Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The forgotten flyhalf of South African rugby

Curwin Bosch. Photo / Getty Images

With flyhalf Robert du Preez laying low after his recent stint in England, Curwin Bosch has been given a rare opportunity to show his worth in the No.10 jersey for the Sharks.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 21-year-old started at flyhalf for the Sharks against the Lions during the pre-season double-header in Cape Town and he has been given another opportunity in the same position for the warm-up against the Bulls in Ballito.

It means Bosch will almost certainly start against the Sunwolves in the Sharks’ Super Rugby opener in Singapore.

It will be an opportunity that Bosch will relish as he will probably be sent back to fullback for future matches – to make way for No.1 choice Du Preez.

Flyhalf is Bosch’s preferred position, but he has been used sparingly in that role over the last 12 months.

After being touted as a future star in that position for South Africa a few years ago, Bosch’s name does not even register on the Richter scale as a flyhalf candidate for the Springboks at the World Cup.

After joining the Sharks ahead of the 2016 season, Bosch showed his potential on a few occasions in the No.10 jersey, despite the naivety that comes with all young sportsmen.

ADVERTISEMENT

He made his Bok debut at the age of 20 off the bench under Allister Coetzee, in the 37-15 win over Argentina in Port Elizabeth 2017. However, Bosch still had a lot to learn and the weaknesses in his game – like defence and game management – were apparent.

His only other Test appearance was against Wales in Washington DC in 2018. He was a starter at fullback in that match.

Bosch was seen as a successor to the now-retired Patrick Lambie and when the latter announced that he was leaving the Sharks for Racing 92 in September 2017 – it looked like things were all falling in place for Bosch, to make the No.10 jersey his own.

However, inconsistent performances plagued the young pivot and then the Sharks decided to sign Du Preez from the Stormers (Western Province) ahead of the 2018 Super Rugby season.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Du Preez the preferred choice at No.10, Bosch spent most of his time at fullback in 2018.

The lack of game time at flyhalf meant Bosch has fallen down the pecking order when it comes to flyhalves vying for the Springboks’ No.10 jersey.

As it stands Handre Pollard, Elton Jantjies, Damian Willemse and Du Preez are all ahead of Bosch.

For a place at fullback, Bosch is competing with the likes of Willie le Roux, Warrick Gelant and Willemse, so his chances of making Rassie Erasmus’ World Cup squad later this year appears slim.

Bosch is still young, and he has a lot of rugby ahead of him, but he is quickly becoming the forgotten flyhalf of South African rugby.

By Warren Fortune @rugby365

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search