Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Curry at No8 debate rages on

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Eddie Jones is putting his neck on the line with his No8 policy in this Six Nations and is not going to back down after saying he wants to turn Tom Curry into a specialist in that position. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The 21-year-old started at the back of the scrum at the Stade de France on Sunday for the first time in an England shirt, having barely played in that position for his club Sale Sharks. 

The decision to play the 20-cap forward at No8 in the absence of Billy Vunipola was questioned before the game – and many doubters felt vindicated after the loss. 

Jones has now opted to retain the same 35-man squad for the Calcutta Cup match at Murrayfield this weekend, which has surprised even more people as there is still no specialist No8 in the squad.  

Former England loose forwards have weighed in on this debate with differing opinions. James Haskell told RugbyPass that supports Jones’ idea.

(Continue reading below…)

Michael Fatialofa fund-raising campaign launched following his move to a specialist spinal injury clinic

Video Spacer

However, World Cup winners Lawrence Dallaglio and Neil Back have highlighted some concerns, not only as it needs the backing of Sale, who would need to play Curry regularly at eight, but the Six Nations is not the place to try such an experiment out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Curry did not actually have a bad game in Paris and he certainly improved as the match progressed, although his control at the base of the scrum may have been shaky.

However, whenever a player is played out of position, they are often the first one to be blamed alongside the coach.

Curry was perhaps a victim in this match of England lacking any penetrating ball carriers, particularly once Manu Tuilagi went off. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The No8 is usually the man to do this, but Jones wants to persist with this idea, using Rodney So’oialo as the prototype that Curry can copy. 

The ex-All Black started as a seven but was moulded into a world-class No8. However, he was a ferocious ball-carrier and better suited to No8 than Curry, whose strengths lie elsewhere. 

There is nothing to say that all No8s need to be the size of Vunipola or Duane Vermeulen, as Australia even reached a World Cup final with David Pocock at No8. This shows that such a move can be executed with success, although they were slightly different circumstances. 

But England seem to have a wealth of No8s at the moment who are equally in-form. Alex Dombrandt’s name was bandied about the past week as was Sam Simmonds in light of their respective recent performances for Harlequins and Exeter Chiefs.

https://twitter.com/gibgibgib1/status/1224598094731411456?s=20

 

Nathan Hughes and Teimana Harrison have also been in the conversation, although both have fallen out of favour with Jones in recent seasons. 

Even in England’s current squad currently, Ben Earl has more experience of playing in that position having been used there a lot for Saracens. 

Moreover, what seems most peculiar is that it was only three months ago that Curry was nominated for World Rugby player of the year as a flanker. 

Many see him as a natural openside, although he has also been played at six, and he is already one of the best players in the world. 

Sandwiching him into a position where there are many more natural alternatives is what the English public find so preposterous, regardless of how well he may adapt to the role. 

Curry is a dynamic carrier in open space with great hands for a loose forward, but as shown on Sunday he is not necessarily built for gaining the hard yards in the middle of the field like Vunipola is. 

Although this is Jones’ criticism of Simmonds as well, nobody would want to see either player compromise their mobility or speed by bulking up to play like a stereotypical No8. 

Not only that, it will create a confusing dilemma as to where Curry plays when Vunipola does return. 

The idea of having a mobile back row is something that appealed to Jones at the RWC where Curry was part of the ‘Kamikazee Kids’ alongside Sam Underhill. Those two on the flank allowed England to play at a frenetic intensity, but they were also supplemented by such a physical presence as Vunipola. 

Moving Curry to the back of the scrum opens up the possibility of playing an even more mobile back row, but that is counteracted by playing a lock as a blindside flanker, Courtney Lawes. 

This is very similar to Australia’s back row in 2015 where Scott Fardy wore the six shirt and Michael Hooper seven, but England clearly lacked the ball carriers against France that the Wallabies had. 

This is not the first machination of Jones’ that has been rebuked and it means he needs results to back such ideas up. 

Although it is still not wholly popular, the decision to move Owen Farrell to inside centre is one of his plans that has brought England success. 

Be that as it may, this is perhaps his most radical move of his tenure, and therefore faces the most scrutiny.  

WATCH: The Rugby Pod reflects on England’s loss in Paris and looks ahead to the Calcutta Cup clash with Scotland 

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Borthwick, it's time to own up – Andy Goode Borthwick, it's time to own up – Andy Goode
Search