Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The bite don't match the bark

Dejected South Africa players Faf de Klerk and Malcolm Marx leave the pitch after the second test between South Africa and Ireland at Kings Park in Durban, South Africa. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Look, we get it. It’s a passionate nation that loves rugby. We love that. But what becomes increasingly apparent with South African rugby, at all levels, is that the bite doesn’t match the bark.

ADVERTISEMENT

South African rugby is sold by all of its patriotic supporters as the greatest thing since slice bread. The hyperbole is extreme and pride drips with every comment posted on social media.

Let’s start with schoolboy rugby and go from there. We don’t need to even get into the women’s or sevens, because South Africa hasn’t delivered anything in those.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

We hear how tough South African schoolboy rugby is and we keep getting told how nothing compares.

Yet when it comes to global schoolboy titles, New Zealand leads the way with nine Sanix titles, the Japan-based tournament that has been running since the year 2000, and two World Schools titles, the new tournament launched in 2018.

Hamilton Boys holds four world championships, the most of any individual school. Yet, if we are lead to believe, South Africa has the best schoolboy teams.

But apparently once they get to U20 level, they can’t keep up with their global rivals.

South Africa have hosted the last two World U20 Championships but were grouped in this year’s event, beaten handsomely by Argentina and then beat on the buzzer by England. They were beaten again by Argentina and will now play for seventh place. Last year they made the semi-finals but lost to Ireland 31-12.

The South African U20 side has won the tournament just once, in 2012, now 12 years ago. They’ve been perennial semi-finalists, finishing third on nine occasions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Somehow the best schoolboy talent in the world consistently falls short in the two years after they graduate high school.

Once they make it professionally, it is a similar story. At domestic level in Super Rugby the South African teams pulled in three championships in 24 years of competing.

The great Bulls side won in 2007 and then back-to-back in 2009 and 2010. But even the Australians managed more championships, with four between the Brumbies, Reds and Waratahs.

New Zealand teams dominated the competition taking every other title, the Crusaders the pick of the bunch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since leaving for greener pastures in the United Rugby Championship, the South African teams have hosted the final three times in three years, with just the Stormers winning one title.

In a bid to go back-to-back, the Stormers fell to Munster at home in 2023 and this year the Bulls lost to Glasgow Warriors in a mammoth upset.

But the fact remains, just like the U20 side, South African teams have just one title in the last 14 years of club competitions.

The Sharks took home the Challenge Cup this season but that doesn’t count, it’s Europe’s division two competition and effectively a mickey mouse plate competition.

Europe’s elite play in the Champions Cup, the likes of Toulouse, Leinster, La Rochelle. South Africa’s best have been granted entry but haven’t come within a stone’s throw of winning.

Now we get to the Springboks. The four-time Rugby World Cup winners.

We’ll start with the results outside of World Cups.

There have been some great teams, the 2009 Springbok side is the best of the modern era.

But those have been few and far between as they have captured just four SANZAAR titles in 27 years of competition in the Tri Nations since 1996 and the Rugby Championship since 2012.

They hold more wooden spoons than any of their rivals, with Argentina closing in quickly.

The Springboks have generally held dominance over the Northern Hemisphere teams but that is slipping away, as it is for New Zealand and Australia as well.

The four World Cup wins can be broken down in isolation and become far less impressive on inspection.

The 2007 side won the title without beating a top four opponent. The 2019 side beat Italy, Japan, Wales and England, basically half a Six Nations campaign.

And the 2023 side got the gift of all gifts, the ultimate charity in the form of an opposition red card in the first half. And yet they just scraped by one point.

Since claiming back-to-back World Cups, despite winning no Rugby Championships in between and running at a mid-60 per cent win rate, we’ve had to listen about how the Springboks have global supremacy.

And here they finally are, against Ireland at home, the back-to-back Six Nations winners who have put the runs on the board despite failing again at the quarter-final stage of the World Cup.

Ireland have a home winning streak of 19 in a row, numbers South Africa could only dream of. They put 17 Test wins in a row together, just one short of the record.

And they were sent to South Africa for Two Tests to find out who the real deal is.

The Springboks edged game one 27-20 on the back of two huge plays by James Lowe. He was potentially in touch when he assisted for the wrong team, handing Kolbe a try, and his blazing solo was called back on an obscure ruling.

The first Test was decided by small margins could have been 27-20 to Ireland. The second Test was again a close affair, with an incredible Ciaran Frawley drop goal snatching a 25-24 win at the death.

So they couldn’t be separated, sharing the series 1-1.

By beating South Africa on home soil and levelling the series, Ireland have now claimed three of the last four in the recent years since 2022. Going back to 2016 when they last met was in a different era. But that’s now a 75 per cent win rate for Andy Farrell over a team that supposedly has ‘global supremacy’.

If you give it out, you have to take it. Fair’s fair. Because quite simply, the bite don’t match the bark with South African rugby.

If South African rugby wants to be the King of global rugby, then production at all levels over the long-term is required.

And that means beating the Irish when they are put right in front you at home. It means winning more U20 titles. It means winning more club titles.

It’s time to dial down the barking or increase the bite. The former is the right thing to do until the latter happens.

In this episode of Walk the Talk, Jim Hamilton chats with double World Cup winner Damian de Allende about all things Springbok rugby, including RWC2023 and the upcoming Ireland series. Watch now for free on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

243 Comments
D
DO 148 days ago

Ben’s wife 100% cheated on him with a saffa. It’s the only explanation for the sheer level of hate he has for South Africa. It must have been wonderful to see his face when the boks won the world cup against NZ, again.

B
Barry 152 days ago

Arguing? I thought we are pals?


You don't eat potatoes? Missing out on a compete life.


That turlough lad is some gas. Angriest fool you’d ever meet. I reckon the priests got at him when he was an altar boy.

B
Barry 153 days ago

The only development was in March this year when WADA suspended the accreditation of the Bloemfontein Laboratory.


How fitting that you look to the analogy to guess who the aggressor is!? Who's the victim!

The sport. They aren't compliant. Still.


If you can't read, that's on you.

W
Werner 153 days ago

The compliance issue was related to the govt legislation not being updated in line with protocol. Legislation has been updated. No longer non compliant.


Come on tell me how they are still not compliant? And which one of us has troubling grasping the reality. I'll give you some time to think maybe find something else in their country’s history. Because once a transgresser always a transgresser right? Lord knows those saffas are the only ones to have a checkers past.


PS crap analogy for a spear tackle. Who's the tackler in this analogy? The govt or the boks? Because I'm pretty sure the offender gets the sanction. Because if its the boks then surely the wada are sanctioning the boks and taking the boks to CAS arbitration. Or do we penalise the the country every time a player spear tackles someone?

B
Barry 154 days ago

It's inarguable (because it's literal truth) that they aren't signed up to the current WADA protocols.


The boks argue that it's not their fault and it's in fact their governments fault. World rugby is threatening them with sanctions (doesn't this sound familiar!?). They have brought the matter to CAS to see if they can get a pass as the issue is not with their rugby union but their countries government.


Irrespective of this, the boks aren't compliant. Bottom line. It's really not difficult to grasp.


A spear tackle could be intentional or unintentional. Either way, it ends with a neck break. The same net result.

P
PDV 157 days ago

Dear Rugbypass. Why oh why do you give this failed collections officer a platform to spread his anti-SA drivel? I know you want the website traffic but he hurts your reputation with his ill informed trolling.

M
Mr 157 days ago

Not trying to wind anyone up, forget the article for a minute but say the AB's win the next world cup, so that's 4 each for the Boks and AB's, the AB's currently have 20 Tri-nations/RC to the Boks 4. SA are a great rugby nation when it comes to world cups, but outside of those, the stats show they haven't delivered as they should have. Good thing with international rugby, there's always another game, the Boks have plenty of opportunities to improve their consistency, I hope they do as most of their fans are amazing and passionate, they deserve to be backing an 80% winning team

B
Barry 157 days ago

SA are masters of the one-off tournament played every 4 years. It’s all they measure themselves by. The utter muck they play is designed only for tournament rugby and grinding out wins. That success must help unite a divided country which is a plus. The rugby they play, isn’t a plus and there’s no incentive for it to change.


They’ve never dominated the sport at any point. Ever.


Going 50 mins in a RWC final without scoring (or even attempting to score) is the nadir. Going on to win that same final, is a stain on the sport.

s
sf 158 days ago

I agree and have always know this to be the case , they stroll through world cups then claim themselves to be the best when they lack in all other areas. They lack consistency at all levels of rugby . They left super rugby because they were sick of being embarrassed and exposed thinking the northern hemisphere would be a cake walk then continue getting exposed. The World Cup is a flawed competition where teams like the shitboks can go on and win it when the world knows they are garbage. I can’t wait for the nations championship to start and the World Cup to fade away into the background.

B
Bob Salad II 158 days ago

Lol. What a great riposte! I’m sure Bok fans are livid!!

A
Ace 157 days ago

You’re sure? Don’t forget to feed your pet unicorn.

B
Ben 157 days ago

Not really, we dont take much note of this Douche bag Kiwi….sad, because we really like ALL the other Kiwi’s just @Ben Smith that sucks!

D
DA 158 days ago

I did not even read his vomit that he spews out. He’s a prick

W
Wyn 158 days ago

This must be the most insane thing I have ever read. The ignorance about South African rugby is amazing.


Ben I don't know if you are a rugby journalist but reading this I have my doubts.


Just on your first point about schoolboy rugby. You mentioned the last two world schools tournaments but don't mention the first two. You know the two where five New Zealand schools played against South African schools. The New Zealand schools only managed one draw and nine losses. Some of the losses were big, 93-5, 73-26, 54-0, 62-7 and so on. Even a 59-25 loss against a SA school who only has 350 boys. Ouch!


I can go on, but you are the socalled journalist and I am not going to do your job for you.

s
sf 158 days ago

I remember that. Those were tier 2 and 3 teams that were sent not the top nz schools. Fail !

A
Ace 158 days ago

He’s a failed accountant who became a failed analyst.

C
Charles 158 days ago

Hey Ben. Online comments and posts never reflect the true nature of anyone. Why don’t you get on a plane to come and spend 2 weeks in South Africa and experience what the people and country are really like. If you then choose to continue your online vitriol against South Africa and their fans in general, so be it, but I suspect you may have a totally different take on things after that.

S
SG 158 days ago

This is disingenuous. Ben isn’t disparaging or disrespectful whatsoever towards South Africa, the Springboks or it’s general fans. He is merely stating facts about the success, or lack thereof, of it’s rugby programme, despite all the “bark” from Rassie and the most patriotic of Springbok supporters. South Africa IS a beautiful country with wonderful people but that is separate from the aggressive rhetoric of some fans.

T
TI 158 days ago

Knew the author by the headline alone.

Yawn. Next.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search