Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'The call went out there to take the shot' says All Blacks halfback TJ Perenara

TJ Perenara and Beauden Barrett discuss options against the Springboks in Wellington.

The frantic finish that saw the Springboks edge the All Blacks 36-34 in a cliffhanger has many fans and pundits alike questioning why the All Blacks didn’t opt to take a drop goal.

ADVERTISEMENT

The decision to attack the edge after the buzzer proved costly as pressure from a rushing Aphiwe Dyanti caused Damian McKenzie to spill the ball and effectively end the match. Some resolute goal-line defence by the Springboks in the last 10 minutes repelled the men in black time and time again, where the All Blacks didn’t look like taking a shot for three.

Post-match, reserve halfback TJ Perenara explained the call was made but then a change of plans were made.

“The call went out to take a shot there,” explained TJ Perenara.

“We went to set for it but then we got a picture where we have a three-on-two and for me, there are a lot more things that can go wrong in a drop goal than can in a three-on-two.

“If we execute that we are not having this conversation about a drop goal.

Despite the play not coming up with the desired try, Perenara believes he would do the same thing again if offered the same situation.

“But the decision to set up for it did definitely happen. It was a call that got given but if I was out there I would have made the same call and looking back on it, I still think it was the right call.”

Steve Hansen conceded that the drop goal would have been a good option.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Maybe a drop goal, which we have a set-up for, would have been a good option however they tried to score a try.

“[Losing] doesn’t happen often but it is important that we learn something from it otherwise the whole thing is a waste of time. But we have to give South Africa a lot of credit. They came out with a plan to put pressure on us and they did that.”

“They played particularly well and took all the chances that were there and if you take them and score five tries you have done a great job,” he said.

“We were disappointed there are areas we will have to work on and at the same time we got a team that put us under a lot of pressure. We are trying to put some new structures and try a few things and South Africa asked questions about those structures and I think we will be a better team because of that.

ADVERTISEMENT

The win was the Springboks first win against the All Blacks since 2014, and first in New Zealand since 2009. The epic encounter between the old rivals sets up a fascinating return fixture in Pretoria on October 6.

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 3 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

2 Go to comments
J
JW 17 minutes ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

22 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks player ratings vs Italy | Autumn Nations Series All Blacks player ratings vs Italy
Search