Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The incredibly dangerous tactic the Wallabies got away with in win over All Blacks

The Wallabies. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

By Patrick McKendry, NZ Herald

When the All Blacks reviewed their defeat to Australia in Perth they would have been horrified by not only how many defensive errors and penalties they gave up which contributed to a big Bledisloe Cup setback, but also what the Wallabies got away with at the breakdown.

It was lawless – a throwback to the times before television match officials when anything went as long as the referee didn’t see it. Which begs the question; what exactly was TMO Marius Jonker watching throughout the Wallabies’ 47-26 Bledisloe Cup victory at Optus Stadium?

The Herald has counted at least 14 neck rolls by Wallabies players attempting to clear out All Black bodies at the breakdown, including an extremely obvious one by centre James O’Connor on Anton Lienert-Brown in the direct lead-up to Nic White’s try.

ADVERTISEMENT
Anton Lienert-Brown is neck rolled by James O’Connor. Photo / NZ Herald.
Lienert-Brown is caught in an awkward angle in O’Connor’s cleanout. Photo / NZ Herald.

Neck rolls – the act of grabbing an opposing player, whose attention is on the ball in the ruck, and twisting his head or neck to force him to the ground – are extremely dangerous and illegal. The minimum sanction is a yellow card, the maximum a red. Not one was penalised at Optus Stadium.

“This type of contact also applies to grabbing and rolling/twisting around the head/neck area even if the contact starts below the line of the shoulders,” according to World Rugby’s laws.

The allowance of the tactic put every player at risk last Saturday, but few would have disliked it more than Sam Cane, the All Blacks flanker who had surgery on a broken neck last year.

“To be honest, I wasn’t aware of it until I looked at my game yesterday but there were times when you’d get over the ball and you’d know you were in a good position and then for whatever reason you get taken off it,” he said today. “Sometimes it was because players were coming blatantly in from the side, sometimes it’s those neck rolls. I’m not sure there’s much you can do in the game.

“I remember at the 2015 World Cup there was a real clampdown on it. It was taken very seriously. It’s just one of those things; the laws of the game. They focus on one area and then another area seems to slip off. But I’d like to see it ruled.”

It was odd that the Wallabies should resort to such tactics because they have been extremely vocal opponents of it in the past, particularly when David Pocock has been on the receiving end.

Owen Franks was penalised by referee Wayne Barnes for wrenching Pocock’s neck in the Bledisloe Cup test at Eden Park 12 months ago, an act which left the loose forward injured and out of the return match in Sydney a fortnight later.

Wallabies skipper Michael Hooper said at the time: “We as a coaching group sent in clips to World Rugby and as far as we know — or the coaches have told me anyway — it doesn’t meet the red-card threshold.

“Now neck injuries are a pretty big part of the game and I know, from being in a similar position to David, you want to be protected and safe and that’s what this is about, player safety.”

Maybe it’s a case if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em, because the Wallabies’ ruck speed was mightily impressive at the weekend, the All Blacks saying afterwards they just couldn’t slow the home side’s ball. As Cane said, on review it became clearer why.

The All Blacks were magnanimous after the defeat, despite the red card for lock Scott Barrett in the final minute of the first half, and so they should have been, for they were outplayed and the Wallabies were dominant until Barrett’s departure.

They can probably accept the red card too because while Barrett made accidental contact with the back of Hooper’s head, the All Black had put himself in a compromised position by keeping his shoulder and arm low.

And while coach Steve Hansen called Ardie Savea’s push on the back of Hooper’s head shortly before that a “dumb act”, for referee Jerome Garces to penalise it shows a remarkable lack of empathy and feel for the game. Hooper pushed Savea in the back of the head by way of retaliation, a penalisable act in itself.

How Savea’s push merited a penalty, and the late tackle on Richie Mo’unga in the first half, which put him down for a considerable time, and Kurtley Beale’s shoulder charge on Jack Goodhue in the lead-up to Anton Lienert-Brown’s try, didn’t, beggars belief.

The same goes for the neck rolls because they are in no way accidental and they can’t be allowed to continue at Eden Park in the return match.

This article first appeared on nzherald.co.nz and was republished again with permission.

The Bill Ellis Podcast:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
Another 1 hour ago
Razor's 2024 All Blacks Christmas wish list

"It seems like the idea of Ardie Savea moving to openside flanker is no longer on the table"


Says who? Savea was picked on the open side, with Wallace Sititi at 8, against France. It makes no difference to Savea’s game, whatsoever and allows Sititi to play in his preferred position. It also provides an option to bring in a third loose forward that may provide a better lineout option and a big body to compete with some of the big bodies found in other teams.


It was unfortunate that Finau was injured so early on against France before he had a chance to show how he might combine with Savea and Sititi, and there is still a possibility that Hoskins Sotutu might be effective alongside them too.


Don’t count out viable options.

24 Go to comments
S
SK 13 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Bristol Bears announce raft of re-signings Bristol Bears announce raft of re-signings
Search