Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Blues saved the worst for last but it won't change many All Black selections

(Photos by Hannah Peters/Getty Images/Joe Allison/Getty Images and Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The Blues saved their worst performance of the year for last as the Crusaders stormed to the inaugural Super Rugby Pacific title.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a cruel twist of fate for the wheels to come off for the Blues at the most important time in the midst of 15 straight wins.

The lineout was a shambles, the handling was poor and the decision-making was panicked. The exit kicking did not chew off enough metres and everything played into the Crusaders’ hands.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 19

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 19

Despite this, the Blues valiantly held on in the opening 20 minutes as wave after wave of Crusaders attack threatened to find the try line.

Leicester Fainga’anuku was bundled into touch in the left-hand corner just two minutes into game. Codie Taylor almost scored in the exact same place only for another last-ditch effort to deny him. Fainga’anuku was then held up again, resulting in a relieving goal line drop out.

That the Crusaders only had a Richie Mo’unga drop goal for their dominance in the first quarter of the game should have bolstered the Blues’ spirits, but the onslaught continued as the hosts could not, for the life of them, arrest control of the game.

The Crusaders barrelled forward runner after forward runner into the opposition’s defensive line before a forward pod finally swung the ball out the back to Mo’unga to link for a wide raid.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a rinse and repeat formula that the Blues didn’t have an answer for. Their defence was like slow melting ice under the pressure of the Crusaders’ heat, with the visitors continually making metres upfield and were rarely stopped behind the gain line.

If the Blues got any kind of penalty relief, it was short-lived as their lineout throw was turned over more often than not and the chance to build any phases was squandered before it began.

Star Blues midfielders Roger Tuivasa-Sheck and Rieko Ioane combined to break away downfield from a scrum play after 20 minutes, and Beauden Barrett supported with a well-weighted chip kick, forcing Sevu Reece to take the ball into touch five metres out.

The momentum swing the Blues needed was there, only for hooker Kurt Eklund’s throw to be stolen and the line cleared. The next lineout, this time 22 metres out, resulted in a Crusaders penalty for a double blown opportunity.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues desperately missed the experience of Patrick Tuipulotu at lineout time. Last year’s club captain deserved to be in a game like that after all he has given the franchise, but unfortunately his sabbatical came at the wrong time for the Blues.

While Eklund will cop the brunt of the blame for the lineout debacle, the question has to be asked why the Blues’ top lineout target for the entire season, James Tucker, was not in the line-up.

Just who was running it was unclear, and perhaps the experience of Luke Romano on the field from the start would have been of more use.

Eklund’s throwing couldn’t find a target and Finlay Christie’s popgun exit kicks were so short that all the Crusaders had to do was keep plugging corners and the Blues would find a way to give them back cheap possession in quick fashion.

The Crusaders had 62 percent possession and 65 percent territory in that telling first half. If the Blues escaped only 6-0 down they had a higher chance of rescuing the game, but Bryn Hall’s try 15 seconds from halftime after 17 phases was an absolute killer blow.

Related

It was amazing the way the Crusaders players turned up for the occasion at Eden Park, with a desire to play and a focus dialled in to the job at hand.

The team was galvanised, prepared and played with heart, above all else. They love playing for the Crusaders and Scott Robertson. They understand who, and what, they are playing for to a level that simply can’t be replicated elsewhere.

We saw Crusaders midfielders David Havili and Jack Goodhue put on some dominant hits and pressure the Blues backs into gain line losses. The Crusaders backs were clinical and accurate with their passing and kicking for the majority of the match.

Mo’unga, Havili and Goodhue would be your 10-12-13 All Blacks combination if you were picking solely off this game. However, it won’t be and rightly so, because this wasn’t test rugby.

Ireland’s lineout won’t operate at 47 percent, their backfield won’t drop every contested ball and you won’t get nearly 65 percent possession. You won’t force them into 209 tackles, nearly double the defensive load of your own side.

In this game, the Crusaders were not put under any pressure at all, which doesn’t tell us anything more about Mo’unga or Havili’s ability to handle it or pull a side out from under it. The Blues capitulated and the Crusaders did what they had to.

For that reason, Barrett must still be the starting All Black first-five against Ireland, with Mo’unga his back-up. Barrett’s speed is back, his running game is electric and he must be given the platform to use it, which wasn’t there in the final.

In terms of the midfield, Tuivasa-Sheck is unlikely to nail down the starting job at No 12 after that. He needs time and will likely be used on New Zealand’s bench when Stephen Perofeta is carried as the 10 and 15 cover.

The experienced Goodhue will likely slot straight back into the All Black midfield with Anton Lienert-Brown out, perhaps at second-five where he was used throughout 2020.

The shame about this move is that his passing and offloading game on the edge is what makes him a brilliant centre, with his ability to free up his outside man. At No 12, this aspect of his game is lost as he is asked to carry into traffic alot.

If Goodhue is used at second-five, Rieko Ioane will get his chance to play at centre. If not, Ioane could be back on the bench, with Caleb Clarke and Leicester Fainga’anuku vying for the left wing.

The shame about this Blues performance is they barely fired a shot. We didn’t see most of their plans because they couldn’t execute for the first 50 minutes of the game.

The million-dollar backline was rarely seen because the forward pack went broke when they were needed most.

For the Crusaders, they have been a special team for six years and, again, they rallied for another title, this time against the odds as underdogs for a memorable win.

Whatever happens with the All Blacks won’t change the fact that the Crusaders has achieved an unprecedented amount of success, which has easily been the best era of rugby at the franchise, setting the bar even higher than what came before.

The Crusaders win another title but it won’t change much for Ian Foster when he picks his first 23 to play Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
p
peter_qld 914 days ago

To the panel (JT et al), no one ever picks an International side based on one game.

b
bobsyouruncle 916 days ago

Great article, agree on most points. Doubt we will see RTS in the first 2 games atleast. Interesting you have Perofeta instead of Mounga on the bench. I understand the need to cover your spine but I feel with Will Jordan and Beauden starting we can afford for the specialist 10 in the 22 Jersey. I would have Havili and Ioane as the midfield for the first test, with Goodhue as midfield cover from the bench. Havili is so skillful and is looking more physical on defence but questions remain after is woeful post Fiji/Tonga/Bledisloe form. If he starts im praying Fozzie utilises his skillset instead of getting him to crash it up against way bigger guys.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search