed that paved the way for his intercept try earlier in the match. He was brushed aside by Emoni Narawa.

The next 20 minutes for the Hurricanes were awful as their discipline fell away, conceding six straight penalties. What was a 15-13 half-time lead quickly became a 30-15 deficit under the weight of pressure.

There were times where they won the gain line back, only to tire out and eventually break or give away a penalty. It was a Jekyll & Hyde act where they would go from a position of dominance, blunting the Chiefs’ phase backward, to conceding a try the phase after.

One area of improvement needed for the Hurricanes’ highly-aggressive defence is to run better angles while defending screen plays. As seen below, they are too slow to get past block runners during screen passes.

To build a defence that forces a big loss of metres, they have to be quicker at abandoning the short runner to pursue the guy out the back once the ball is gone.

In the example below, Ioane made light work of Hurricanes hooker Asafo Aumua, who was covering the short option for too long after the pass had been made.

Similarly, captain Ardie Savea and midfielder Billy Proctor were guilty of defensive misreads during screens plays out on the edge in the lead-up to tries scored by Chiefs duo Boshier and Chase Tiatia.

In either case, the ball was telegraphed to hit the back door option long before either Hurricane made contact with the first runner. Both were disconnected from the next defender, Julian Savea.

There were other positive aspects from the Hurricanes aggressive defensive which pointed to signs that this could be an effective point of difference for them.

The edge defence was asked to play high and force the ball over the top, which they did numerous times. At other times, the wings and centres timed their hits well and closed the Chiefs play before it made it wider.

But in order to cement themselves as a top Super Rugby team, the Hurricanes have to get stronger in the interior channels to start with. Getting sliced up the middle is a non-negotiable that cannot happen. If they are soft up the middle, there is no need to go wide.

When teams do go wide, they cannot waltz through by running a simple screen that draws poor reads so easily. All of these defensive improvements come down to better discipline and application within the defensive plan for the Hurricanes who are now 2-3 on the season.

The season is not lost yet, there is just a lot of work to do to build the foundation on defence to be a real contender.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
A
Andrew 961 days ago

Aggressive wouldnt leak so many tries....

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Cheslin Kolbe backed to end 16-year wait Cheslin Kolbe backed to end 16-year wait
Search