Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'first-rate' Joe Heyes response to losing England squad place

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Richard Wigglesworth has given his take on how England squad regular Joe Heyes has reacted to his recent exclusion by Steve Borthwick. Originally capped twice in the 2021 Summer Series versus USA and Canada, the soon-to-be 24-year-old tighthead went on to earn five more caps under Eddie Jones, coming off the bench in all three tour matches in Australia last July and then featuring as the No18 in the November games against Argentina and Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

Heyes was then named in the 36-man training squad for the Six Nations and Borthwick also included him in the start-of-match-week squads versus Scotland and Italy. However, with Will Stuart now fit, Heyes has now lost out in a tighthead squad selection where Leicester club colleague Dan Cole has come off the bench in all three recent England games for the starting Kyle Sinckler.

Cole hadn’t been capped since the 2019 Rugby World Cup final but the silver lining for Heyes with his teammate now back on the Test scene has been his selection to start in the recent Gallagher Premiership wins for Leicester over Saracens and London Irish.

Video Spacer

Mike Brown and Ollie Lawrence | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 66

Video Spacer

Mike Brown and Ollie Lawrence | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 66

Those outings at No3 were the first for Heyes in the league since the start of October, as he has been playing second fiddle to Cole at club level even though he was the player getting regularly called up for England duty by Eddie Jones. However, with the Australian now replaced by Borthwick, Cole has returned from the Test wilderness and Heyes has felt the squeeze, making do instead with club action. His latest outing will now be at home on Saturday versus Bath.

“He has been good, really good,” said interim head coach Wigglesworth when asked how felt Heyes reacted to his recent England exclusion. “He has improved in the last few weeks in terms of his consistency in games and has looked like a really top international tighthead, how long he has played, how well he is lasting, so I have been really impressed with him.

Related

“I can’t speak for him, how he is enjoying being here and not having to come back (from England) in between. I know (what it is like), I had to do that. That is not an easy position to be in but it’s one you have to do if you want to play international rugby at different times. But for Leicester Tigers, he has been first-rate.

“We have got plenty of guys that do it [go in and out with England for training]. The coaching and the calls, everything is different so the rugby is different but let’s be honest, everyone wants to play international rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You have to get over the disappointment, your personal disappointment that you are not playing, and then use it and that is what we want him to do, we want him to use it to play really well for Leicester. All our guys are motivated to play for Leicester but there should be that added little extra of like, ‘Right, I’m going to show you I should be staying in that (England) 23.’”

Has Wigglesworth had to give Heyes a pep talk in recent weeks after getting overlooked by England? “He has not needed one. He has really got on with his work and been first-class in how he has taken it, as you would expect from a Leicester through-and-through player. He has been here a number of years. He is a young man for a tighthead but has played a lot of games for us and you can tell why.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search