Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The five moments that cost Scotland dearly against France

eferee, Nic Berry signals that the ball is held up as Sam Skinner of Scotland (obscured) attempts to score a try during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Scotland and France at BT Murrayfield Stadium on February 10, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Scotland’s chances for a potential Grand Slam disappeared following a heartbreaking 20-16 loss to France at Murrayfield after Sam Skinner was held up over the line on the final play.

ADVERTISEMENT

It felt like it was going to be Scotland’s day when Duhan van der Merwe made a try-saving tackle on Gael Fickou just metres from the line, before getting up and intercepting the ball from a questionable position.

What could have been a yellow card and penalty to France metres from the try line ended up a lineout back past halfway after Van der Merwe’s punt bounced perfectly over the sideline.

After building a 13-3 lead in the first half hour of play, Scotland were in a commanding position to start their campaign two from two and twist the knife into Dupont-less France.

Where did it all go wrong? How did they end up on the wrong side of the scoreline? Here are five moments that cost Scotland the most.

Matt Fagerson’s exit platform – 29th minute

Scotland had a couple of problems with isolated ball carriers, which you simply cannot have against the likes of Gregory Alldritt and co.

Immediately after Russell’s penalty goal to extend the lead to 13-3, Scotland failed to exit and turned the ball over leading to a French try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matt Fagerson was held up by Alldritt in a bear-strength tackle on the kick-off return. When France’s No 8 let him go, he smartly clattered into the supporting players, knocking over the cleaners. Fagerson isolated on the ground was picked off by Peato Mauvaka causing the ball to spill.

Lock Scott Cummings jumped on the loose ball, but he in turn became isolated and France won the ball back from another poacher. From that turnover, France constructed multiple phases and Gael Fickou’s try.

Whilst it was still very early in the match, it was an unnecessary and costly concession from a basic exit situation. They coughed up seven points just like that.

France may well have eventually scored a first-half try but they did not have to earn the territory to do so here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Game management in dying stages of first half – 40th minute

With a little over three minutes on the clock in the first half, Scotland turned down a shot at goal for a quick tap move from five metres out.

The set play did not work, they ran a switch play on third phase and Russell played an inside pass to Sione Tuipulotu which was gobbled up by France’s interior defence. After some settling phases, Scotland tried another backs’ release which was intercepted by Louis Bielle-Biarrey.

The silver lining was another penalty, this time from dead in front of the posts from five metres out. Prop Uini Atonio was yellow carded, giving Scotland a one-man advantage.

After rolling the dice once, they decided to roll it again on a scrum instead of taking the points, turning down the chance to make it 16-10.

Had Atonio not been sin-binned, they probably would have kicked the goal, but they were suckered into the lure of a one-man advantage.

They gambled and came up with nothing (see below) but were bailed out a third time by another penalty. After rolling the dice twice, a third was a stretch too far. They conceded a penalty before the feed on their own scrum.

After two failed attempts for a try, points would have been a good idea. A penalty goal would have essentially ended the half with less than a minute to play.

Considering they scored the first points of the second half through Russell’s boot, the game could have been 19-10 in Scotland’s favour had they taken three to end the first half.

Related

Huw Jones and Duhan van der Merwe’s execution blunder – 39th minute

Some blame must go on the decision to turn down points covered above, but the blame for failing to execute on the scrum play falls on Jones and Van der Merwe for blowing a walk-in try.

Scotland’s centre and wing got their wires crossed, with Jones front-running Van der Merwe and blocking his potential pass to a wide-open Kyle Rowe.

France had to substitute left winger Bielle-Biarrey for a prop to complete the scrum, leaving Rowe as the unmarked man.

Perhaps the play call was a bad one having Van der Merwe inject as the required playmaker – he isn’t renown for his passing. He ends up tackled and France hold on to end the half. The pass simply had to be made.

Scotland’s backs blew a walk-in try to Rowe (14) to potentially go up 20-10.

Kyle Rowe’s knock-on – 79th minute

Scotland’s right wing wasn’t given the chance at the end of the first half but he nearly became the hero at the end of the second.

After France had worked into a four point lead via a Ramos penalty late, Scotland had to make something happen with the clock winding down.

Up stepped Rowe. He scooped bad pass and zipped up the middle past no less than five French defenders into open pasture. He broke away downfield with just one problem: no support.

Unlikely to score himself, he tried an in-and-away on Ramos and was brought down by the trialling defence. He lost the ball once it hit the ground, spoiling a good opportunity for Scotland.

His 50-metre break went in vain. Despite not having any passing options, Scotland had players to secure the ruck. Had he held on, Scotland would have been hot on attack with France’s defence scrambling back.

That opportunity to attack was possibly better than the final barrage.

Sam Skinner held up – 81st minute

Say what you want about the held up call by Nic Berry and TMO’s decision to overturn it, but with the clock red and the game on the line Sam Skinner is not the player you want to give the ball.

If Scotland’s brain trust were to pick a player they want to have the ball from five metres out to win the game they would likely say Finn Russell or Duhan van der Merwe.

France’s defence had been shortened up following eighth phases of play on the goal line. Up to 11 French players are visible in the tight shot on the TV broadcast before Skinner is given the ball.

The space to the right hand side is likely on for any of Scotland’s backs to attack. Release the ball to Russell and let him make something happen.

Scotland have persisted with this red zone strategy for years which has barely paid dividends. Now it’s cost them a chance for a Grand Slam.

When Scotland beat France in 2021 in Paris after a game-winning try in the 84th minute, the pick-and-goes laid a platform during the final passage but did not get the result.

They played with width until Adam Hastings went over the top with a big cutout pass to Duhan van der Merwe. The strike weapon beat a couple of defenders by cutting inside and diving over to score.

Sam Skinner has not scored a try for Scotland in 31 Tests and unfortunately that hasn’t changed.

And no disrespect to the lock, but he is not a game-winner you want to give the ball to decide the game.

Related

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
G
Greg 281 days ago

No amount of platitude nonsense written by the bin juice supremo of rugby hacks can deflect from the fact that Scotland were, once again, cheated out of a victory by at best incompetence, but I fear worse, a non-articulated bias lying with officials who go out of their way to play to the advantage of larger unions. I do truly hope Berry and whoever the indecisive TMO were don’t cop the horrible online abuse we’ve seen reported in the past - But I do think they need a public dressing down by world rugby, or at least Townsend, for their reckless inability to do their job despite having an abundance of technology to do so. Alas, if fans see action being taken, they might want to stay fans of the sport and not becoming online trolls.

R
Rory 283 days ago

Puff piece by written by World Rugby to try and deflect from what was a complete collapse in the officiating process at the end. Oh and Ben Smith if you must write about the rules maybe read the rule book. DVM was onside for the interception as the ball was in open play as no ruck had been formed.

T
Tom 283 days ago

Blatantly a try at the end. I understand the logic behind the TMO decision but if you're not calling that conclusive evidence then why even bother going to the TMO? You could say with almost certainty that the ball was down. When you consider that most of the time the TMO is called in, you can't even see the ball. Having a situation where everyone is almost 100% sure the ball is grounded but not giving the try because the on field ref didn't get a view of it at the time is a farce.

But I'm sad to say it shouldn't have come down to a TMO decision. Scotland threw the game when they started trying to defend a 6 point lead for 30 mins against one of the best sides in the world. Scotland's strength is their attack, their attack, the way they were going to win is by scoring a lot of points, not by trying to stop the French - which in hindsight I'm sure they're all well aware of but I'm surprised Townsend didn't call it at the time, this Scotland team aren't normally afraid to throw the ball around but the prospect of beating the French and topping the table proved to be too much pressure.

C
Craig 284 days ago

I’m sure you all know but Rugby Pass ran a competition to see who could write the worst article and this one won. Congrats Ben

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search