Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The fall and rise of the Blues' All Blacks replacement

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

By all accounts, Kurt Eklund was somewhat of a revelation for the Blues in 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

When the Bay of Plenty hooker was signed for the year, he would have expected to spend much of the season playing second-fiddle to All Black James Parsons.

Injuries marred Parsons’ campaign, however, and by the end of Super Rugby Aotearoa, Eklund had notched 13 appearances, featuring in all but two of the Blues’ matches.

Video Spacer

Rugby Australia CEO Andy Marinos, NSW Waratahs captain Jake Gordon and Stan Sport commentator Allana Ferguson have spoken at the Super Rugby AU launch event held at Taronga Zoo in Sydney.

Video Spacer

Rugby Australia CEO Andy Marinos, NSW Waratahs captain Jake Gordon and Stan Sport commentator Allana Ferguson have spoken at the Super Rugby AU launch event held at Taronga Zoo in Sydney.

Following Parsons’ season-ending concussion in the latter stages of the season, Eklund took over as the Blues’ first-choice hooker and started in their three final matches – it was the perfect end to the campaign for the 29-year-old.

Given the above, you could have been forgiven for scratching your head when the Blues announced their squad for 2021 and Eklund was absent.

Instead, Parsons, Ray Niuia and Soane Vikena were listed as the team’s hookers for the coming year.

Fortunately for Eklund, the uncertainty surrounding Parsons’ involvement meant that he was kept on as an injury replacement – but it still seemed like a tough call given Eklund’s performances throughout the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The truth of the matter was that because Parsons and Niuia had a year to go on their contracts, and Blues Development Player of the Year Vikena had been locked in on a long-term deal, there simply wasn’t the space to accommodate Eklund.

It was hardly just rewards and in a fair world, Eklund would have been a permanent fixture for 2021. To their credit, the Blues locked Eklund in for 2022 and 2023 – at least securing the hooker’s long-term future.

In a new twist, Parsons’ recent decision to retire from the game has seen Eklund brought back into the squad on a fulltime contract – and it would come as no surprise if the Bay of Plenty rake is called upon to start in the Blues’ opening fixture of the year against the Hurricanes.

While Eklund had an offer on the table from the Melbourne Rebels in Australia, his decision to remain in New Zealand has been justly rewarded and should see the 29-year-old once again accrue plenty of minutes in Super Rugby Aotearoa.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It has all worked out well for me,” Eklund said of the new developments. “Obviously it’s sad for James to be forced to retire. I learned so much from him last year.

“I have my chance now and I will take it with both hands. I owe it to James to be the best I can be – because he has left some big shoes to fill both on and off the field.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search