Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The difference between the Hurricanes and the Crusaders

Ardie Savea. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

It is clear the Hurricanes are frustrated after losing to the Crusaders 24-21, but the target of their frustrations, the referees, is typical of losing teams.

ADVERTISEMENT

Professional rugby is a high stakes game where emotions run high, and when things don’t go your way, it is easy to look at everything that went against you in search of answers.

No one doubts that it must be frustrating to lose on a dodgy call after running an all-or-nothing gamble to try a lineout maul to win the game.

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 28

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 28

When you end up with nothing, the reaction is predictable. For captain Ardie Savea, who often puts everything into a game, it is a particularly hard pill to swallow.

To demand better of the officials is another thing entirely. Would it actually help the Hurricanes win more games if the referee was five to ten percent more accurate?

Because the question is, who is responsible for losing games of rugby at the end of day, the teams themselves or the referees? What do you believe?

If Savea demanded more of his teammates, coaches or the organisation instead, would that result in material improvements over time? The easy option is to point externally, the harder ask is to hold your peers accountable.

ADVERTISEMENT

How many of them are just ‘paid to play rugby’ and how many of them are truly ‘professional rugby players’? The latter has nothing to do with getting compensated and everything to do with how you act and carry out your time in the quest to be the best.

We don’t know these answers, of course. Only the players and coaches inside the building do, but the best team in the Super Rugby competition likely has a group of players who are doing all the right things and more.

When has a champion team ever been ill-disciplined, unfocused, done the minimum level required or blamed others for the results. Never.

The Hurricanes aren’t a hopeless case by any means. They are a very competitive team that finished one point astray from the Chiefs and three points behind the Crusaders. They are the only team to have defeated the Blues so far.

ADVERTISEMENT

They are there or thereabouts, but marginally off the pace.

The great Bill Walsh, former San Fransisco 49ers coach in the NFL,  believed the score took care of itself. If the right systems are in place, the game was already decided before the game.

For the Crusaders, it is clear they have had an advantage over their rivals over the last half decade with better systems up and down the organisation .

This starts from the development and recruitment of players right down to the weekly preparation for a game. The result is baked in already. They just go out and do the job. They aren’t surprised when they win, the score takes care of itself.

There can be times when the Crusaders do not get it right, but, by and large, they just win even when not playing their best game. They have a feedback loop that consistently shows them ‘if we do x, y, and z properly, this is what happens’.

This is with both short-term and long-term processes with the team and within the organisation. The Hurricanes have the same feedback loop at the moment, but with inverse outcomes.

Instead of looking inward to find out what is going wrong with x, y and z, their public leaders are starting to share their frustration outward, which is indicative of a team coming under pressure, desperate for results and looking to find blame.

It is clear that the Hurricanes as a wider organisation, do not have the best systems in place. All five New Zealand teams have good systems, but the question is, do they have the best? The answer would have to be no, based on first-hand evidence.

The long-term systems that they need to rely on – such as recruitment and development, the funnel of players that you develop into Super Rugby players – has not kept them as New Zealand’s best side after their 2016 championship. They have slipped to fourth based on this season’s results.

Many highly-rated prospects, often regarded as the top of their age-grade, have ended up with other teams. Others that have stayed haven’t really reached their potential.

Their second row has always been considered below-par when compared with, say, the Crusaders, who always seem to have All Black locks and front rows.

Taine Plumtree is now with the Blues and Naitoa Ah Kuoi is at the Chiefs, both of whom were schooled at Wellington College and locked down together in the second row of that school’s 1st XV five years ago.

Both were New Zealand Schools prospects. They both came through Hurricanes’ age-grade teams. Both are with other Super Rugby teams. If they were to become All Blacks in time, it would be prove to be a bad decision to let them leave.

For Plumtree, you couldn’t be more aligned with the club. His father was an assistant coach for years and was briefly the head coach. To lose a blue chip prospect tied so close to the franchise says something.

How about Folau Fakatava? Everyone knew Fakatava was the best schoolboy halfback in the country at Hastings Boys’, possibly the most exciting prospect in years.

Everyone knew TJ Perenara would eventually need to be replaced. Nevertheless, the Highlanders snapped Fakatava up to be the heir behind Aaron Smith. The Hurricanes’ halfback stocks have been short-term stop gaps since 2016 with no real long term planning for life post-Perenara.

Fakatava’s high school team had six New Zealand Schools representatives in 2017, and he would have been the seventh if he wasn’t injured.

This is a team, the Hastings Boys’ High School 1st XV, right in the Hurricanes’ backyard, in the Hawke’s Bay. Just one of those seven, loose forward Devan Flanders, is with the Hurricanes.

Four of them are with other Super Rugby Pacific teams: Lincoln McClutchie and Danny Toala are with Moana Pasifika, Kini Naholo is at the Crusaders, and, of course, Fakatava has signed with the Highlanders.

If these recruitment and development systems were theoretically 10 percent better, the Hurricanes might have had the extra points they needed against the Chiefs or Crusaders.

If the Hurricanes had scouted and kept Scott Barrett in the region, when Taranaki was still part of the franchise’s catchment area, he wouldn’t have sacked their lineout on Saturday afternoon.

The point is, the focus should be on continual improvement of all the systems that go into team building. Forget about the referees. The score will take care of itself if everything else is in place.

One team that has visibly changed its approach over the last few years is the Blues, who are having their best season after a breakthrough Super Rugby Trans-Tasman title last year.

The Blues region always has a surplus of talent having the biggest city and have never had a “need” to look around the country.

Retaining is always a challenge, but the Blues were never really that interested in looking beyond their borders. That has changed now, with the club scouring prospects nationally and taking them out of other regions.

If you want to be the best it is logical to seek out the best players available, regardless of where they are.

The signing of Roger Tuivasa-Sheck is the headline grabber, but the recruitment of players like Plumtree, Anton Segner, Sam Darry and Jacob Ratumaitavuki-Kneepkens are just as critical.

Those latter four names are all recent New Zealand age-grade representatives from other regions who have bolstered the Blues’ depth in positional groups that are already well-stocked.

The Blues already have Dalton Papalii, Hoskins Sotutu and Akira Ioane, three capped All Blacks in the back row. Adding Segner, a former Crusaders U20 captain, and Plumtree, a hybrid option at lock or 6 into mix has built incredible depth and competition.

From the signings at the top end of the market in Beauden Barrett and Tuivasa-Sheck, to the other end in highly-rated, unproven prospects, the Blues have got it right at all levels to build a championship-calibre roster.

You hear about how the arrival of Tuivasa-Sheck and the professionalism he brings that has inspired the Blues’ younger players.

The arrival of Barrett a couple of seasons ago also had a similar impact. Those are gains that are compounding and taking the Blues in the right direction.

They are finally using their market power, with business connections and third-party sponsors, to lure talent. It was an advantage they have always had, but under-utilised. It is perhaps an edge in their new system.

If you have the best systems in place, across the board in all different areas, the results will come. The Blues are finding that those results are coming, but time will time if they can achieve sustained success like the Crusaders.

For the Hurricanes, better processes and systems across the board in due time will see them get the results they currently think they deserve. Every player getting 10 percent better will outweigh the impact of the referee being 10 percent more accurate.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Five legends to be inducted into World Rugby Hall of Fame Five legends to be inducted into World Rugby Hall of Fame
Search