Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The fixture that Eddie Jones never wants to see England play again

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Ex-England boss Eddie Jones exited Twickenham with a Sunday evening parting shot for the RFU. During his time in charge and before he took over from Stuart Lancaster for the 2016 Six Nations, the rugby authorities would annually pencil in an end-of-season match at HQ between England and the Barbarians.

ADVERTISEMENT

This tradition must have privately grated with Jones because, on the back of leading the Barbarians to their 48-42 Killik Cup victory over Steve Hansen’s World XV in a 14-try thriller, he took issue with the idea of England playing the Baa-Baas.

It was June last year when such a match-up was last held, Jones’ England charges getting humiliated 52-21 by a heavily influenced Barbarians side coached by Fabien Galthie.

Video Spacer

The Barbarians experience is second to none | Being Barbarians

Video Spacer

The Barbarians experience is second to none | Being Barbarians

That was very much an understrength England selection as the match took place on the same weekend at the Gallagher Premiership final between Saracens and Leicester, and numerous other Test squad front-liners were also absent as Jones rested them ahead of the tour to Australia.

It left his second-string England selection badly beaten and if that traditional fixture is ever to be revived against the Baa-Baas, Jones wants the RFU to start being more honest about it. “I can speak as a former England coach – I don’t think England should play the Barbarians unless it is a younger team.

Related

“At this time (of the year), you can never pick the England team so it shouldn’t be called England. It should be called England President’s 15 or something like that. Playing against the Barbarians is a great idea but to try to sell it as England is not honest it’s not honest.”

Jones would very much prefer the idea of Sunday’s Baa-Baas versus World XV concept being repeated given the calibre of crowd it attracted compared to your typical England game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Having a festival game like this at the end of the season, when it is all done and dusted, you had 33,000 and just walking around the crowd, I reckon 80 per cent were young kids.

“If we can inspire 20 per cent of those kids to play rugby, be rugby followers, then it is such a great vehicle to drive the game forward and it was on free-to-air TV, so a lot more people have got access to watch it. This is about building almost the culture of rugby, a game like this.”

Whereas 11 months ago he was left mugged as the England boss by Galthie’s far superior Barbarians, Jones basked in his role reversal this past week and was beaming that he has now also coached the world’s most famous invitational club to a Twickenham victory with a performance that very much exited.

“We wanted to win but we wanted to play good rugby. I felt the first half the quality of rugby was exceptional from both teams. Second half with the heat both teams got a little bit tired, but the first half particularly was well worth the price of a ticket,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

What did it feel like to be coaching back at Twickenham just six months after his final match in charge of England? “Fantastic. Sun shining, no overcoat on, no scarf on, just a shirt. Fantastic. Loved it.”

As for the memories of English Rugby HQ that his return stirred, he said: “Just good ones. Seven years here, it’s the longest I have ever coached a team. I loved every minute of coaching here, loved every minute of coming back.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search