Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Leinster red card reaction and why they turned down kick at goal

(Photo by Anne Christine Poujoulat/AFP via Getty Images)

Vanquished Leinster have shared their thoughts on why they turned down the opportunity to kick at the Aviva Stadium posts from long distance when trailing by a point with five minutes remaining in their agonising 26-27 defeat to La Rochelle.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Irish side were awarded a 75th-minute penalty five metres in from the touchline on the 10-metre line after Jonathan Danty was yellow-carded for his high tackle on Caelan Doris to make it a 14-versus-14 contest just minutes after the home team’s Ronan Kelleher had been carded for a maul collapse during the lead-taking converted La Rochelle try.

However, instead of going for goal and the glory off the tee, Leinster decided that Ross Byrne should instead kick possession into touch in the 22 and that they would attack from there.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

That try-searching tactic nearly paid rich dividends, Leo Cullen’s team massively pressuring the La Rochelle defence, but their momentum was killed when Michael Ala’alatoa was red-carded on 78 minutes for his shoulder-to-head contact with Georges-Henri Colombe at a ruck just metres from the try line. That left the match finishing with just 27 players on the pitch, 13 for Leinster and 14 for La Rochelle.

When Danty was yellow carded and the opportunity was there for Byrne to kick what could potentially have been the cup-winning points, he was four from six off the kicking tee for his afternoon’s work – his two misses coming from near-touchline conversions that hit an upright on both occasions in the first half.

Related

Asked about the chat that led to Byrne going down the line rather than taking his chances with a kick at the posts, Garry Ringrose, who had assumed the Leinster captaincy following the 30th-minute departure of the injured James Ryan, said: “With regards to Ross, it’s always an option there and I would have 100 per cent trust in his feeling on the spot.

“We have seen him in big games get kicks from there, so I trust his gut on that. We backed ourselves in the decision we made.”

ADVERTISEMENT

As for the subsequent breakdown incident that had referee Jaco Peyper reaching for the red card to dismiss Ala’alatoa for his illegal contact with Colombe, the player the sub prop couldn’t prevent from getting over the try line at the other end of the pitch on 71 minutes, Leinster boss Cullen remarked: “I’ll have to look back on it in more detail. You have got to just trust the referee’s call on the day.

“You know, it’s at the end of the game, I don’t know. I’ll have to look back on it, but I didn’t dwell too much on it in terms of studying the footage more.

“It was more ‘let’s try and put a plan together’ before the card even came out. I was getting a sense from the conversation that we needed to make an alternative plan, so I was more focused that at the time.”

The one-point loss for Leinster came 12 months after they were beaten by a three-point margin by the same La Rochelle opposition in Marseille. It hurt, but Cullen insisted his team won’t give up trying to win its fifth European title and a first since 2018. “It was an unbelievably tight game,” he reflected.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Great occasion, amazing out there in terms of the atmosphere and everything else. The dressing room in there is pretty gutted as you can imagine because it means so much to the players, everyone has worked incredibly hard to get to this point and so, so close, unbelievably close.

“We started the game really well, lots of really positive things in the first half. On the flip side of that, second half even though we came up with some good turnovers in our end of the field we didn’t exit that well, so it just means we were feeding La Rochelle, they kept a lot of possession, territory that second half.

Related

“Tight margins, they managed to get over the try line at the end this time last year. We are in that situation this year and we can’t get over the line. That’s how close it is. It has come down to the finest of margins on both days and unfortunately, on both sides of it, we just haven’t been good enough to do it. We just need our guys to stay at it, keep believing they will get there.

“There are things that guys will look back at with regret but unfortunately but it wasn’t to be today, but the big thing is not to lose heart. We are so close to it and we came up against a very, very good team.

“You have got to give them [La Rochelle] a huge amount of credit. They stuck at it after the start that they had and the character they showed to come back. You have got to give them a huge amount of credit. It’s devastating really. We went through that final where we went through being 16 points down in the past (versus Northampton in 2011), so I know what that feeling of jubilation is like.

“Now we are experiencing the other side of it where the players have built a big lead, 23-7 in the first half, and they get in for a try just before half-time. That is what you are going to get, it’s the top-end of the game we are operating at here.

“Up against a good team, well drilled, very good individual players, a slightly different model, the top Top 14 in terms of where they pull players from all around the globe.

“We have a bunch of guys that came through the system here for the most part and we have just got to stay at it. Just got to stay at it. Keep believing in what they do, working hard every day, keep pushing each other along. They will be back.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 32 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search