Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The damning trend that could foreshadow a huge loss for the Wallabies in the final Bledisloe Cup test

Rob Simmons. (Original photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

As New Zealand fans were reminded during last year’s Rugby World Cup in Japan, the All Blacks sometimes lose.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the most consistent team in the world is not going to get it right every week and all it takes is an off night from the men in black – or a comparatively excellent performance from their opposition – for Kiwis to have to sit back and reflect on the fact that the All Blacks are not unstoppable.

Rarely, however, do the All Blacks lose two matches in a row. In fact, it’s only happened once in the last decade.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown panel discuss the Healthspan Elite Fan’s Voice poll where RugbyPass followers were asked whether the All Blacks 10-15 dual pivot system is the best way to power their attack.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown panel discuss the Healthspan Elite Fan’s Voice poll where RugbyPass followers were asked whether the All Blacks 10-15 dual pivot system is the best way to power their attack.

In 2011, with the World Cup on the horizon, head coach Graham Henry made the decision to send an understrength All Blacks side to South Africa for NZ’s third game of the Tri-Nations. The likes of Owen Franks, Brad Thorn, Richie McCaw, Kieran Read, Dan Carter, Ma’a Nonu, Conrad Smith, Cory Jane and Mils Muliaina – many of who started in the World Cup final months later – were all left at home for the All Blacks’ 18-5 loss. The following week, Australia also managed to upset New Zealand in Brisbane.

Since 2011, however, the All Blacks have never lost two matches on the trot – which is why the Wallabies’ hopes of snaring the Bledisloe Cup back after their loss in Auckland were slim to none.

It’s also why Dave Rennie’s introduction to test rugby was never going to go well, despite the coach’s immense promise.

With one more Bledisloe Cup match still to play before the Wallabies have the opportunity to tackle the relatively tame Pumas, things are only about to get tougher for the man that coached the Chiefs to back-to-back Super Rugby titles in 2012 and 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s simply no bigger challenge in international rugby than kicking off your career with four games against the All Blacks and it’s a series of games that could have long term repercussions on Rennie and his young charges.

The Australian sides that have challenged New Zealand for the Bledisloe Cup over the last twenty years have all been talented, but with each defeat the players have become weighed down by history.

Man for man, the All Blacks have typically had stronger teams than their trans-Tasman rivals – but the gap has not been so big to justify the two decades of dominance by the Kiwis.

Instead, the repeated losses have built up an impossible mountain for Australia to climb. That mountain was significantly smaller at the beginning of this test season, when Rennie announced a squad populated by a slew of uncapped youngsters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many of Rennie’s 2020 debutants actually had winning records against national NZ sides until the Bledisloe Cup series kicked off – but those records have now been smashed to pieces, with a 0-3 ledger kicking off their international careers.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass) on

New men such as Harry Wilson, Noah Lolesio and Filipo Daugunu could be long-term Wallabies – but few players take straight to test rugby and these young Super Rugby AU stars need time to bed themselves in. It’s hard to do that when you’re on the end of a few floggings – and things could get even worse this weekend.

The All Blacks haven’t played a four-match series since the game went professional and until recently, three-match series was also incredibly rare. In the last decade, however, New Zealand have hosted three-match series on six occasions, and there’s a clear trend in how the All Blacks have performed as the back-to-back-to-back games have progressed.

New Zealand tend to put in a respectable if not rusty performance in the first game, winning by an average of 17 points. Despite the players’ limited time together at that stage of the season, they are still relatively fresh compared to the Northern Hemisphere tourists, who are at the end of a long season.

After a few tweaks to combinations and tactics, the second match is often the closest of the series. Three times, against Ireland in 2012, England in 2014 and the British and Irish Lions in 2017, the visitors have kept the result with three points (or, in the Lions’ case, actually scored a win).

It’s in the third game, however, when the All Blacks tend to cut loose. They’ve spent plenty of time together in camp, they’ve worked out the flaws in their opposition’s game plan, and they’ve got their own tactics ticking along nicely.

In 2012, they beat the Irish 60-0 – despite the 3-point margin a week earlier. In 2016, they smashed Wales 40-0. Two years ago, they crushed France 49-14. The average scoreline in the third game of a three-match series with NZ is 41-11 in the All Blacks’ favour.

That’s exactly why the All Blacks’ 43-5 drubbing on Saturday night shouldn’t have come as a big surprise – and why next week’s game could be even more diabolical for the Wallabies. If the margin spike in the third game of a series reflects the All Blacks’ improvement over a string of games against the same opposition, then the Wallabies could find themselves on the wrong end of an absolute drubbing in Brisbane next weekend.

Had the Rugby Championship gone ahead as planned, before the Springboks pulled out of the competition, the Wallabies would have a brief respite ahead of them while the All Blacks would need to shift their focus to a new team. Instead, however, Australia find themselves poised for a fourth barrage – and things could be about to get ugly for the young, inexperienced team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 35 | Six Nations Round 2 Review

O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

Second round of the Men's Six Nations | Whistle Watch

Harlequins vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Saitama Wildknights | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

The Dupont Ploy: How France went from underdogs to Olympic gods | The Report

Former rugby player is truly an NFL superstar | Walk the Talk | Jordan Mailata

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 27 minutes ago
Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii can be Australia's new cross-code hero

I did not see that one as I watched the game, OM. That should have been picked up and penalised. Bell had no right to barge Robertson.


I saw a couple of other things that I would raise here, see what others think.


First the awarding of the penalty after the tackle in the 39th minute. Looking at the action closely, Waratah 12 is brought down by Highlanders 11. Highlanders 11 is back on his feet inst very fast, and has released totally apart from his righthand holding the jersey of 12. !! jackals well, and the ball spills out of the contact zone.


The way that sequence is now seen in so many caes by referees is a sufficient release, and the player over the ball having the right to jackal. I would also be looking at the support the Waratahs 12 had. One player with him only, who did go in to clean, really overran the breakdown. There were no other Waratahs within 10 -15 m as the jackal took place. Waratahs 12 was isolated, and there were four Highlanders in attendance. In my view, that was a wrong decision 9/10 times.


Oh, and going right back, I felt it was clear the ball was passed forward out of the hands by Sua’ali’i in the lead up. Look at the nearest support player, who strthes out and misses the pass which goes to ground and is then picked up by 12. Highlanders were unlucky to concede the three points in a game that was won by one point at the death.


The second one is the chip by Sua’ali’i earlier in that first half, 31 st min. The Highlander 6 jumps vertically to block, misses, and while still in the air, Sua’ali’i collides with him. Surely that is a penalty against the player on the ground. The Highlander 6 also makes no move to block JS, no out stretched arm, or shoulder swing.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
'He wants players to be able to play four positions': Former All Black critiques Robertson's strategy

Sorta “rent a comment” kinda guy really.

Haha yep another great way to say it.


Look I actually agree with the guy, he might have heard something said and seeing as he loves to make a spotlight, and be in it, he decided/mistakenly came up with this headline grabber?


Despite what I already said was the actual idea for the topic he mistook, I think, at this particular moment, there are plenty of situations people should be sticking. I’m OK with the Dmac situation if its just until Stevenson and Etene start sharing the Fullback job. I’m OK with Barrett being left at 15 and Perofeta being given the job to displace Plummer (easy task for him imo) as the first five (with the ABs in mind). But pretty much all the others, like your suggestions, they are far off optimal understanding of their core positions so should be trying to specialize for a couple of years. Think Ioane and Proctor, one or the other, not trying to get both on. Barrett or ALB/Higgins/Lam, Sititi and Sotutu at 8, Finau/Haig/all the 6’s injured or gone etc.


From Razors perspective, of a coach on the limit of what can be achieved, he wants to a balance of core and niche. Having players able to cover situations when your down a man, through card or because he’s lying on the ground, you want your players to be adaptable. Does this mean he’d like them to learn that adaptable by playing other positions fully, like for a whole game in another position, or just as in terms of their skills sets. Because if you apply what I suggested Razor was referring to as “four” positions, wingers can be very useful in other roles like a carrying 12, or a pilferring 7, let alone benefit from a tight relationship and understand of what a 13 is trying to do for them.


This concept applies to pretty much every single position. Take your(my) Lock example, theyre now lifters, they can (size and shape allowing) ruck and maul like the front row, run like a back and offload like a basketballer. Many recent young locks of of this rangy razzle dazle variety.


Personally I really like and think that adding versatility is inevitable with the amount of training and really early highperformance skill/athleticism work they get through. Max Hicks looked interesting as a 2m beanpole playing openside in France, PSDT showing the frame is certainly viable (as apposed to the typical 6 playing lock), opensides really need a running/carry side to their play these days and could easily play in midfield. Halfbacks are starting to play standing up straight rather than low to the ground, how cool would it have been if the Hurricanes had decided to retain Preston by switching Roigard to 10 for this season? Like Leroy Carter they’re already good wingers with the right pace. I do really see the back three players staying were they are for the most part though, unless theyre special players like Dmac.

34 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How will Matt Sherratt rebuild crumbling Wales? How will Matt Sherratt rebuild crumbling Wales?
Search