Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Lions have stacked the backline with height for an aerial showdown

(Photo By Ashley Vlotman/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

There really isn’t much between the Springboks and the Lions based on the first test, tactically or otherwise.

ADVERTISEMENT

They both had similar plans, there wasn’t any noticeable dominance by anyone at scrum time, with the Springboks conceding two penalties to the Lions’ one. The Lions won 80 per cent of their 16 lineouts, the Springboks only had four throws of their own.

With parity at set-piece, the Springboks’ loss came down to execution, with a failure to manage the aerial assault in the second half allowing the Lions to gain ascension and territorial control.

Video Spacer

Warren Gatland explains his selections for the second test

Video Spacer

Warren Gatland explains his selections for the second test

Had they not lost so many high balls, it is unlikely the Lions even get back in the game and the questionable offside call on Willie le Roux isn’t a talking point, or Hamish Watson’s tip tackle.

Kwagga Smith was pressured into many mistakes in the second half in the backfield. Makazole Mapimpi and Elton Jantjies chipped in with a couple more.

Cheslin Kolbe, normally a reliable pair of hands, wasn’t able to diffuse many of the Lions high balls in the second half under pressure from the likes of the taller Van der Merwe, Robbie Henshaw and Watson.

It wasn’t for lack of trying, as the smaller Kolbe routinely made incredible leaps to make up for the height disadvantage. The Lions themselves didn’t bring down the ball, but they did interfere with the catch, with hands in the way leading to a 50-50 spill.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sometimes it was a knock-on, sometimes the Lions got it back. Either way the Springboks weren’t able to secure the ball and when the bounce went against them, it lead to huge momentum swings to enable the Lions to get back into the game after being down 12-3.

The Springboks have made changes as a result of their aerial malfunction, going with Jasper Wiese at 8 instead of Smith and they have gone back to a 6-2 split on the bench, just relying on Damian Willemse for coverage across the outside backs with Elton Jantjies missing out.

The Lions have gone for more height in the backs for the second test, leaving Josh Adams out for the second time in favour of the 6’3 Van der Merwe while replacing Elliot Daly with the 6’2 Chris Harris.

With Dan Biggar and Anthony Watson at 6’2 and Henshaw at 6’1, the Lions appear to be doubling down on height through the backs in order to keep pressuring the Springboks in the air.

ADVERTISEMENT

The smallest height wise, Stuart Hogg, is well established as an aerial specialist and possesses an incredibly valuable long punt from the back.

It must have been a 50-50 call to keep Daly on the bench over Liam Williams, with Daly’s long-range goal kicking perhaps giving him the edge. Although he missed his only chance in the first test, if the Lions need a late penalty goal from distance he could be on the field.

Gatland admitted they are expecting a bombardment when he spoke at his mid-week press conference of what would be a ‘ferocious kicking battle’ in the second test. This is how both teams want to play and so this is how the series will be decided. It will be who breaks first and concedes more.

Although, the Lions themselves will need a better showing in the air on defence as they struggled to diffuse many of the Springboks kicks.

It was a failure to take a Willie le Roux bomb in the first place that created the opportunity for his no try. The De Allende no try brought back from a Kolbe knock-on came from a spilled Faf de Klerk box kick.

These opportunities were coming from the Lions’ own inability to secure possession in the air, and only luck prevented them from paying the price that the Boks did.

The Springboks generated slightly more contestable kicks than the visitors, 18 to 17, but the Lions got the better results when it came to regaining possession and then turning those swings into points.

A key man from the first test, Ali Price, will also make way for Conor Murray in the run-on side, a change made in order to get control of the first half an hour that was missing for the Lions in the first test.

“They try and build the scoreboard, they try and get the front and hold on. That first twenty to thirty minutes is pretty important to us,” Gatland said of the decision to elevate Murray.

Price was instrumental in the second half with his box kicking, but also brings energy and tempo that might be better utilised when the game opens up. However, Murray’s box kicking will need to be on target with little room for error to match what Price was able to do.

The second test will bring more intensity and an emotional charge from a Springbok side fighting to stay alive in the series, but again, it will be decided in the air as both sides know this is the way to open each other up.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat
Search