Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The rousing speech Rassie Erasmus gave South Africa bench while losing to England

Rassie Erasmus, Coach of South Africa leads a team talk as the players of South Africa form a huddle inside the South Africa dressing room following the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between England and South Africa at Stade de France on October 21, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Adam Pretty - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

The World Cup semi-final clash between South Africa and England was a tale of two benches.

ADVERTISEMENT

Almost every player that was brought on by Springboks head coach Jacques Nienaber and director of rugby Rassie Erasmus had a meaningful impact in the close encounter against England, while Steve Borthwick’s replacements were slightly less effective.

Fly-half Handre Pollard has stolen the headlines for his match-winning penalty, but the loosehead and tighthead combination of Ox Nche and Vincent Koch have also received a lot of credit for blitzing the opponents’ scrum in the final quarter, while lock RG Snyman scored the all too important try with ten minutes to go.

Video Spacer

WATCH as Springbok assistant coach Felix Jones talks about the mood in the camp ahead of their World Cup Final face-off with the All Blacks

Video Spacer

WATCH as Springbok assistant coach Felix Jones talks about the mood in the camp ahead of their World Cup Final face-off with the All Blacks

Another member of the Springboks’ match-winning bench, flanker Kwagga Smith, has grown familiar with the role over the past four years and has become a vital member of the fabled ‘Bomb Squad’.

Ahead of the final this week, the 30-year-old discussed the responsibility and importance of the South African bench. He said: “Since 2019 the bench has had a massive impact with the Springboks so it’s something that’s been building up for years now. When we are on the bench we know we have a responsibility to fulfil.

Related

“Playing in the final we know it’s going to be 80 minutes, maybe it might go to 100 minutes, you never know. You know you’ve got to be ready and make sure you use your opportunity when you get it.”

Rarely during the tenure of Erasmus and Nienaber has the bench had such a vital role to play in the result than it did in the semi-final win over England, as the world champions were trailing at half-time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith outlined what Erasmus said to the bench during during the break of that match as he proceeded to unleash the bench in the opening minutes of the second stanza.

“For the England game he told us on bench before the game that it’s going to be a massive one,” Smith said.

“At half-time he just said to us, ‘listen, this is your game to win, it doesn’t help to wait for someone else, this is the bench’s time to go up and make a difference’.”

It only took eleven minutes after the second-half whistle before the entire bench was called upon, except Koch who had to wait a further five minutes. Erasmus’s speech clearly had a profound impact on the eight players as they steered the Boks to the World Cup final against the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
B
Bob Marler 390 days ago

Something about inches.

B
Bob Marler 390 days ago

“Better not lose.”

B
Bob Marler 390 days ago

“Play your absolute best please.” ?

B
Bob Marler 390 days ago

“Go! Win!” ?

E
Efraim 391 days ago

What speech are you talking about?

J
John 392 days ago

Josh, go look again. He didn't bring them all on at the same time except for Kock. They were brought on individually during English set pieces, disturbed the whole England flow by having clock off each time and then having to wait for the replacement, took Eben 45 seconds to get swopped out for RG.

H
Hans 392 days ago

Please, for the love of God, stop clickbaiting your audience with headlines that promise far more than what the article offers. With a bit more focus on quality this website can be really stunning. Unfortunately, you’re letting yourself and all your readers down with this nasty habit of overselling your content.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh
Search