Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The All Blacks playing for their careers in this year's Super Rugby Pacific

(Photo By David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Are a few All Blacks playing for their careers in 2022? The honest answer is plenty should be, but few actually are.

ADVERTISEMENT

By my count, there are about 45 current All Blacks. That’s to say guys who suited up in 2021 or would’ve done had they been fit.

I lump them into three groups: the definites, the guys who’ll get picked again but arguably shouldn’t and the final group of blokes who are neither here nor there.

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath trailer | Italy Rugby documentary

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath trailer | Italy Rugby documentary

The complicating factor is the team itself. We’ve seen no evidence of a definite gameplan and no real semblance of a starting XV.

If the men coaching and selecting the side have an actual plan, then they’re doing a good job of keeping people guessing.

That’s not entirely uncommon at this stage of the Rugby World Cup cycle, but it would be a brave management group who waited until the knockout rounds of that tournament to finally show their hand.

Let’s start with the definites, of which I don’t have many. Bear in mind, these are my definites and won’t tally with yours, your mates or the blokes who actually pick the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jordie Barrett, Will Jordan, Rieko Ioane, Anton Lienert-Brown, Beauden Barrett, Aaron Smith, Ardie Savea, Scott Barrett, Tupou Vaa’i and Dane Coles are my dudes that have to be there in 2023.

I don’t like Ioane as a centre and still have doubts about which spot in the loose trio Savea should take, but they’re a must in New Zealand’s best side.

There’s no props there, just one midfield back and no-one to play No.6. Or a No.7, depending on where Savea ends up.

Fingers crossed that one or two emerge between now and then.

The next bit’s hard, because some of these have been outstanding All Blacks, but there are a group of players who really need to show us something this year. That starts with Super Rugby Pacific, which not every elite player will be too enthused about.

ADVERTISEMENT

I want Sam Whitelock and Brodie Retallick to still be All Blacks come 2023, but they’ll need to justify it. It would be nice if Joe Moody, Codie Taylor, Richie Mo’unga, Ofa Tuungafasi and Sam Cane could join them but, in all fairness, they’ll need to be quite a lot better.

Beyond them, TJ Perenara, David Havili and George Bridge could have few complaints if a quiet franchise season sees them fall from All Blacks contention.

But add those 10 names to the guys on the definites list and that’s still only 20 players.

It’s no so long ago that we sympathised with selectors because of all the good players they had to leave out. Sadly, we’re now in an era where merely adequate footballers have become regulars in the squad.

Would some guys perform better under a different coaching group? I suspect so, but it’s a moot point.

We’ve got what we’ve got and there is a large group of players who need to find a way to play to their potential in an All Blacks jumper. We all believe the talent exists, but the performances in 2020 and 2021 haven’t backed that belief up often enough.

Frankly, it feels like the All Blacks are a team in transition, in which some all-time greats are showing their age and the next generation aren’t quite good enough.

If I have a wish for Super Rugby Pacific, it’s that guys grind it out game after game. I don’t want to see a good 40 minutes here or a barnstorming fortnight there. I want to see guys demand selection through consistency of performance.

If Whitelock and Retallick want to be among the first names on the teamsheet, then they have to earn it. If Cane is to finally establish himself as captain, then he’ll have to prove his durability. If Taylor wants to hold off the challenge of Samisoni Taukei’aho, then that starts with the Crusaders. If Moody still bristles at the suggestion the All Blacks pack got done by Ireland in Dublin, then he needs to show it rather than say it.

The challenge for all the would-be’s and might-be’s is to match the effort and excellence of Ardie Savea, to find the accuracy that someone like Jordie Barrett has.

Lots of positions remain wide open here and it’s time for a lot of players to actually justify their All Blacks status.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
D
David 1041 days ago

I think you make some good points here but one thing you forget is that AB coaches fail to turn Super Rugby form into AB form Codie Taylor, Richie Mo’unga, case in point, one the lead try scorer and the other the consistently player of the year. Havilli and Blackadder had breakout seasons with the Crusaders but AB required them in different roles within the AB set up. Auckland will be the team to watch this season and consistent game and position selection will be the key for them as it should be for the AB's.

s
stephen 1054 days ago

Think you are right with the shoe ins....but mayby after that just go back to simple policy of in form you are in ABs prob is lots of players like Mounga etc are good at Super xv but miles away in heat of battles test rugby

M
Meehawl 1055 days ago

The situation in NZ won't improve while, ironically considering the back to front view NH rugby observers have of NZ rugby, the island nations use the infrastructure a small nation like NZ built up with minimal resources, to build their (Polynesia's) own teams and sons, at the expense of NZ teams and sons. The reality of NZ rugby's parasitised union will start to reveal itself soon, as my little nation suffers as the host nest to the "shining cuckoo" of the rugby world, Polynesia. Not PC but, 100% accurate despite what an army of virtue signallers would have the world believe.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search