Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Crusaders' win a disaster for the prematurely picked All Blacks

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

And there I was thinking Super Rugby Pacific had finished weeks ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

I can see where I was led astray.

Yes, barely a day seemed to go by without someone telling us the Blues were unbeatable and their coach Leon MacDonald a near genius.

It brought to mind the old Eddie Jones line about fans with typewriters.

Never mind. Super Rugby was far from finished and the right team ended up winning.

But while the Crusaders’ 21-7 victory in Saturday’s final was a triumph for them, it looked a bit of a disaster for the All Blacks.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 19

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 19

A week’s always been a long time in politics, but it’s a long time in footy too. And on the strength of Saturday’s decider at Eden Park, it’s a shame the All Blacks were picked so prematurely.

The Crusaders, as they have so often in their storied history, produced a test match-quality performance and, on the strength of that, more than a few Blues appear well short of test status.

I’ll cut almost all of them a break.

I don’t regard Rieko Ioane as a test centre, nor his brother Akira a test blindside flanker. I’d have Rieko on the wing and Akira nowhere near the squad at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

Roger Tuivasa-Sheck is so far below David Havili’s class as a second five-eighth it’s not funny, but then we knew that already. Tuivasa-Sheck is good on his feet, but there’s no other strings to the bow.

Dalton Papalii was coming back from appendicitis, so he has an excuse for Saturday. Sadly, Ofa Tuungafasi and France-bound Karl Tu’inukuafe can’t say the same.

I’m on the record as not rating Stephen Perofeta and am pretty lukewarm about Hoskins Sotutu as well.

But these guys didn’t pick themselves in the All Blacks. They merely confirmed how big the gulf is between franchise and test football.

ADVERTISEMENT

I was actually most disappointed by Beauden Barrett.

Now the Blues’ lineout was bad on Saturday. The scrum too, at least in the final 20 minutes.

But Barrett’s seen that movie before.

He’s been in innumerable finals games for the Hurricanes in which the Crusaders decimated their set piece, to levels even worse than what the Blues endured at Eden Park.

And what’s he learnt from it? Not a lot, judging by Saturday’s evidence.

I try not to be a fan of players, but I am prepared to say that I think Barrett is a good footballer and that I wish him well.

Related

I’ve also argued on this website that he should have a mortgage on New Zealand’s No.10 jersey and be given full licence to try and lead the team to victory at the next World Cup.

I thought he was tactically inept in the final. Shuffled the ball too sideways, kicked too shallow and never allowed the Blues to gain decent field position or exert any pressure.

It was like he’d never played behind a slightly beaten pack before or encountered any defensive line speed.

All of which is a worry for the All Blacks, who’ve picked all sorts of athletes and occasionally explosive performers in their 36-man squad to meet Ireland, but perhaps too few grafters of the Tom Christie and Cullen Grace variety.

I’m not sure Christie will ever be an All Black and am well aware others regard Grace as lucky to have been one a couple of seasons ago. But if the All Blacks were named this Monday, instead of last, the national selectors would have a hard time justifying their exclusion.

New Zealand possesses any number of players who are outstanding on their best day. Who are dominant against bad teams and when they’re on the front foot and the pitch is dry and there’s not a lot of pressure or intensity.

But test rugby’s not like that. It’s not touch footy, there’s not acres of space and plenty of time.

Related

It’s hard and it’s frustrating and chances can often be few. It’s about accuracy and attitude, rather than athleticism.

The Crusaders’ win won’t be lost on Ireland, nor any of our international foes. That was the established blueprint for beating the All Blacks right there.

The crazy thing now is we’re going to take half that Blues side, whack them in the All Blacks and expect a different outcome.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
L
Lele 005 915 days ago

Hope you have a 2nd job because your attempt at writing click bait material is crap. This shows your true colours, nothing to do with Rugby.
You're just a glorified fan who has a platform to write your crap.

B
Bryan 915 days ago

Being Scottish I wish we had the 'SLUMP' that the AB's are in and surely with the world cup imminent this is the time to find out who are not good enough, as well as the finding the blend that is. The 2 things for me that are vital is winning set piece ball at scrums and lineout and once that is fixed pick the backline that will use it well and my goodness what choices you have, Ireland will be a great test to start the process.

n
neil 915 days ago

If only Scott Barrett and Sam Whitelock could play like that for the abs.

If they did we would be RWC champions still.

The fact they did not is the reason we are not.

NZ rugby is in a slump. It won’t always be that way for ever

b
bobsyouruncle 916 days ago

Seriously Tom Christie? So we should drop one of Cane, Papalii, or Savea? Interesting. If your talking about strings to bows he can only tackle really. Honestly your articles would be a lot better if you actually articulated your reasons for not rating players, instead of just stating so. Just because the Blues got destroyed it doesn't mean they all played horribly. Hoskins Sotutu was a standout in the final, making 25 tackles and some crucial try-saving turnovers. You've never actually stated why you don't like Perofeta, who actually was really solid last night, with a few good runs. Hard to do much when your lineout capitulates, meaning 0 territory and not much possession.

Agree on the Blues front row, and Havili is definitely above RTS for now, nobody should be arguing that now I don't think. Not Barrett's best game and his kicking from hand is definitely a problem. Christie was shocking in the first half, none of his clearances got them out of danger. Definitely would take Weber over him any day. Grace showed he should definitely be in the squad. If you haven't forgotten Rieko was our best 13 in the All Blacks last year, in particularly carving up against France in a way only he could. And then he's gotten even better this year, and has been by far the best 13 in the comp, and probably amongst the top 3-4 players. But you have your preconceived notions that apply to the Rieko of 2 years ago, so I guess he's not good enough lol.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search