Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'encouraging thing' fuelling Saracens for their away semi-final

Saracens celebrating at Bristol earlier this month (Photo by Ryan Hiscott/Getty Images)

Mark McCall believes that some really good performances on the road in this season’s Gallagher Premiership have Saracens primed to challenge Northampton in this Friday’s semi-final. The London club lost at Franklin’s Gardens nine weeks ago when they last visited, coming second best on a scoreline of 30-41.

ADVERTISEMENT

They have since stumbled into the play-offs, losing their grip on a home semi-final when beaten 10-20 by Sale at StoneX Stadium on the final day of the regular season.

That defeat saw them drop from second to fourth place on the table, forcing them to play away this weekend rather than host a knockout match in London.

Video Spacer

Do England rugby have to pick Jack Willis after staggering performance against Leinster

Jim Hamilton and Bernard Jackman react to Jack Willis’ incredible performance in the 2024 Investec European Champions Cup Final at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

Video Spacer

Do England rugby have to pick Jack Willis after staggering performance against Leinster

Jim Hamilton and Bernard Jackman react to Jack Willis’ incredible performance in the 2024 Investec European Champions Cup Final at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

However, despite not having home comfort in their quest to reach a third Premiership final in succession, McCall suggested that his defending champions have shown enough glimpses of form on their travels this season to suggest their trip to the table-toppers is a winnable game.

Saracens won five of their nine regular season matches away from home, including run-in victories at Bath and Bristol, which is fuelling their belief that they can now knock out Northampton.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Northampton
22 - 20
Full-time
Saracens
All Stats and Data

“The curious thing about this year for us has been the gap between us at our best and us at our worst,” he said. “I can’t say how that is. We have talked about this over the last 10 days, that we are a team that can perform at a very high level. We have shown that five or six times this year.

“Funnily enough most of those have been away from home. Kingsholm without our World Cup players. Ashton Gate. The Rec. So we have had some really good performances on the road. That is the encouraging thing about those performances. It shows us what we are capable of.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So we talked a little bit about the factors that allowed that to happen against what we showed as a team against Sale… It has been nice to have a two-week lead-in into the game, especially after the way we played against Sale probably need it. It’s gone well.

“Although this is our 13th Premiership semi-final since 2010, which is a record we can be proud of, it feels like the first one. There is that kind of excitement around the place, that kind of anticipation and that’s really good.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search