Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The evolution of the kicking tee

A rugby match ball is placed on a kicking tee (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Rugby is known to be a thunderous sport involving some of the biggest, fastest, and hardest athletes around. However, one aspect of the game that requires no particular body type is that of the kicker.

ADVERTISEMENT

What must be said, is that the kicker does not need to run the 100m in less than 11 seconds, nor be able to bench press 150kg. What the kicker needs are ice-cold nerves and a near-perfect technique.

Now alongside these attributes, a kicker will need the correct equipment. The equipment in question will come in the form of a kicking tee. With many shapes and sizes to choose from, the modern kicker is never short of options to suit their style.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

This has not always been the case however, with the tee evolving over the years we look back at its origins and how it came about to be one of the most vital sets of apparatus in a kicker’s arsenal.

First up, let’s have a look at the times before the kicking tee became commonplace in the game.

Placed by a teammate

GALWAY, IRELAND: November 26: Kieran Marmion #9 of Connacht holds the ball in the wind for Jack Carty #10 of Connacht to kick a penalty during the Connacht V Ospreys, United Rugby Championship match at The Sportsground on November 26th, 2021 in Galway, Ireland. (Photo by Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images)

Back in the 19th century, when aiming for a place kick the play was deemed ‘live’ as soon as the ball was placed down on the ground ready for a kick. Because of this ruling a place kick always involved two players, one the placer, the other the kicker.

Due to the ball being deemed as live once on the ground, defending players were allowed to charge down the kicks in an attempt to put the kicker off.

ADVERTISEMENT

In an effort to increase the punishment of a penalty kick, the charging down of the kicker was banned in 1925 to allow the attacking side a better chance to score. The idea of this was to increase the punishment after conceding a penalty.

It wasn’t until 1958 that the need for two players to be involved in the kick was abolished. This came about a change in the conversion routine, players were now only allowed to start their charge once the player had started their run-up.

The use of sand

Japan’s Keiji Hirose (right) builds a mound from sand, to kick a conversion (Photo by Tom Honan/EMPICS via Getty Images)

Before the modern kicking tees we see today, players would regularly use sand or mud to levitate the ball above the ground ready to strike. This would allow players to get further underneath the ball to gain greater height and length on their kicks.

When lining up for a shot at the posts, players would have their buckets full of sand brought on for them. A spade away from a day out at the beach, the versatility of sand and mud would allow players to get the ball in the perfect position for a thump at goal.

The cone

Galway , Ireland – 26 February 2022; A general view of match balls before the United Rugby Championship match between Connacht and DHL Stormers at The Sportsground in Galway. (Photo By Diarmuid Greene/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

For the younger generation and the uninitiated, the standard training cone has become a staple go-to for anyone wanting to learn the trade or have a fun bit of practice.

Used primarily in sporting terms for training exercises in agility, handling and other parts of the game, the cone can be doubled up as a makeshift kicking tee. The downside to the cone is that it cannot easily be manipulated to allow for different ball positions. So if you like the ball to be tilted even slightly when kicking, you’re tough out of luck. The upside is they’re very easy to come across, stupidly cheap to buy, and you’ll always have too many of them.

The four-pronged tee

As rubber and plastic started to become more and more common in sporting equipment, the four-pronged kicking tee had its birth. Arguably the most recognisable tee on the market, plenty of very well-known rugby brands have put their name to this design.

Particularly with the rubber version, a player is able to position the ball in many different positions, suiting their personal style and helping determine the height and distance the player is looking to reach.

Ball placement

DUNEDIN, NEW ZEALAND – SEPTEMBER 18: Damian McKenzie of Waikato prepares to kick at goal during the round seven Bunnings NPC match between Otago and Waikato at Forsyth Barr Stadium, on September 18, 2022, in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

In terms of the placement of the ball, certain players like Leigh Halfpenny and Elliot Daly tend to position the end pointing forward towards the goal in an effort to get greater distance and improved accuracy.

Others such as Jonny Wilkinson tended to lean the ball slightly outwards to allow himself to hook the ball round as he went for the posts.

Modern designs

Limerick , Ireland – 28 May 2021; A general view of a rugby ball on a kicking tee in the warm-up before the Guinness PRO14 Rainbow Cup match between Munster and Cardiff Blues at Thomond Park in Limerick. (Photo By Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Building on a whole new generation of kickers comes a whole new generation of kicking options. There are an incredible amount of new designs and styles now out there to suit every player.

For those who prefer to be able to get a clean strike, there are much higher tees. Whereas for those who prefer to keep the ball slightly lower to get greater distance there are options that will suit them too.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search