Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Blues saved the worst for last but it won't change many All Black selections

(Photos by Hannah Peters/Getty Images/Joe Allison/Getty Images and Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The Blues saved their worst performance of the year for last as the Crusaders stormed to the inaugural Super Rugby Pacific title.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a cruel twist of fate for the wheels to come off for the Blues at the most important time in the midst of 15 straight wins.

The lineout was a shambles, the handling was poor and the decision-making was panicked. The exit kicking did not chew off enough metres and everything played into the Crusaders’ hands.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 19

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 19

Despite this, the Blues valiantly held on in the opening 20 minutes as wave after wave of Crusaders attack threatened to find the try line.

Leicester Fainga’anuku was bundled into touch in the left-hand corner just two minutes into game. Codie Taylor almost scored in the exact same place only for another last-ditch effort to deny him. Fainga’anuku was then held up again, resulting in a relieving goal line drop out.

That the Crusaders only had a Richie Mo’unga drop goal for their dominance in the first quarter of the game should have bolstered the Blues’ spirits, but the onslaught continued as the hosts could not, for the life of them, arrest control of the game.

The Crusaders barrelled forward runner after forward runner into the opposition’s defensive line before a forward pod finally swung the ball out the back to Mo’unga to link for a wide raid.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a rinse and repeat formula that the Blues didn’t have an answer for. Their defence was like slow melting ice under the pressure of the Crusaders’ heat, with the visitors continually making metres upfield and were rarely stopped behind the gain line.

If the Blues got any kind of penalty relief, it was short-lived as their lineout throw was turned over more often than not and the chance to build any phases was squandered before it began.

Star Blues midfielders Roger Tuivasa-Sheck and Rieko Ioane combined to break away downfield from a scrum play after 20 minutes, and Beauden Barrett supported with a well-weighted chip kick, forcing Sevu Reece to take the ball into touch five metres out.

The momentum swing the Blues needed was there, only for hooker Kurt Eklund’s throw to be stolen and the line cleared. The next lineout, this time 22 metres out, resulted in a Crusaders penalty for a double blown opportunity.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues desperately missed the experience of Patrick Tuipulotu at lineout time. Last year’s club captain deserved to be in a game like that after all he has given the franchise, but unfortunately his sabbatical came at the wrong time for the Blues.

While Eklund will cop the brunt of the blame for the lineout debacle, the question has to be asked why the Blues’ top lineout target for the entire season, James Tucker, was not in the line-up.

Just who was running it was unclear, and perhaps the experience of Luke Romano on the field from the start would have been of more use.

Eklund’s throwing couldn’t find a target and Finlay Christie’s popgun exit kicks were so short that all the Crusaders had to do was keep plugging corners and the Blues would find a way to give them back cheap possession in quick fashion.

The Crusaders had 62 percent possession and 65 percent territory in that telling first half. If the Blues escaped only 6-0 down they had a higher chance of rescuing the game, but Bryn Hall’s try 15 seconds from halftime after 17 phases was an absolute killer blow.

Related

It was amazing the way the Crusaders players turned up for the occasion at Eden Park, with a desire to play and a focus dialled in to the job at hand.

The team was galvanised, prepared and played with heart, above all else. They love playing for the Crusaders and Scott Robertson. They understand who, and what, they are playing for to a level that simply can’t be replicated elsewhere.

We saw Crusaders midfielders David Havili and Jack Goodhue put on some dominant hits and pressure the Blues backs into gain line losses. The Crusaders backs were clinical and accurate with their passing and kicking for the majority of the match.

Mo’unga, Havili and Goodhue would be your 10-12-13 All Blacks combination if you were picking solely off this game. However, it won’t be and rightly so, because this wasn’t test rugby.

Ireland’s lineout won’t operate at 47 percent, their backfield won’t drop every contested ball and you won’t get nearly 65 percent possession. You won’t force them into 209 tackles, nearly double the defensive load of your own side.

In this game, the Crusaders were not put under any pressure at all, which doesn’t tell us anything more about Mo’unga or Havili’s ability to handle it or pull a side out from under it. The Blues capitulated and the Crusaders did what they had to.

For that reason, Barrett must still be the starting All Black first-five against Ireland, with Mo’unga his back-up. Barrett’s speed is back, his running game is electric and he must be given the platform to use it, which wasn’t there in the final.

In terms of the midfield, Tuivasa-Sheck is unlikely to nail down the starting job at No 12 after that. He needs time and will likely be used on New Zealand’s bench when Stephen Perofeta is carried as the 10 and 15 cover.

The experienced Goodhue will likely slot straight back into the All Black midfield with Anton Lienert-Brown out, perhaps at second-five where he was used throughout 2020.

The shame about this move is that his passing and offloading game on the edge is what makes him a brilliant centre, with his ability to free up his outside man. At No 12, this aspect of his game is lost as he is asked to carry into traffic alot.

If Goodhue is used at second-five, Rieko Ioane will get his chance to play at centre. If not, Ioane could be back on the bench, with Caleb Clarke and Leicester Fainga’anuku vying for the left wing.

The shame about this Blues performance is they barely fired a shot. We didn’t see most of their plans because they couldn’t execute for the first 50 minutes of the game.

The million-dollar backline was rarely seen because the forward pack went broke when they were needed most.

For the Crusaders, they have been a special team for six years and, again, they rallied for another title, this time against the odds as underdogs for a memorable win.

Whatever happens with the All Blacks won’t change the fact that the Crusaders has achieved an unprecedented amount of success, which has easily been the best era of rugby at the franchise, setting the bar even higher than what came before.

The Crusaders win another title but it won’t change much for Ian Foster when he picks his first 23 to play Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
p
peter_qld 883 days ago

To the panel (JT et al), no one ever picks an International side based on one game.

b
bobsyouruncle 885 days ago

Great article, agree on most points. Doubt we will see RTS in the first 2 games atleast. Interesting you have Perofeta instead of Mounga on the bench. I understand the need to cover your spine but I feel with Will Jordan and Beauden starting we can afford for the specialist 10 in the 22 Jersey. I would have Havili and Ioane as the midfield for the first test, with Goodhue as midfield cover from the bench. Havili is so skillful and is looking more physical on defence but questions remain after is woeful post Fiji/Tonga/Bledisloe form. If he starts im praying Fozzie utilises his skillset instead of getting him to crash it up against way bigger guys.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh
Search