Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The dangerous clearout method Pocock and other poachers need to be protected from

David Pocock of Australia runs onto the field (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

David Pocock needs to be protected from illegal neck rolls that have already forced him to miss key games for the Wallabies and is turning parents off the sport, according to his Brumbies coach Dan McKellar.

ADVERTISEMENT

McKellar is calling on Super Rugby’s referees to come down hard on illegal neck twisting which left the flanker in serious pain for much of last season. It forced Pocock to miss Australia’s Rugby Championship clash against South Africa in Brisbane and the Test against England at Twickenham.

Ahead of the new Super Rugby season, McKellar highlighted his major concerns over one of Australia’s most important players and said: “I’m all for the game being tough and physical and played on the edge, but any action that’s not within the laws of the game needs to be acted on.

“It’s a tricky one for Pocock, because he’s so dominant as a poacher and he’s on every team’s tip-sheet each week. Him being cleaned out legally, compared to having his neck twisted is important.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

“It’s about player safety, it’s not about just David, either. The same applies to Michael Hooper at the Waratahs or Liam Wright at the Reds.”

While McKellar’s focus is on the Brumbies, he has serious concerns over the image of the sport when players such as Pocock are forced to take a break with serious injury. He is convinced rugby union will lose out when parents come to support their children’s sporting lives due to the threat of injury in the contact situation.

He explained to AAP: “You don’t want to see that action, because mums and dads are watching our game and we want their kids to aspire to play rugby, and those actions scare the mums off.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m not saying these things are deliberate, more often that not they’re accidents but they need to be acted on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search