Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The five moments that cost Scotland dearly against France

eferee, Nic Berry signals that the ball is held up as Sam Skinner of Scotland (obscured) attempts to score a try during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Scotland and France at BT Murrayfield Stadium on February 10, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Scotland’s chances for a potential Grand Slam disappeared following a heartbreaking 20-16 loss to France at Murrayfield after Sam Skinner was held up over the line on the final play.

ADVERTISEMENT

It felt like it was going to be Scotland’s day when Duhan van der Merwe made a try-saving tackle on Gael Fickou just metres from the line, before getting up and intercepting the ball from a questionable position.

What could have been a yellow card and penalty to France metres from the try line ended up a lineout back past halfway after Van der Merwe’s punt bounced perfectly over the sideline.

After building a 13-3 lead in the first half hour of play, Scotland were in a commanding position to start their campaign two from two and twist the knife into Dupont-less France.

Where did it all go wrong? How did they end up on the wrong side of the scoreline? Here are five moments that cost Scotland the most.

Matt Fagerson’s exit platform – 29th minute

Scotland had a couple of problems with isolated ball carriers, which you simply cannot have against the likes of Gregory Alldritt and co.

Immediately after Russell’s penalty goal to extend the lead to 13-3, Scotland failed to exit and turned the ball over leading to a French try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matt Fagerson was held up by Alldritt in a bear-strength tackle on the kick-off return. When France’s No 8 let him go, he smartly clattered into the supporting players, knocking over the cleaners. Fagerson isolated on the ground was picked off by Peato Mauvaka causing the ball to spill.

Lock Scott Cummings jumped on the loose ball, but he in turn became isolated and France won the ball back from another poacher. From that turnover, France constructed multiple phases and Gael Fickou’s try.

Whilst it was still very early in the match, it was an unnecessary and costly concession from a basic exit situation. They coughed up seven points just like that.

France may well have eventually scored a first-half try but they did not have to earn the territory to do so here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Game management in dying stages of first half – 40th minute

With a little over three minutes on the clock in the first half, Scotland turned down a shot at goal for a quick tap move from five metres out.

The set play did not work, they ran a switch play on third phase and Russell played an inside pass to Sione Tuipulotu which was gobbled up by France’s interior defence. After some settling phases, Scotland tried another backs’ release which was intercepted by Louis Bielle-Biarrey.

The silver lining was another penalty, this time from dead in front of the posts from five metres out. Prop Uini Atonio was yellow carded, giving Scotland a one-man advantage.

After rolling the dice once, they decided to roll it again on a scrum instead of taking the points, turning down the chance to make it 16-10.

Had Atonio not been sin-binned, they probably would have kicked the goal, but they were suckered into the lure of a one-man advantage.

They gambled and came up with nothing (see below) but were bailed out a third time by another penalty. After rolling the dice twice, a third was a stretch too far. They conceded a penalty before the feed on their own scrum.

After two failed attempts for a try, points would have been a good idea. A penalty goal would have essentially ended the half with less than a minute to play.

Considering they scored the first points of the second half through Russell’s boot, the game could have been 19-10 in Scotland’s favour had they taken three to end the first half.

Related

Huw Jones and Duhan van der Merwe’s execution blunder – 39th minute

Some blame must go on the decision to turn down points covered above, but the blame for failing to execute on the scrum play falls on Jones and Van der Merwe for blowing a walk-in try.

Scotland’s centre and wing got their wires crossed, with Jones front-running Van der Merwe and blocking his potential pass to a wide-open Kyle Rowe.

France had to substitute left winger Bielle-Biarrey for a prop to complete the scrum, leaving Rowe as the unmarked man.

Perhaps the play call was a bad one having Van der Merwe inject as the required playmaker – he isn’t renown for his passing. He ends up tackled and France hold on to end the half. The pass simply had to be made.

Scotland’s backs blew a walk-in try to Rowe (14) to potentially go up 20-10.

Kyle Rowe’s knock-on – 79th minute

Scotland’s right wing wasn’t given the chance at the end of the first half but he nearly became the hero at the end of the second.

After France had worked into a four point lead via a Ramos penalty late, Scotland had to make something happen with the clock winding down.

Up stepped Rowe. He scooped bad pass and zipped up the middle past no less than five French defenders into open pasture. He broke away downfield with just one problem: no support.

Unlikely to score himself, he tried an in-and-away on Ramos and was brought down by the trialling defence. He lost the ball once it hit the ground, spoiling a good opportunity for Scotland.

His 50-metre break went in vain. Despite not having any passing options, Scotland had players to secure the ruck. Had he held on, Scotland would have been hot on attack with France’s defence scrambling back.

That opportunity to attack was possibly better than the final barrage.

Sam Skinner held up – 81st minute

Say what you want about the held up call by Nic Berry and TMO’s decision to overturn it, but with the clock red and the game on the line Sam Skinner is not the player you want to give the ball.

If Scotland’s brain trust were to pick a player they want to have the ball from five metres out to win the game they would likely say Finn Russell or Duhan van der Merwe.

France’s defence had been shortened up following eighth phases of play on the goal line. Up to 11 French players are visible in the tight shot on the TV broadcast before Skinner is given the ball.

The space to the right hand side is likely on for any of Scotland’s backs to attack. Release the ball to Russell and let him make something happen.

Scotland have persisted with this red zone strategy for years which has barely paid dividends. Now it’s cost them a chance for a Grand Slam.

When Scotland beat France in 2021 in Paris after a game-winning try in the 84th minute, the pick-and-goes laid a platform during the final passage but did not get the result.

They played with width until Adam Hastings went over the top with a big cutout pass to Duhan van der Merwe. The strike weapon beat a couple of defenders by cutting inside and diving over to score.

Sam Skinner has not scored a try for Scotland in 31 Tests and unfortunately that hasn’t changed.

And no disrespect to the lock, but he is not a game-winner you want to give the ball to decide the game.

Related

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
G
Greg 312 days ago

No amount of platitude nonsense written by the bin juice supremo of rugby hacks can deflect from the fact that Scotland were, once again, cheated out of a victory by at best incompetence, but I fear worse, a non-articulated bias lying with officials who go out of their way to play to the advantage of larger unions. I do truly hope Berry and whoever the indecisive TMO were don’t cop the horrible online abuse we’ve seen reported in the past - But I do think they need a public dressing down by world rugby, or at least Townsend, for their reckless inability to do their job despite having an abundance of technology to do so. Alas, if fans see action being taken, they might want to stay fans of the sport and not becoming online trolls.

R
Rory 314 days ago

Puff piece by written by World Rugby to try and deflect from what was a complete collapse in the officiating process at the end. Oh and Ben Smith if you must write about the rules maybe read the rule book. DVM was onside for the interception as the ball was in open play as no ruck had been formed.

T
Tom 314 days ago

Blatantly a try at the end. I understand the logic behind the TMO decision but if you're not calling that conclusive evidence then why even bother going to the TMO? You could say with almost certainty that the ball was down. When you consider that most of the time the TMO is called in, you can't even see the ball. Having a situation where everyone is almost 100% sure the ball is grounded but not giving the try because the on field ref didn't get a view of it at the time is a farce.

But I'm sad to say it shouldn't have come down to a TMO decision. Scotland threw the game when they started trying to defend a 6 point lead for 30 mins against one of the best sides in the world. Scotland's strength is their attack, their attack, the way they were going to win is by scoring a lot of points, not by trying to stop the French - which in hindsight I'm sure they're all well aware of but I'm surprised Townsend didn't call it at the time, this Scotland team aren't normally afraid to throw the ball around but the prospect of beating the French and topping the table proved to be too much pressure.

C
Craig 314 days ago

I’m sure you all know but Rugby Pass ran a competition to see who could write the worst article and this one won. Congrats Ben

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search