Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The average height and weight of a Northern Hemisphere inside centre

Kyle Eastmond and Stuart McCloskey (Getty Images)

Of all the positions on a rugby field, inside centre is probably the most diverse. The role and shape of players in this position can differ dramatically from team to team and even within a squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is a position which does not necessitate a particular style, and it is therefore used to suit a team’s needs. England’s recent Rugby World Cup squad was a perfect example of that, where Eddie Jones would sometimes opt for a ball-playing No.12 in Owen Farrell, or the far more powerful option in Manu Tuilagi in different matches. Both are stylistically different, but equally effective.

WATCH:

Video Spacer

This therefore lends itself to a fascinating comparison between the size of different inside centres in Europe’s top three leagues, France’s Top 14, England’s Gallagher Premiership and the Guinness Pro14.

The best time to compare all three leagues in recent weeks was the first weekend in January. That was the last time teams would have been able to field their strongest teams in the league before the European competitions, the Six Nations and the coronavirus pandemic.

As there is no concrete requirement of what an inside centre should look like, there is a wide range of heights between players as opposed to other positions on the field, such as the second row which obviously demands taller players.

The average height of inside centres in the Top 14 and the Premiership were the same, 1m84 (6’0”), while they were slightly taller in the Pro14 at 1m86 (6’1”), there was an observable sweep of heights with each league.

The tallest player in the Top 14 was Montpellier’s Francois Steyn, measuring at 1m91 (6’3”), but the Premiership had three players the same or taller, and the Pro14 had two players taller. Gloucester’s Billy Twelvetrees, Bath’s Jamie Roberts, Ulster’s Stuart McCloskey and Connacht’s Tom Daly were the tallest inside centres this weekend, each standing at 1m93 (6’4”).

ADVERTISEMENT

Toulon’s Anthony Belleau was also the shortest in France at 1m77 (5’10”), but he still stood taller than three players in England and one in the Pro14. This shows that there is more of a uniform height in the Top 14 compared to the other leagues, where there is a noticeable scattering of heights.

There is a clearer delineation between the leagues in terms of weight however, and it seems to buck the trend. Traditionally, players in the Top 14, certainly in the pack, weigh in heavier than their counterparts across Europe, but this was the league that actually had the lightest inside centres on average at 97kg (15st4lb), compared to the Pro14’s 99.5kg (15st9lb) and the Premiership’s 100kg (15st11lb).

The Top 14’s tendency to have such sizeable and brutish packs perhaps renders larger backs obsolete, but there are some behemoths in the Top 14 back lines. This probably suggests the French philosophy may lean towards larger outside centres, judging by Mathieu Bastareaud over the past decade for Les Bleus, and the incumbent No.13 for the national team, Virimi Vakatawa, who both boast solid frames. This is more akin to teams like Australia over the years, who have opted for more creative inside centres, although there are always exceptions.

Conversely, the UK and Ireland have perhaps tended to opt for larger inside centres and more fleet of foot players outside them. This is perhaps more similar to the All Blacks, who have favoured the likes of Ma’a Nonu (104kg) and Sonny Bill Williams (108kg) at No.12 over the past decade. Of course, all nations have selected players that suggest otherwise, but this is a slight trend and perhaps one reason why there is a difference across Europe’s leagues.

ADVERTISEMENT
Inside centre
Sonny Bill Williams. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The heaviest player in the Top 14 at inside centre over this particular weekend was the Springbok Steyn, who was 107kg (17st). But it would be wrong to pigeonhole him simply in the category of a ball carrier, as he was probably in the team more for his kicking than anything else.

The three players in the Premiership who weighed more than the South African were Bath’s Roberts, Bristol Bears’ Will Hurrell and Harlequins’ Paul Lasike, and the one in the Pro14, Ulster’s McCloskey. These four do serve a different purpose on the field to Steyn, and are deployed more often to carry over the gain line. Lasike weighed in the heaviest in Europe at 113kg (17st11lb), and his direct style of running is vastly different from Steyn’s.

Only 33 per cent of the inside centres in the Premiership were under 100kg (15st11lb), which does suggest the league favours a hard-running option in that shirt. In contrast, 57 per cent of the players in the Top 14 were under 100kg, and the Pro14 sat in between with 50 per cent.

The Premiership and the Pro14 only had inside centre in each league under 90kg, Leicester Tigers’ Kyle Eastmond at 83kg (13st1lb) and Cardiff Blues’ Ben Thomas at 89kg (14st). On the other hand, the Top 14 had four players under that bracket (29 per cent). Both centres playing for Zebre and Benetton Treviso from Italy were also more than France’s average.

This is yet another indication that there is a clear schism between France’s philosophy and the rest of Europe. The Top 14 prefers a smaller inside centre, more likely to play the role of a distributor.
Over the course of the Six Nations we saw Artuhur Vincent start at No.12 twice for France, which fits the smaller mould of the Top 14, and Gaël Fickou, who is indeed more sizeable, but not compared to the larger centres in Test rugby.

England opted for Farrell, which goes against the trend of the Premiership, while Hadleigh Parkes and Sam Johnson were used by Wales and Scotland, respectively, who are two players that straddle the two extreme sizes that may fill the No.12 jersey. Ireland’s Bundee Aki is certainly one, however, who fits the template of a carrying option.

This once again not only shows the diversity in the role, but the fact that there is not necessarily any consistency. While one league, or country, may typically prefer one style of player, it is by no means a prerequisite, which makes it such an intriguing position.

*The height and weight of each inside centre has been taken from their club’s website.

TOP 14

Agen – Nathan Decron- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 95kg (14st13lb)
Lyon – Charlie Ngatai- 1m86 (6’1”)/ 103kg (16st3lb)

Racing 92 – Olivier Klemenczak- 1m81 (5’11”)/ 81kg (12st11lb)
ASM Clermont Auvergne – George Moala- 1m81 (5’11”)/ 96kg (15st2lb)

Bordeaux -Begles- Remi Lamerat- 1m84 (6’0”)/ 105kg (16st8lb)
Bayonne – Romain Barthelémy- 1m87 (6’2”)/ 93kg (14st9lb)

Montpellier- Francois Steyn- 1m91 (6’3”)/ 107kg (17st)
Brive- Nico Lee- 1m80 (5’11”)/ 89kg (14st)

Pau – Jale Vatubua- 1m89 (6’2”)/ 105kg (16st8lb)
La Rochelle – Levani Botia- 1m82 (6’0”)/ 103kg (16st3lb)

Toulon- Anthony Belleau- 1m77 (5’10”)/ 85kg (13st5lb)
Castres- Robert Ebersohn- 1m80 (5’11”)/ 89kg (14st)

Stade Francais – Jonathan Danty- 1m81 (5’11”)/ 106kg (16st10lb)
Toulouse – Pita Ahki- 1m89 (6’2”)/ 96kg (15st2lb)

Average: 1m84 (6’0”)/ 97kg (15st4lb)

GALLAGHER PREMIERSHIP

Sale Sharks – Rohan Janse van Rensburg- 1m86 (6’1”)/ 109kg (17st2lb)
Harlequins – Paul Lasike- 1m75 (5’9”)/ 113kg (17st11lb)

Saracens – Brad Barritt- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 95kg (14st13lb)
Worcester Warriors – Ryan Mills- 1m88 (6’2”)/ 100kg (15st11lb)

Gloucester – Billy Twelvetrees- 1m93 (6’4”)/ 103kg (16st3lb)
Bath – Jamie Roberts- 1m93 (6’4”)/ 110kg (17st5lb)

Leicester Tigers – Kyle Eastmond- 1m70 (5’7”)/ 83kg (13st1lb)
Bristol Bears – Will Hurrell- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 108kg (17st)

Wasps – Michael Le Bourgeois- 1m91 (6’3”)/ 100kg (15st11lb)
Northampton Saints – Piers Francis- 1m83 (6’0”)/ 90kg (14st2lb)

London Irish – Thomas Stephenson- 1m78 (5’10”)/ 96kg (15st2lb)
Exeter Chiefs – Sam Hill- 1m84 (6’0”)/ 103kg (16st3lb)

Average: 184 (6’0”)/ 101kg (16st)

GUINNESS PRO14

Ulster – Stuart McCloskey- 1m93 (6’4”)/ 111kg (17st7lb)
Munster – Rory Scannell- 1m78 (5’10”)/ 96kg (15st2lb)

Cardiff Blues – Ben Thomas- 1m83 (6’0″)/ 89kg (14st)
Scarlets – Hadleigh Parkes- 1m87 (6’2”)/ 101kg (16st)

Edinburgh – Matt Scott- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 106kg (16st10lb)
Southern Kings – Howard Mnisi- 1m84 (6’0”)/ 102kg (16st1lb)

Leinster – Joe Tomane- 1m88 (6’2”)/ 102kg (16st1lb)
Connacht – Tom Daly- 1m93 (6’4”)/ 102kg (16st1lb)

Zebre – Enrico Lucchin- 1m88 (6’2”)/ 99 kg (15st8lb)
Cheetahs – Benhard Janse Van Rensburg- 1m88 (6’2”)/ 94kg (14st11lb)

Dragons – Tom Griffiths- 1m88 (6’2”)/ 98kg (15st6lb)
Ospreys – Scott Williams- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 100kg (15st11lb)

Benetton Treviso – Luca Morisi- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 98kg (15st6lb)
Glasgow Warriors – Sam Johnson- 1m85 (6’1”)/ 95kg (14st13lb)

Average: 1m86 (6’1”)/ 99.5kg (15st9lb)

The combined average height and weight of an inside centre across the three leagues was 185cm (6’0.5″) and 99.1kg (15st8Ibs).

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 35 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Top 100: Why do the best players come from the best teams? Top 100: Why do the best players come from the best teams?
Search