Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The conversation Harlequins had with Marcus Smith over missed kick

(Photo by Christopher Lee/Getty Images)

Harlequins skipper Stephan Lewies has claimed that last Saturday’s costly missed kick from Marcus Smith wasn’t mentioned in their Monday squad review of their agonising Heineken Champions Cup review, but senior coach Tabai Matson suggested a conversation was had between him and his star out-half in the aftermath of the now-infamous conversion attempt. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The failure to kick the two points after a Louis Lynagh try left Harlequins eliminated from Europe on an aggregate score of 60-59 versus Montpellier, but Smith has apparently moved on quickly from that disappointment knowing that Gallagher Premiership leaders Leicester are next up at The Stoop on Saturday. 

“He is absolutely fine,” said Lewies when asked how Smith has been in wake of the missed conversion that was described as a straightforward kick for the England out-half. “He understands the nature of sport. The amount of games he has won for us in that situation at the end is ridiculous. 

Video Spacer

Mike Brown | Rugby Roots

Video Spacer

Mike Brown | Rugby Roots

“Before the game, if you told him you would give him five out of six kicks today he probably would have taken that. He can’t be too hard on himself, to be honest, and we’re happy to see that he is just preparing the boys for a good performance this weekend again and pushing to strive and get better all the time. It’s brilliant to see a youngster like that and his maturity for his age is unbelievable.

“We reviewed the game quite hard to see where we failed and I don’t think the kick was brought up once. That is not where we failed. Where their tries came from we struggled to exit, they put pressure on us there.

Related

“That was more the stuff we reviewed, our mistakes letting them into our 22 and giving them points. And then when we were dominant in the scrum we didn’t convert that into points – that was a discussion point more than anything else after the game,” continued the skipper, who added that he won’t be in the least bit surprised if Smith and Harlequins are back in the winners’ enclosure next weekend.

“That is what the good players, the good teams do, they bounce back. We all bounce back as a team and in saying that, if you look at that first-half performance (against Montpellier), it was probably some of our best rugby of this season. There is disappointment at not going through but in terms of our performance on the day it was still a clinical and good performance. Where we failed was in the first leg.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Senior coach Matson later gave his take on how Smith was dealing with his missed kick, explaining there was no room for self-pity in this game. Harlequins’ collective reaction at their Guilford training ground, for instance, was to go and play some cricket following the review of their European exit.

“He has to be (getting on with it). If you’re as successful a goal-kicker and game leader as him you just can’t dwell on things for too long. We did have that conversation. He moves on really quickly which is an important trait for someone in his position and with the lot of responsibility we give him.

“You forget he has played more than 100 games of Premiership rugby and all the other accolades he has got. All those experiences are really important and what you want him to do is learn from them, whether that is for a big Test match for England or for us in the playoffs in a couple of months, hopefully.

“I don’t think anyone who has become world-class has had an easy ride. Exits like this are things to learn from. There is only really one way to grow and learn from these things. You probably figure from me I want to walk away from learning from these events – these lads will learn for sure.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For a lot of guys who felt they missed opportunities, a loss and exit like that means we have got lots to work on. We will take the positives out of being knocked out of Europe and try and use that energy to make our game better so we can stay in the top four.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search