The All Blacks still don't understand World Cups despite what Carter taught them
The Springboks had rode their luck through two one-point knockout wins into the final against the All Blacks and managed one more.
The rugby Gods smiled down from above as they escaped with a 12-11 win over a 14-man All Blacks side.
Described as a team of destiny where winning the Rugby World Cup was inevitable, who can then deny the presence of divine intervention.
Because much of what happened on a soggy night in Paris was out of the Springboks hands.
The uncontrollables fell fortuitously in South Africaâs favour time and time again.
A new interpretation on foul play was found to send blindside flanker Shannon Frizell to the sin bin for accidentally falling on a playerâs leg following a failed cleanout in the second minute.
Wayne Barnes later apologised to Ardie Savea for getting his call wrong on a breakdown contest where Savea had by all intensive purposes won a holding on penalty.
When Barnes repeatedly called âno knock-on, no knock-onâ and allowed play to continue for multiple phases leading to a would-be try to Aaron Smith, but there was no issue coming back and overriding Barnesâ original call.
As there was a try involved, this is standard process allowed by the laws to review any errors made in the lead-up.
It was these beautiful moments of fortune and chance that compounded in South Africaâs favour to keep them on top.
Sam Caneâs red card was deemed to be sufficiently different to Siya Kolisiâs yellow card offence which occurred later on.
To be clear, all these calls are justifiable despite having room to be interpreted differently. And despite all of this the All Blacks had a ridiculous number of chances to still win.
Caneâs moment of reckless aggression came at the worst time for the All Blacks, having just forced a turnover and won a scrum in front of the sticks after a period of sustained pressure.
They had worked hard for that moment for a chance to close the gap down 9-3. Instead, they were left to play with 14 men from the 26th minute having already played with 10 minutes without Frizell.
The All Blacks management and coaches have constantly defended Caneâs character. We keep hearing time-after-time that his mishaps are âout of characterâ.
When he foot tripped a fan running on the field in Mendoza, itâs out of character. When he doesnât show up to a press conference after the Super Rugby final loss, itâs out of character. When he questions the fans knowledge of the game in a pre-recorded interview, itâs out of character. When heâs getting into verbals on the field with Michael Hooper or Peter OâMahoney, itâs out of character.
Itâs not who he is they say. Well, after all these instances it seems like this is exactly who he is and maybe itâs time to embrace that instead of pretending otherwise.
He doesnât have the temperament like Richie McCaw to take physical punishment and stay silent & focus on the job at hand. He wants to fight back and give it out as much as he takes it, and there is nothing wrong with that.
He is far more combative in nature, his competitive edge has a Millennial twist to it. He might enjoy the verbals and the satisfaction that comes from rubbing it in an opponentâs face. It seems like he holds grudges, he takes things personally and this can be fuelled into great performances like that against Ireland in the quarter-final.
We canât hide from the darker side to Sam Cane anymore. Heâs never been the squeaky clean character or been able to pull off the âoh shucksâ humble persona of McCaw. Let Cane be Cane and find out how to harness the shadow into greatness.
This red card in the World Cup final will haunt Cane for a long time, forever perhaps. No one will be more disappointed than the man himself. But the pain of it will be channeled into Caneâs redemption story no doubt.
The Springboks with a one man advantage even did what they could to even up the game. Kolisi was sent to the bin for another 10 minutes, Kolbe as well in the final 10 for a deliberate knock-down.
The second half was all New Zealand which is why in the end they have no excuses to rely on. Once the dam broke and the All Blacks found a try through Beauden Barrett, the game was there for the taking for the All Blacks.
The Springboks had absolutely nothing other than a late Handre Pollard drop goal attempt which was partially charged by Ardie Savea.
For all the experience that the All Blacks possess they have, they still donât understand one incredibly critical aspect of knockout rugby that the Springboks do.
Which is that the lead is more important than the knockout blow and you donât wait to the last moment to take it.
This is on Richie Moâunga, this on Beauden Barrett and this is on Jordie Barrett.
They do not have the instinct or feel for the moment required to make the clutch play when it is on offer. There were two golden opportunities that they blew.
The first was right after the Barrett try still down 12-11. The All Blacks worked down into South Africaâs half once again straight away. The clock chewed into the 64th minute and into the final quarter. These are the championship minutes.
They played 12 phases off Smith, cumbersome forward carries off No 9 that did not build any front foot momentum but didnât lose ground either. There was no line speed from South Africa. They were on the edge of South Africaâs 22.
Instead of dropping into the pocket and taking a shot from under 40 meters out, Moâunga threw a wild cutout pass that was potentially forward to Will Jordan.
Jordan was stripped in the tackle by Kwagga Smith for a turnover and the opportunity was lost.
They had 12 phases to sort that out.
A missed drop goal at that stage is inconsequential with still 15 minutes remaining. But a successful one takes back the lead.
The next chance came with a free roll of the dice after Kolbeâs knock-down in the 72nd minute.
The All Blacks regained possession under penalty advantage and Mark Telea pierced the South African defence right up the middle to the edge of the 22.
They have all the momentum in the world. Itâs a free shot under penalty advantage. South Africa are all offside due to Teleaâs run and wouldnât be able to bring much pressure to charge the ball down.
Instead the All Blacks fall into a flat shape and try to run a pattern in search of more. They lost possession and the penalty was awarded back near halfway.
It was a two-for-one chance at getting the lead back except the All Blacks didnât want two shots at goal.
They left it up to a 50-metre penalty shot on the angle by Jordie Barrett and he missed.
The game drivers who are supposed to make the key decisions couldnât think of dropping in the pocket and taking a shot at three, and one of the opportunities was a free roll.
Under head coach Ian Foster the All Blacks have not attempted a drop goal. Not once.
In his first match in charge against Australia they drew 16-all in Wellington because no one had the brains to take a chip shot drop goal from dead in front with time up on the clock.
They have retained no knowledge about World Cups from Dan Carter, who in 2015 took drop goals in the semi-final and final.
Carter didnât wait until the final moments. He read the momentum, he understood the defensive resolve of the opposition, and the match situation.
Against the Springboks in the 2015 semi-final, New Zealand were down 12-7 with a yellow card early in the second half.
He snapped a drop goal on first phase off a lineout to make it a two point game with plenty of time to play. Down a man they were able to eat into the lead.
Six minutes later back to a full compliment of 15 men Beauden Barrett crossed in the corner to take the lead which they didnât relinquish.
In the final the All Blacks raced out to 21-3 before a furious comeback by the Wallabies closed the gap to four points at 21-17.
The All Blacks had no momentum and hadnât had any scoring chances for a while. With 10 minutes to play under no advantage, Carter snapped a 40 metre drop goal from way out to restore a seven point cushion.
From there they closed out the game and a final try to Beauden Barrett against the run of play sealed the deal.
Moâunga or either of the Barretts may well have missed those chances at drop goals to go up 14-12. But youâve got to live with that.
To quote Michael Jordan, you miss 100 per cent of the shots you donât take. So take the damn shot.
This is a World Cup final and you are down by a point and down a man. You donât need a try you need two points to go in front and three will do it.
The All Blacks showed zero respect to the match situation and paid the price for that.
At least Pollard knew what to do, to try and push the lead out to four point lead rather than one.
The All Blacks end up losing a World Cup final by one point despite having every opportunity to win it.
And they have no one else to blame but themselves.
Reach out to bsbforensic. com if you have been cheated by online fraud they helpe me out
Your opinion thatâs ok, but in my opinion the rule's were not followed and the officials failed in their responsibilities to administer the ruled. Thatâs my opinion..
I have been a bit busy. Lots of bad guys to catch in dark Africa. My children do their own thing as all children do so they donât really care about a comment section on a rugby site. In any case easy money is what I made betting on a Springbok win in the finalđ This son of apartheid will use said money to spoil his two none white children this xmas.
IYO. Bye II.
Didnât YOU state; âIâm gona have to cut you off budyâ? So whoâs doing the runner, moron?
And the expression is âas dumb as a rockâ, not brick, fool.
You canât spell or articulate & can only resort to perversion. Weird, or what?
Is this the best you can do?
Are you still living at home? Might explain a few things, tiny tot. A mummyâs (note spelling) boy? Not a daddyâs boy? Surely you canât have one!?
Hi DonaldâŚâŚhad enoughâŚ..lolâŚâŚrunning away with your tail between your legsâŚ..how pathetic âŚ..like your rugby teamâŚâŚlosersâŚâŚboth of youâŚ..anywayâŚ..I let you get back to playing with yourselfâŚâŚif you can find moms photoâŚâŚyou are as dumb as a brickâŚ..idiotâŚ. .!
âŚ
I did see your reply about All Blacks 10 and No I donât hate the Kiwiâs. I rather like Nz rugby and Aus rugby too when they get it together. ben smith on the other handâŚâŚ
Oops! Temper, temper. I will sod off, but unlikely to do so to read âThe Art of The Dealâ, as the other Donaldâs deals seem to have been illegally inflated!? Better role model required? Better to re-read Ben Smith as did I? Opinion? What are YOU stating, then? Hate? What with yr anti Kiwi rhetoric, gloating? Please. Look up hypocrisy, d/standards. Educate. Cheerio, carrot boy.
PS You might, might not wish to scroll up to my response regarding yr query on NZâs future 10 etc. Funnily enuff, it contained some RUGBY content. You may even find an olive branch. Who knows? TTFN?
Desperate by my stating âBye, byeâ? Is yr favourite film â1 Flew Over the Cuckooâs Nest? World against me, not you with YR weirdo take on pubic bathrooms? A psychological critique on yrself? Find someone? You need to find a psychiatrist brother, pronto, if any will have you. Where the eff is the rugby content in yr warped rant? And why the dots in yr gibberish? Havenât you heard of commas? Get a life, get out more & above all, stay away from public dunnies (toilets to you, Odd Job!).
The art of the deal is a book. Written by Trump whom I was quoting.. Now please go sulk in a corner like the All Blacks. I donât care what you own or what you think you know. Check this please â Ben is a Kiwi columnist at RugbyPass specialising in analysis, breaking down rugby as he sees it to provide insight into what professional teams are trying to do around the worldâ. That is his bio on Rugby Pass. As he sees it. His opinion!! All subjective bs with a healthy hate of the Springboks. Please donât reply just sod off.
I own my house, so not poor. I have an equivalent âOâ, Aâ level ed, so not a rock & roll scientist, but hardly stupid either.
Ill informed, unscientific opinion is stupid though, Nijin. Just re-read yr preceding stuff.
And BTW, WTF is âthe art of the dealâ?
What deal, FFS?! You hoist yrsrlf by yr own prattish petard, fellow.
You alphabet personâŚ..you are Obviously desperate for my approvalâŚnobody understands you rightâŚ..the world is against youâŚ..shameâŚas I saidâŚ.Iâm sure you will find someoneâŚ.maybe in a public bathroomâŚ.late at nightâŚ.good luck with thatâŚ.
Largely schadenfreude. How many times repeated Boksâ 4th WC? Why? Itâs in my 1st sentence. When people keep repeating something, itâs to psychologically reassure themselves due to underlying insecurity. Check it out. If secure, no need for rhetoric. Others can work this out, so itâs superfluous.
As for NZâs 1st 5? Dunno. Robertson has his own ideas. Unknown to me.
Perofeta? BB? Off temporarily. Josh Ioane? DMac seems next cab, but Razor hasnât sought or has made do with standards at Canterbury. Canes, Blues, like Morgan, Plummer? However, none yet seem head & shoulders. Iâd go DM.
Captain? Suspect Cane may be out of favour. Possibly Savea. Unless a bolter, like Papa? Or Scott barrett? If he can keep hands off ball when grounded. Depends on ânewâ team, coaching composition. Iâd stick with underrated Cane. Ton of grit, back from 2 yrs injury, broke neck. Big hitter, defence. Unduly vilified (like Foster) IMO.
Following departures, 1st pick team. Need for locks. B/row rebalance? Then opt for skipper. A forward? Wild card back? J Barrett? Probably former. Also assuming itâs long term?
IOW, beats me. These are my thoughts.
Now off for zzzz! See ya.
Donât blame you for doing a runner, Saffa. Out of yr depth? And you ainât my friend. Do you have any? Do you even know the shape of a rugby ball? Well, itâs the shape of yr head. Bye, bye then & donât forget yr pointy, dunceâs hat on yr way out.
Iâm gona have to cut you off budyâŚthis relationship is going anywhere âŚdonât cry to muchâŚ..you will find someone elseâŚits not youâŚ.it's me. Goodbye my friend
Arenât Saffas here missing the point of this article? Smithy must be larfing all the way to his editor with all the clicks heâs received. Heâs probably got a pay rise & he hasnât needed to respond, even once. He who larfs last, eh? Take about sheep!? Ha, ha.
Nelson Mandela?? You must be Trump right? Some more of my rhetoric? Donât answer as they are rhetorical questions. You must be poor or stupid as you clearly do not understand the art of the deal!!
Googled (capital âGâ) Google. Stated it should have been âwhoâ, not âwhomâ. Didnât recognise âwhomeâ.
Also that you didnât quote Einstein as you were too, youâll like this, subjective as you generalise, taking no factors affecting outcomes into consideration.
But Ben Smith did. Oh, dear.
Furthermore, a frustrated Google asked if you quoted some bloke called Nelson Mandela?! Then G asked if you comprehended the words ârantâ, âdrivelâ, âcontradictionâ.
I felt unable to respond on yr be1/2. Sorry.
Everything I have to say is unfortunately subjective as it is my oppinion yes? There I go again with the rhetorical question. But yes objectivaly(not my oppinion but fact) the Springboks just won their 4th world cupđ by playing 4 of the top five teams the last being the All Blacks. As for ârugby boneâ who will be the All Black 10 for next year? Is there anyone that has promise And who will be captain?
Well, made an exception. Couldnât resist. Still waiting for an âobjectiveâ rugby bone.. which might be a lifetime of course.
Glad one could be of service. And here I thought you were boredđ
Jeez, Ninj, I read Shogun a 100 yrs ago. So what?
However, youâd better not stop listening to rock music anytime soon!
Donât you usually throw a dog a bone?Need you be so self deprecating?
Block a blockhead? Spoil my fun? You kidding me?
âYou can create excitement, you can do wonderful promotion and get all kinds of press, and you can throw in a little hyperbole. But if you donât deliver the goods, people will eventually catch on.â That describes the all blacks run to the final. The All Blacks lost so anything he writes about why they lost and what they should have done or not done is subjective. Everything he wrote. By the way I donât expect you even know whome I quoted and from where but like you said google is your friend.
Chris was already used as a username. Ninjin is a caracter out of a James Clavelle novel Shogun, a minor oneâ and I will listen to rock music untill I die. Nothing to do with attention sorry and sure throw me a ârugby related boneâ and I will answer in kind. Or els donât reply to my post or block me. You do have options.