Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The legendary Jonathan Davies slams 'scandalous position' in Wales

(Photo by Andy Buchanan/AFP via Getty Images)

Welsh rugby legend Jonathan Davies has slammed the situation in Wales that has led to the threatened players’ strike for next weekend’s Guinness Six Nations match versus England. Failure to fulfil the February 25 game could cost the WRU upwards of £9million in much-needed revenue as it grapples with a financial crisis it is nowhere near solving.

ADVERTISEMENT

No contracts are currently on the table for players at the four regions whose deals expire at the end of the 2022/23 season and the situation has now turned nuclear with the national team considering whether to play next weekend or give the match with England a miss.

The latest development in the controversy came on Tuesday when the WRU called off its planned 12-noon announcement of the Wales team to play England.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

That denied the union the opportunity to switch the narrative onto selection and on-pitch matters and temporarily move away from all the negative headlines surrounding contracts and this Wednesday’s scheduled meeting between the WRU’s professional rugby board and the Welsh professional players.

It’s a standoff that the legendary Davies doesn’t like. His gut feeling is that the Six Nations match will eventually go ahead but he is dismayed that the sport has fallen into such disrepair. Appearing on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod, he quipped: “I’m glad I have retired with all this hassle going on.”

Related

Asked for the inside track as to what is happening behind the scenes in Wales, Davies continued: “I don’t think anyone knows unless you are around the table and I’m not. It’s a serious threat, a well-timed threat really. It [Wales versus England] is the biggest earner for the WRU, the players know that. How that is going to have a knock-on effect if the game doesn’t go on to the regions and their finances I’m not sure but I just feel it is a decision they all came to and they had to do it.

“It’s a scandalous position to be in. You can’t expect players to perform when they have been promised finances to be sorted. It was pre-Christmas or whatever and it is still the situation. It was highlighted by Jack Dixon of the Dragons. He went off injured and he is up for contract renewal His confidence must be shattered and he is worried because who is going to sign a guy who is injured? It makes it harder.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They are serious about it and hopefully they can all get around a table and get it sorted ASAP. Everybody wants the game to go ahead and I’m sure all the players would but unfortunately, they have been caught up in a situation. It’s not a great reflection on Welsh rugby and the WRU and they have had a disastrous last couple of months.”

Davies believes the Test match will ultimately happen but he has called for total reform of rugby in Wales. “It will go on. Gut feeling is everybody wants it to happen. Hopefully, this will be put to bed… But you have got to have a business plan.

“The regions have got to know where they are, the players have got to know where they are and we have always been told, just concentrate on your rugby. That is what the players want to do but they can’t do it because of the financial situation.

“The problem is the union doesn’t trust the regions, the regions don’t trust the union and I don’t think the regions trust each other. That has always been an issue and if you have got five parts to this, they should work in harmony for everyone to get better because they need the grassroots, they need the regions, and then all of a sudden you have got Wales. For me, it’s the union’s fault that it has come to this.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They had to try and nail it down ASAP. I can understand that maybe the regions have squandered the money. I do think that across the board now, not only in Wales, they have got to look at player salaries,” reckoned Davies.

“When you have got clubs like Wasps and Worcester going through and then Leicester needing a cash injection, it’s not sustainable. They have got to look at contracts and players will go, ‘Why are we taking a cut?’ Because for the longevity of the game they have to and they have to be realistic about salaries.

“I don’t know how that is going to work… but what they need first and foremost is trust between the lot of them. I don’t even know what (Warren) Gatland is going to be doing. Is he staying, is he going to be a rugby director? What influence is he going to have over the regions? The regions won’t want him to come in because he is a union rep.

“So this is an opportunity to have total reform, on finances, on the rugby, on the culture in the WRU. You need a CEO to run the business and either a CEO or a director of rugby to run the rugby because we have been failing the youngsters. I am looking at it now and we haven’t got strength in depth and I do blame coaching at the lower level.

“When you get to regional standard you shouldn’t have to be taught how to pass or how to kick, which tackle to use in a tackle. We have failed the youngsters coming through as well because we neglected the finances at grassroots and age-group rugby.”

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 3 hours ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’, needing to include even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is one of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of any one clubs amount of players in their International camps, where they rotate in other clubs players through the week (those not chosen in the 23 on Tues/Wed must be rotated out with players from another club for the remaining weeks prep). The number of ‘invisible’ games against a players season tally or predicted workload suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23 were eligible.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season, but ultimately if they don’t want it to change they can just play 11 months in the season instead.

72 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Erasmus invites 3 U20 stars into Bok squad as multiple RWC winners miss out Erasmus names 3 U20 stars in Bok squad as many RWC winners miss out