Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The full ref mic audio of what Joe Marler said to Jake Heenan

Joe Marler of Harlequins looks on as players from each team are separated after a brawl during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Harlequins and Bristol Bears at Twickenham Stoop Stadium on December 27, 2022 in London, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

A video with the audio of what Harlequins’ England prop Joe Marler said Jake Heenan has been published online.

ADVERTISEMENT

Marler was given a two-week ban for comments made to a Bristol Bears player while playing for his club

The 32-year-old Marler faced a Rugby Football Union (RFU) hearing on Friday over charges of making comments “prejudicial to the game” during Tuesday’s defeat by Bristol.

Video Spacer

Being Barbarians | Trailer

Video Spacer

Being Barbarians | Trailer

Below is a transcription of the exchange between Marler and Bristol back row Jake Heenan.

Jake Heenan: ‘Hey, brother, you’re better than that, hey?’

Joe Marler: ‘I’m not your brother. I’m clearly not your brother am I.’

Heenan: ‘You’re better than that mate’

Marler: ‘There’s no way I’m from the same mother as you. Your mother is a ****ing whore.

[players were audibly taken aback by comments. Heenan says something to the referee Karl Dickson about what Marler which sounds like ‘He said my mum was a whore to my face’]

Marler [again]: ‘Your mother’s a whore’

At this point the scuffle breaks out with some inaudible exchanges.

Referee Karl Dickson: ‘Who stared that?’

ADVERTISEMENT

Max Lahiff: ‘Marler called his mother a whore’.

Players continue to clash. 

Heenan: ‘My mum’s in hospital with cancer’

Referee Dickson: ‘Alex just take him back. Take him back. I know there was an allegation of what was said. I actually didn’t hear what was said. If it was really clear on the comms afterwards, it will be dealt with’.

Marler later apologised to Heenan over social media.

The England prop was given a six-week ban by the RFU, four of which were suspended. The loosehead will be available for the Six Nations which gets underway on February 5.

“The player accepted that his conduct was prejudicial to the interests of the game,” RFU panel chair Gareth Graham said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The insulting and offensive comments made by the player were wholly inappropriate; such comments should form no part of the modern game.”

Related

The panel also handed down an additional four-week ban suspended until the end of the 2023-24 season, which may be activated should Marler commit a similar offence.

“The panel also had regard to the player’s poor disciplinary record (as an aggravating feature) and to the fact he had accepted the charge and had apologised to the Bristol player (as mitigating factors),” Graham said.

Marler has a chequered disciplinary history.

In 2016 he called Wales prop Samson Lee ‘gypsy boy’, while in 2020 he was hit with a 10-week ban for grabbing the testicles of another Wales player, Alun Wyn Jones.

additional reporting AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search