Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The latest Sale update on the Manu Tuilagi contract saga

(Photo by Bob Bradford/CameraSport via Getty Images)

Sale boss Alex Sanderson believes only a last-gasp offer from France or Japan can stop Manu Tuilagi from signing a new deal to stay in England – a move that would prove Gallagher Premiership clubs can hold onto their marquee players despite the salary cap.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sanderson has been playing the long ball game with the England centre and after admitting they gave an initial “insulting” offer to Tuilagi, it appears that Sale are now tantalising close to agreeing to a new deal having found more money to pay their highest profile player.

It was two weeks ago, ahead of midweek contract negotiations over a steak lunch in Lymm, that Sanderson explained to RugbyPass his increased optimism that Tuilagi would stick with Sale. “We want him, he wants to stay,” said Sanderson at the time.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“We had no money, then we had a bit of money and now we have got twice as much money than we did have. I’m going to Lymm to sit down with him to see if it’s enough. I know he wants to stay, so this is just a question of whether his family can survive on it and how much he is willing to sacrifice. I guess I will be buying lunch.”

With that lunch meeting over and Sale set to renew their Premiership title bid with this Friday’s trip to Bristol, Sanderson now believes only a mega 11th-hour bid from France or Japan could ruin all of the time he has spent helping to convince Tuilagi to remain in England.

“I am happy to tell you that everything is positive (on Manu) and close. I can’t confirm as yet but it is more positive and closer than it has ever been. Everyone knows that until the cat is in the bag and your chickens have fully hatched, you can’t call it with retention or recruitment – but all the signs are good.

“Manu wants to stay. It was pretty hopeless, but where there is a will and things have happened that weren’t in our control months ago that have allowed us to come back to the table. But until it’s done, people come in as always – the French are late to offer contracts and Japan also. Given the curve balls I have faced in the past, you just can’t put away one of those outlying factors that can affect what we want to happen.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is really close. It is in the laps of agents and if it was my decision and you could take agents out of it, then it would have been done weeks ago. I want it done quicker and so does Manu, but it is in the corporate ether.”

Meanwhile, Tom Curry is set to make his comeback following his Guinness Six Nations training ground injury with England. “I have had a few short conversations with Tom.

“The injury is the same injury but on the other leg from what he had pre the Six Nations, so he understands the loading aspect and what he needs to come back in form – which he did against Northampton, he was brilliant. There is a high expectation, but he is a great player and he puts that on himself.”

Dan du Preez will also be involved after he opted to delay a shoulder operation and instead complete the season with the injury strapped. “Dan has loose ligaments in his shoulder and he still needs an operation but has chosen to play which shows you the type of man he is.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 14 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search