Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Chiefs' Damian McKenzie problem laid bare

Damian McKenzie of the Chiefs receives medical attention during the round one Super Rugby Pacific match between the Chiefs and the Crusaders at FMG Stadium Waikato, on February 23, 2024, in Hamilton, New Zealand. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The Chiefs weren’t able to travel to Christchurch and beat the Crusaders without their star No 10 Damian McKenzie.

ADVERTISEMENT

In round one against the Crusaders, McKenzie was forced from the field with injury and without him the visitors stormed back and nearly won the match.

The stark difference in the McKenzie-less Chiefs was laid bare on Sky Sport’s The Breakdown with a statistical view which showed how much the Chiefs’ attack struggles without him.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I just think this guy brings…. and look at those stats, I asked three times if they were real,” Kirwan told The Breakdown panel.

“Points scored, 166 with Damian, 32 without, the stats are incredible.”

With McKenzie on the field the Chiefs have kicked more, but at the same time have held possession for longer periods leading to double the amount of carries.

When it came to metres made, they have 4.5 metres per carry with him on the field versus 3.5 without. The number of defenders beaten by the side was nearly four times larger, 116 versus 35.

The Chiefs started young Taranaki first five Josh Jacomb with Josh Ioane deputising from the bench on Friday night.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former All Black wing Sir John Kirwan theorised that the Chiefs struggle adjusting to the more traditional style of the other No 10s due to McKenzie’s unique play.

“The thing I love about Damian McKenzie and the thing I don’t think we notice, is he plays the game so differently,” Kirwan said.

“Non-traditional stand-off, runs laterally, I keep referring to him playing like a rugby league stand-off. He’s bought some X-factor too.

“When you play with someone like that, your attack gets used to it. When you take them out, I think it’s very difficult.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ex-All Black Jeff Wilson believed that the loss of Brad Weber was also having an impact.

When the Chiefs are without McKenzie and Weber, he thought that the Chiefs don’t have multiple ‘playmakers’ who can create opportunities.

“There are times in games when you need creative players to spark something, for try assists, take the ball to the line,” Wilson said.

“I don’t think we should ignore the piece of the puzzle that isn’t there as well in Brad Weber.

“How experienced he is, the things he used to do very well. Great cover defender, his pass was fantastic, his kicking was accurate.

“He was always that player in support. He was a sniper with the ball-in-hand. Very, very quick.

“All of a sudden, Xavier Roe is more of a passing halfback. If you don’t have someone who can create off phase play, particularly in the middle of the park, that’s what the Chiefs didn’t do.

“They counter-attacked very well, brought the ball back really well, but when they got into the middle of the field, it was ‘how do we now breach? How do we turn this into points?’ and that’s where they let themselves down.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
I
Isaac 263 days ago

it’s funny how they all say because dmack wasn’t there thats why they lost but doesn’t look at the half-back who was the main reason we lost hew slow he can’t defend leaked 2 tries bevause of him look what happened when ratima come on the field josh jacomb and ratimq tore it up then Josh ioane come on and threw a bloody intercept pass that anyone could see was coming so no its not because dmack wasn’t there its because we had a terrible half starting and a terribleb1st five coming off the bench

A
Andrew 263 days ago

Jacombe is from the Naki.

T
Tyrone 263 days ago

the question also has to be asked, why was he rested for this match? pre-season, resting your star 10 for a match against the crusaders would be unthinkable, especially given we play MP the following week.
did this call come from the abs?(ex crusaders)🤔

D
David 264 days ago

To lose to a desperate Crusaders in Chch is hardly a watershed game. More telling was the inability to close out the game v the Reds. Josh Jacomb plays for Taranaki not Waikato. He needs to play again v MP and continue to rest DMac.

F
Forward pass 264 days ago

What a dumb article. Can sides never develop players? J Jacomb did some great stuff and will benifit massively from that game and the pressure he handled well. Pathetic articles like this just constantly rubbish rugby. Good one.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search