Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The O'Driscoll verdict on Peyper getting Champions Cup final gig

(Photo by Bob Bradford/CameraSport via Getty Images)

Brian O’Driscoll has had his say on this weekend’s latest Leinster versus La Rochelle European encounter having a South African referee in charge rather than an official from England. Saturday’s Heineken Champions Cup final in Dublin will be the third year in succession that these Irish and French rivals have clashed at the business end of the tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s Matthew Carley was the referee for the 2021 semi-final in La Rochelle while Wayne Barnes, his fellow countryman, was in charge of last year’s final encounter in Marseille. Both these games were won by the French side.

However, rather than appoint Barnes for this latest Leinster-La Rochelle decider, EPCR decided to have him referee Friday night’s Challenge Cup final between Glasgow and Toulon and instead have Jaco Peyper on the whistle for the Champions Cup final the next day.

Video Spacer

An update on the global club competition | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

An update on the global club competition | The Breakdown

It was May 12 when it was confirmed that Peyper would take charge, creating history as the first South African to referee an EPCR final and the fixture sees him return to Dublin just nine weeks after he generated headlines for his sending off of England’s Freddie Steward after a Guinness Six Nations collision with Ireland’s Hugo Keenan – a red card that was rescinded at a follow-up midweek disciplinary hearing.

O’Driscoll reckoned it was a good thing that EPCR had given Peyper the Champions Cup final assignment. “I can’t say I have studied the life out of him in the last number of years,” he told RugbyPass. “Obviously, he dips in and out of European rugby and we see more of him internationally.

Related

“It’s pretty clear, it’s striking the balance between being conversational, respecting the captains but feeling very much as though you are in control as well and he has earned the right to get himself a final. The fact that these two teams played last year and Wayne Barnes was in the middle, it was a smart decision by EPCR to give it to another referee.

“And so, yeah, I can’t say I have got any major hang-ups about his game but then I am not scrutinising him the way video analysts are in different respective teams, so maybe my intel is not as good as theirs.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Players and teams do analysis on the referees as much as they do on the opposition. They are an integral part of the game and how it flows and all referees are hot on certain aspects of the game and will always set their stall out very early on with a quick penalty be it for not rolling away or staying onside. They always have their own little pet peeves within games.

“So, you have to play the referee as much as you play the opposition and show the picture that you know he is going to look for. You also get messages from them beforehand in the dressing room, so you need to adhere to exactly what that is and what they are saying and in conjunction with their assistant referees.

“It’s such an important part of the professional game that you are playing the opposition, but you are also playing the referee. Hopefully, he [Peyper] will be the quietest man on the field but invariably there will be someone who will feel some decisions have gone the wrong way or he has leaned too heavily on one side versus the other. That happens in every game, not just in finals.”

  • BT Sport is home of the Heineken Champions Cup. Watch this year’s final between Leinster and La Rochelle from 4pm, Saturday, May 20, live and exclusively on BT Sport 2. Visit btsport.com/rugby
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search