Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The changes Borthwick has noticed in England skipper Owen Farrell

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Steve Borthwick has outlined the leadership difference he has noticed in Owen Farrell this year compared to when he previously worked with the England skipper. The current head coach, who took over the role last December when Eddie Jones was sacked, had served as forwards coach from 2016 through to the pandemic suspension of the 2020 Guinness Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

The coach switched over to Leicester, becoming head coach at Welford Road and guiding them to Gallagher Premiership glory in June 2022 against Farrell’s Saracens before taking up the RFU offer six months later to succeed Jones as England boss.

That resulted in him going back to work with Farrell at Test level and there were rocky moments encountered last spring during an underwhelming Six Nations, most notably the dropping of the captain to the bench for the round four championship match with France.

Video Spacer

World Cup warm up highlights | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

World Cup warm up highlights | The Breakdown

However, Borthwick believes the pair have now reached an understanding that can serve England well as they look to stop their current results rot and produce at the upcoming Rugby World Cup in France.

“There is a three-year gap in my experience of working with Owen,” began Borthwick, who has named Farrell as his World Cup skipper and has selected him to start at fly-half in this Saturday’s Summer Nations Series clash with Wales at Twickenham.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
4
Draws
0
Wins
1
Average Points scored
17
16
First try wins
60%
Home team wins
80%

“We have discussed what has changed and developed and I think he has changed through that period, as we all have. He has changed his leadership style, there is that balance. He still has that inner competitiveness that we all see in him. He has also developed the ability to recognise when that coolness and calmness is required.

“And he has added a lot of skills to his leadership. Through the Six Nations, there was a period of he and I understanding how each other was working, trying to understand each other. Now we are pretty clear how we want to work together.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Farrell led England to the World Cup final in Japan four years ago and ahead of the latest RWC campaign beginning on September 9 versus Argentina in Marseille, he said: “The dream is always to be in the big game at the end and to go as far as you can. All our focus is on that.”

It will be a steep climb to get there. England under Borthwick have won just twice in six outings, but the increasingly loud outside noise about their struggles isn’t being entertained inside the camp.

“Whether we are going in as favourites or going in under the radar we will hopefully use it to our advantage either way. We are where we are at the minute, we are working hard quietly to be the best that we can be.

“Tournament rugby is a lot about pressure, the World Cup. It’s bigger than everything else you play. There is more eyes, there’s more noise, there is more outside noise especially and the nice thing maybe at times for us is that we might not have as much of that. I don’t know. It might be in a different way. Who knows?

ADVERTISEMENT

“But the big thing for me is focus on what is in camp. We focus on what we can control and not let the other stuff creep in and use it well. That is what we will be doing. We will be making sure we don’t get in our own way because of external factors that don’t really matter in I’m honest. We’ll look forward to try and get the best out of ourselves either way.

“The whole thing for the team has been to get the most out of ourselves now. We know what a big tournament is coming up and we are looking forward to it.

Related

“The opportunity is brilliant for us but all our focus is on making sure we are becoming a better rugby team now and we have been doing that over the past few weeks and now the squad has been selected we can really rip into that even more now.”

World Cup 2023 will be Farrell’s third after wildly different previous campaigns, England enduring pool stage elimination in 2015 before coming good four years later in Japan to reach the final after a run that included a spectacular semi-final success to dethrone New Zealand, the back-to-back 2011 and 2015 champions.

“It’s not just the last World Cup, there has been a few now that I have been involved in before and they have been both ends of the spectrum,” said Farrell when asked what influence his previous RWC experiences might now wield on England in France.

“I’m not trying to be anything I’m not. Like Steve has said, we’re trying to be the best version of ourselves. Obviously there is learning, people learn all the time. It’s not a matter of sitting down and thinking right what went the last World Cup.

“Of course there is reflection but hopefully a lot of that reflection would have gone into the last four years, not just popping up and now ready to go when the next one comes around. I want to be myself, I want to enjoy it, I want is to be the best version of us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search