Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Bulls have found a new weapon but regaining South African power still a tall ask

Handre Pollard and Jesse Kriel (Photos/Gettys Images)

The Bulls opened their Super Rugby campaign at home in Pretoria with an emphatic 40-3 statement win over the troubled Stormers, a complete reversal of the pre-season clash between the two sides, and in the process uncovered a new weapon and an old one – Rosko Specman and astute tactical kicking.

ADVERTISEMENT

The addition of Blitzboks Sevens star Specman proved a masterstroke as he knifed the Stormers to bits twice inside the first quarter of the game. The speed Specman brings, even at 29-years-old, gives the Bulls a lethal finisher who can create all on his own, or roam around and work off the ball-players to create mismatches as he did on his second try.

Specman showed an invaluable ability to provide pressure on kick-chase with his top-level speed and complete his tackles with a high success rate, an undervalued part of his game which the Bulls will use off the back of first five-eighth Handre Pollard’s long driving kicks. His reading of the game from the backfield is still green, his rolling coverage will need to improve but overall this looks like a boom signing.

The return of former Stormer Duane Vermeulen to Super Rugby in a Bulls jersey has bolstered the pack with a world-class eight, and he showed that in the first half an hour with over 60 metres on eight carries.

More impressive was the back row as a unit, with Hanro Liebenberg and Ruan Steenkamp in combination with Vermeulen forcing six turnovers and imposing themselves on the Stormers in defence as part of a brutal Bulls line, while veteran hooker Schalk Brits also impressed in his short return before being forced from the field.

With the Bulls coaching staff not being appointed until mid-way through the pre-season, even with the large number of quality signings, this kind of dominant result wasn’t expected.

Video Spacer

They may still be benefitting from processes installed by John Mitchell last year as the new coaching staff has had little time to work with the squad, but the Stormers were objectively awful and could not find an answer to the tactical kicking of the Bulls halves.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Stormers’ backfield coverage was all over the shop, allowing the likes of Pollard, Warrick Gelant and Embrose Papier to tactically kick the Stormers out of the game. The Bulls halves pairing kicked more than double that of the Stormers, and did so on a third of their possessions.

Pollard played the corners and took the space when offered, using a deft chip off set-piece to set up a try for Jesse Kriel early in the second half to put the game beyond a shadow of a doubt. The Springbok centre nearly had a flawless game, distributing wisely and defending well until a few errors crept in late in the game.

The Stormers have as many on-field issues as they do off it, with defensive breakdowns a constant worry not to mention basic execution errors. At 28-3 early in the second half, the Bulls basically shut down the game by taking every available three and played for territory for nearly fifty minutes.

The third try to Bulls winger John-Ben Kotze contained nice lead-up work but the Stormers defence made horrendous reads, with nearly every player out of sync and playing outside of any visible system and without trust in each other.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite the visitors being laden with Springbok talent, it would be dangerous to put too much weight on beating this Stormers outfit by a big score. The Lions remain king in the South African conference until proven otherwise, and the Sharks are building, proving last year they can go on the road and win in New Zealand, something the Bulls have struggled with in recent years.

The Bulls haven’t won an overseas game since 2016, in over two years, and haven’t won on New Zealand soil since 2013. The first test will come next week when they travel to Argentina to play the Jaguares before key conference games against the Lions and Sharks.

If the Bulls can continue their form through this early block of four games, it could set them up for a favourable run into playoff qualification. Their Australasian tour isn’t due into Round 13, by which point they will have built into the season and determined much of their conference fate.

The one factor of the Bulls’ game that holds the most weight out of the performance is the defensive showing, limiting the visitors to three points and conceding no tries, which gives the strongest indication that they may turn the corner in 2019.

They will need to take that defensive resolve to Buenos Aires.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Poorfour 39 minutes ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Scotland's senior players 'have gone to a different level' in quest for top-three finish Scotland's senior players 'have gone to a different level' in quest for top-three finish
Search