Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The All Blacks coaching drama has breathed life into The Rugby Championship

John Plumtree (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

The empire may be crumbling, but at least Sam Cane and Ian Foster are still standing.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s been a comical couple of weeks for the All Blacks, New Zealand Rugby (NZR) and the media.

I’m going to absent Cane from the discussion, at this point.

He isn’t, unlike Foster, turning up at press conferences proclaiming himself to be the man in charge and to possess all the answers.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

He isn’t throwing underlings under the bus and avoiding any responsibility himself.

No, Cane is just a lightning rod for the public’s dissatisfaction with Foster and NZR, having been promoted to and retained in a position for which he’s not suited.

I actually feel sorry for Cane, who appears a pawn in the game being played by his coach and employers.

I also feel sorry for Chiefs fans, who’ve seen this movie before. All of them know that as soon as Foster goes, the team will start winning. It’s just that the wait in the meantime feels so interminable.

I feel a little sorry for John Plumtree and Brad Mooar too, who’ve paid for the inadequacies of Foster and the reluctance of any other coach to come to NZR’s rescue.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s not to say Plumtree and Mooar have done a good job. Although who among us is in team meetings and at training?

Truth is, these men were expendable and Foster, it appears, was not.

We’re told, by Foster, that his heart-to-heart discussions with the playing group revealed that Plumtree and Mooar had lost the team’s confidence and support. Fair enough.

But which player in their right mind is going to say, ‘actually, let me stop you there, Ian. It’s not them, it’s you’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

It was funny to see the way some media got a bit giddy on the idea that the winds of change were about to sweep through the All Blacks. That maybe Foster and Cane might both go and that it was time to air various grievances with the team and NZR.

We had bold predictions and talk of sources suggesting various heads would roll.

Didn’t turn out that way, did it?

And that’s all about the breathtaking arrogance of NZR and the contempt with which they view opinions from outside the inner sanctum.

Covering the team, provided scheduled press conferences and Zoom calls go ahead, is going to be rather awkward from here on.

Hey, and don’t dare be critical of anyone either, because you’ll get lectured on LinkedIn by NZR staff.

If you ever wondered if the media matter or if public opinion can affect change, then you got your answer last Friday. The good folk at NZR don’t care a fig for what anyone else thinks.

The upshot will be interesting. I’ll admit I’ve already whacked a few bucks on the All Blacks beating South Africa by 13+ in a couple of weeks’ time.

I mean, if Foster is any kind of coach and the All Blacks themselves have any kind of pride, then they’ll belt the Springboks at Mbombela Stadium.

But what am I hoping for? Performances and results that continue to reflect poorly on Foster and heap pressure upon NZR to admit their appointment process was all wrong.

I want to see them squirm and I know I’m not alone in that.

Our worst fears are being realised here. People, going way back to when Foster succeeding Steve Hansen was first sign-posted, predicted things would go this way.

That he was not equipped to perform the role and that the team would go backwards.

Even a halfwit like me was able to see that.

As for NZR, this is yet another instance in which they’ve reinforced their reputation for being insular and out of touch.

Well, they’ve made their bed now. They’ve staked everything on Foster and they’ve absolved him of any blame.

And, if nothing else, they’ve breathed life into the ailing Rugby Championship.

I know I’ll be watching the Springboks tests live, rather than waiting till a more convenient hour to catch a replay.

Not least to see what happens should the All Blacks lose again.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
M
MattJH 879 days ago

I didn’t agree with fosters appointment in the first place either and think they should have got Robertson in as soon as possible. But dammit I want foster to prove me wrong more than anything. I want him to succeed.
Sort it out Fozzie.

K
Kabous 879 days ago

'belt the Springboks' by 13+ in SA? The loss to Ireland sure did a job on you.

C
CRZ38L 879 days ago

Foster it seems, is in the same position Eddie Jones was in as Wallabies coach in 2005, but with a significantly higher winning percentage than Jones.

Jones was sacked, Foster stays at the helm.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search