Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'The English, how do I say... the absolute ignorance' - Irish TV tear in England

England's Marcus Smith and Owen Farrell after the Guinness Six Nations match at Twickenham Stadium, London. Picture date: Saturday March 11, 2023. (Photo by Ben Whitley/PA Images via Getty Images)

An Irish television panel have torn into to an apparent expectation in English rugby that the selection of Marcus Smith would prove a panacea for an ailing England side, insisting the issues are more deep-rooted.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a devastating blow to their Six Nations title hopes and a rude awakening for head coach Steve Borthwick’s new regime, England suffered a record-breaking home defeat at the hands of France, losing 53-10 at Twickenham.

At halftime, England found themselves trailing by a staggering 27-3, marking their largest halftime deficit in any fixture at Twickenham. The team was completely overwhelmed and now appear to be again in the midst of a full-blown crisis, as France systematically dismantled them up front.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

On Irish television, a Virgin Media panel made up of Andrew Trimble, Rob Kearney and Matt Williams tore into the unfounded expectations placed on the shoulders of Marcus Smith, who was selected to start ahead of Owen Farrell for the game.

Williams weighed in: “It’s a beautiful story – “Bring back Eddie Jones!” – that’s what I can hear the English press saying – “We were wrong!”

“The English, how do I say… the absolute ignorance that I’ve been reading during the week about the selection of Marcus Smith. I’m not criticising the young man in any way – but it was delusional, it was delusional to think that the problems of that team were around Marcus. Marcus is a fine player, who tried very hard today.

“We can all see there are huge systemic problems with this team. Eddie Jones was very hard done by, in my opinion.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Borthwick is finding out that this is not Leicester, this is not the Premiership, this is much bigger than that. They were shockingly poor in every aspect. The pace they played the game was at a snail’s pace.”

Trimble doubled-down on Williams point about Smith, saying the young player wasn’t to blame for England’s staggering collapse.

“Matt’s right – Marcus Smith is certainly not the bad guy here, but that whole debate is irrelevant,” said Trimble. “Across the board, France were better. Not just 1 through 15 – 1 through 23.”

The camera panned to Owen Farrell, who was giving a post-match speech to the players.

ADVERTISEMENT

“[Owen Farrell] is searching hard. He’s really searching for something to say. That’s such a tough place to be – that’s not his first team talk today feeling depressed. At half-time the game was gone.

“It’s pretty depressing that you find yourself repeating the same thing three, four, five times and everybody’s looking elsewhere.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
i
isaac 650 days ago

Eddie must be smiling

l
lot 651 days ago

can't bring back EJ... prepare to be ousted in pool games this world cup, just like your other english coach lancaster

G
GrahamVF 651 days ago

England got 30 plus points hiding by SA in opening game of last WC in France yet they made it to the final. But I think the jobs for pals coaching setup really can’t offer much more here. If you can change coaching personnel half way through the WC and get a silver medal there is no reason not to admit a mistake in appointing Borthwick. Where on earth did the defence coach get his credentials from?

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search