Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Clive Woodward verdict on Borthwick's first England squad

(Photo by Adam Davy/PA Images via Getty Images)

It has been such a busy rugby week that we have only finally gotten around now to what Clive Woodward made of the first England squad named by Steve Borthwick. It was Monday morning at Twickenham when the new head coach announced the squad of 36 that will assemble at Pennyhill Park from next Monday for a five-day training camp, and it was the following day when 2003 World Cup winner Woodward shared his thoughts in his latest Sportsmail column.

ADVERTISEMENT

His reaction? Believing that the England play had become far too slow in recent times, Woodward was thrilled that Borthwick included players with pace that Jones would allegedly have never picked. The ex-national team coach also gave his seal of approval for the recall of veteran prop Dan Cole more than three years after he was last capped, while he also applauded the confirmation of Owen Farrell as team skipper.

There was even a word about Jones being appointed as the Australia coach, Woodward warning that if the Wallabies knock England out of the World Cup later this year that the blame will fall at the door of RFU CEO Bill Sweeney.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

First, though, the issue of speed. “This first squad selection of England’s new era under Steve Borthwick proves not only that he wants to pick a team with pace, but also promises a stark contrast to the Eddie Jones era,” began Woodward.

“Jones would never have named the likes of Ollie Hassell-Collins and Ben Earl for the Six Nations, as Borthwick did. Under the Australian, England became far too slow from one to 15. To win a World Cup, England can’t rely on brute power alone. They are not South Africa. There must be a speed and dynamism to the players who are selected.

Related

“England’s overall approach and gameplan needed to change radically, which is why I’m so pleased by Borthwick’s selection. It is very positive… It means I’m hugely excited about the Calcutta Cup clash with Scotland in the first round of the Six Nations. That would not have been the case if Jones had still been in charge.”

Referenced the Cole recall, he said: “I don’t mind that at all. It shows age is no barrier and that form is rewarded.” Then came his affirmation of skipper Farrell. “Borthwick’s decision to make Owen Farrell captain is the right one and I would absolutely have him starting at No10 during the Six Nations. He must begin the Scotland game there.”

ADVERTISEMENT

That said, there was criticism of the disciplinary process that enabled Farrell to scratch the final week of his current ban by successfully attending tackle school. “Rugby’s disciplinary process is making the game look ridiculous… Rugby needs to find real clarity and get away from the idea that bans can be reduced by taking a tackling course, admitting guilt, or having good previous behaviour. It’s embarrassing.”

The final word went on Jones and the Wallabies. “Australia have made a seriously big call by going back to Jones. The decision made me smile because Jones’ return to the international arena does add extra spice to what is already a huge World Cup year.

“England were right to get rid of Jones, but if he comes back to haunt them then big questions will still be asked of the RFU and chief executive Bill Sweeney. There will be finger-pointing if England get knocked out of the tournament by Jones’ Australia. If that happens, Sweeney would be very exposed.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
J
Jack 699 days ago

"England were right to get rid of Jones, but if he comes back to haunt them then big questions will still be asked of the RFU and chief executive Bill Sweeney." Is this not an example of cognitive dissonance....Is Clive alright?

F
Flankly 701 days ago

Sir Clive "Often Wrong, Never in Doubt" Woodward broadcasting his dubious assessments again. And as usual they are a mix of stating the obvious and promoting his biases and stylistic preferences as some kind of higher wisdom. Suggesting that SA does not have pace, when multiple SA outside backs are setting the world alight, is a typically stupid SCW take. He's like that stopped watch that tells the right time twice a day - if he keeps repeating his little narrative then occasionally reality will coincide with it, and prove him "right". Give me Eddie any day, with his better England win rate, and despite his annoying yapping.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

TRENDING
TRENDING Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising
Search