Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The curious case of Darren Cave's premature retirement at the age of only 32

No13 Darren Cave was Ulster's well respected midfielder for more than a decade (Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

Time flies over us, but leaves its shadow behind

There is no doubt whatsoever that Darren Cave has made a huge contribution to Ulster Rugby over the last decade plus. He may not have been the absolute best player without debate to have worn the 13 jersey – given the likes of Jared Payne have featured during the same period – but he has without question made the greatest contribution.

ADVERTISEMENT

So how is it then that Cave comes to announce his retirement at the tender age of 32 and a few days? He has not experienced a career-ending injury, nor has he in any sense dropped off a cliff in terms of form. Only two weekends ago he made his mark in a European Champions Cup quarter-final, with Ulster narrowly losing out to holders and favourites Leinster.

The answer is simple – it’s a peculiar Belfast and Irish rugby thing. If Cave was playing in England he would have the ability to keep playing professionally for a few more years, to move sideways or step down a level. The same is true if he was playing in France. I’m sure he has had offers in those quarters. Similarly had he been an Ulster import, he would have been happy to head closer to home and stay on the field.

But he’s a Belfast – or more accurately Holywood – boy and the prospect of commuting to keep playing or up-routing his family for what may only be one or two seasons understandably maybe didn’t appeal.

In seasons past, Connacht provided the step down or sideways move for many Ulster and Ireland players, but they have raised their game and those opportunities have long gone. Even at Ulster in seasons past, a way would have been found to keep a club legend like Cave involved, but there is no longer budget for sentimentalism.

He is viewed as blocking the progress of up and coming talent, the likes of James Hume and Hayden Hyde, the end-of-season arrival from Harlequins. With Will Addison and Luke Marshall already on the books and Stuart McCloskey seemingly able to play every minute of every match, it was always likely there would be no further swansong for Cave.

Yet, Cave leaves Ravenhill having given the fans some tremendous memories, many of the best on big European occasions. And of course this season isn’t over yet.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ulster proved against Leinster that at close to full strength they can go toe to toe with the best club sides around. Ulster fans revelled in the courage and commitment of their team. They lost but the fans felt like winners. Likewise, the criticism of Jacob Stockdale came from outside, not inside the player pool or fan base

The mental exhaustion that was Dublin last Saturday week was always going to inhibit their ability to do an away PRO14 job at Glasgow. Other results didn’t go Ulster’s way either, but things remain firmly in their own hands.

If they box off their fatigue, a win away at Edinburgh will almost certainly put them back in the end of season play-offs where anything could happen. It would be a fitting send off for Cave, and one or two others if Ulster could once again finish the season in the PRO14 knockout mix.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 20 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search