Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The ambitious England message Henry Slade has for the Springboks

By PA
Henry Slade looks on during last Saturday's England loss to Australia (Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Henry Slade has insisted that England will resist the temptation to strip back their game plan in a quest to rescue their autumn by toppling South Africa at Allianz Stadium on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s attack has evolved significantly since a watershed defeat by Scotland in February but they now find themselves in the midst of a four-Test losing run that is expected to be extended by the back-to-back world champions.

It took a long-range penalty from Handre Pollard to sink Steve Borthwick’s men at the death when the rivals last met in a ferocious 2023 Rugby World Cup semi-final that has turned this weekend’s meeting into a grudge match.

Video Spacer

Springbok head coach Rassie Erasmus on his team’s perfromance against Scotland

Springbok head coach Rassie Erasmus admitted that his team produced a shaky performance in their 32-15 victory over Scottland on Saturday.

Video Spacer

Springbok head coach Rassie Erasmus on his team’s perfromance against Scotland

Springbok head coach Rassie Erasmus admitted that his team produced a shaky performance in their 32-15 victory over Scottland on Saturday.

England excelled at the Stade de France with a low-risk kicking strategy that was brilliantly executed but, in the words of wing Tommy Freeman, their ambition now is to “play big with our chests out”.

Slade added that they must continue to broaden their horizons – even against the Springboks. “We are not going to shut up shop and go away from what we are trying to do,” the veteran Exeter centre said.

Fixture
Internationals
England
20 - 29
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

“We have got a DNA of how we want to play, how we want to attack and how we want to defend. We have a specific way we want to play each week, catered to each team, but we have got our DNA in what we are trying to be about, which is ever-present.

“We will be pushing as hard as we can to accelerate that learning and improvement and hopefully get a good result against South Africa.”

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s ability with the ball in hand was evident in the five tries they scored in the 42-37 defeat by Australia last Saturday – a loss which has placed them in must-win territory heading into the penultimate fixture of the autumn.

Crucially, however, they also leaked five tries and their second highest number of points ever conceded at Twickenham, in the process missing a staggering 36 tackles. Joe El-Abd has taken charge of the defence following the shock resignation of Felix Jones in August and the aggressive blitz system introduced by the Irishman is now under the microscope.

“I feel like it is such a way of defending that if there is not a full buy-in, then cracks appear,” said Slade, an influential player for England due to his familiarity with the blitz as used by Exeter.

“The longer we have training, the more understanding everyone has as a group and getting on the same page, the more it can be a really powerful way of defending. We are trying to fast track that learning. I feel this week there has been a big step forward in that regard.

ADVERTISEMENT

“More emphasis has been put on it. We have had some games to review ourselves and had some scenarios to look at, so we can work out what we do in this scenario or that scenario.”

Narrow losses to New Zealand and Australia this autumn mean the stake are high at Twickenham this weekend. “When you look at things outcome-based, on the surface nought from two isn’t good with the double World Cup winners coming up. It is not an ideal situation to be in,” Slade said.

“But we feel like we have made some good strides as a group over these last four weeks and are looking forward to a big challenge on Saturday.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

12 Comments
L
LeeAnt68 36 days ago

England has shown they can compete with the Top teams but dropped their intensity in the last 10-15 minutes!

I do like Marcus Smith, maybe give him the full 80!

In last year's semi, England almost knocked us out of the RWC, with a clever drop-goal kicking game plan!

Most Bok fans are expecting the Boks to wipe England, I am a bit more cautious, England seems to know how to unsettle us!

C
Cantab 37 days ago

Beaten 3 times in a row by a rebuilding AB team , upset by a very average Aussie side. Doesn't get any easier against the current world number one either. England are indeed in trouble

M
Marc Jones 37 days ago

For whatever reason, England vs South Africa is always a “grudge match”.

It’s not beyond the realm of possibility that England beat the Springboks but it’s difficult to imagine at this point… the Springboks have only lost twice in 2024, both times by 1 point. England hasn’t been consistently good enough.

H
Hellhound 37 days ago

England have evolved no doubt, but expansive rugby is not the solution to beat the Boks. They are coming up against the best defensive team in the world. SA have conceded the least amount of tries this year. Even the rusty players find a way in the Bok team to grind out wins.

E
Ed the Duck 37 days ago

England vs everyone is a grudge match…!

T
Tom 38 days ago

England's attack hasn't evolved. It sucked against the ABs and against Australia, Marcus Smith was the only player who created anything.

H
Hellhound 37 days ago

Marcus Smith is one of the few outstanding players in that England team, I agree.

f
fl 37 days ago

Almost as if he isn't a very good playmaker!


If we picked Feyi-Waboso at 10 we'd get a similar result.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search