Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'low-percentage play' that could have been the difference for the Crusaders

David Havili. (Photo by John Davidson/Photosport)

The Crusaders held firm to beat the Highlanders 17-14 on Friday evening despite having to make more than twice as many tackles as their opposition in Christchurch.

ADVERTISEMENT

For the second time in three matches, the Crusaders found themselves starved on possession in the final quarter, having to repel wave after wave of attack. Against the Chiefs three weekends ago, their walls eventually came down in the final five minutes, conceding two quick tries to cede an 11-point lead and go down 21-24.

Thankfully for coach Scott Robertson, the same didn’t eventuate on Saturday night with his charges managing to disrupt possession before the Highlanders were ever able to get much of a roll on. Despite that, however, a single penalty kick in the second half could have taken the game to extra time but Highlanders pivot – and former Crusader – Mitch Hunt couldn’t quite find his mark early in the spell from a handy position.

Video Spacer

Are the Brumbies the team to beat in Super Rugby Pacific?

Video Spacer

Are the Brumbies the team to beat in Super Rugby Pacific?

“I mentioned it through the week and we talked about it, our efforts and what was gonna be required because they were desperate and a lot of it was true,” Robertson said following the match. “They were desperate, they were hungry and they had opportunities to win that many times.

“You don’t often see Hunty miss those kicks. Go to 17-all, [it would be] a different game. But we hung in there and that’s what you’ve gotta do to win comps.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass)

On the flip side, Richie Mo’unga nailed all three of his attempts on goal, including what eventually turned out to be a crucial 26th-minute penalty. With the scores so close, the Crusaders even attempted to land a long-range right on half-time but David Havili couldn’t quite convert the opportunity. Still, Robertson had no qualms with the tactic.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re really pleased [about Mo’unga’s penalty goal]. That’s why we gave Davey one as well,” Robertson said. “It was probably a pretty low-percentage play but if he nails it, we’re running six points up and then if you score again [ you’re a try clear].

“With the grease on the pitch, playing from behind is tough, we’ve done it ourselves, so it’s good to be in front and have a buffer.”

Said “grease” came courtesy of a sudden shower hitting shortly before kick-off, which meant an expansive game wasn’t necessarily out of the question, but it was always going to be difficult to execute. Despite the Crusaders hammering the message home during the week that a strong start was imperative after the Highlanders had built a 13-0 lead in the previous outing between the two sides, Robertson was less than impressed with the opening quarter, when the Crusaders were again put under pressure and conceded the opening try.

“We talked about having a good start and we didn’t,” Robertson said. “[We] played from behind.

“They put the sprinklers on. [The pitch] dried as we were warming up and it just sort of took away a little bit of ball-in-play which both teams love to do.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We put pressure on ourselves as much as they put on with the lineouts, losing the kick battles and aerial battles. We went back to relying on our defence in critical times and winning some critical moments. We’re pleased but not satisfied.”

Related

As was the case against the Chiefs, when the Crusaders did eventually get hold of the pill they weren’t able to build any pressure of their own, coughing it up and handing attacking ball back to their opposition. At one stage in the second half, after enduring a slew of Highlanders strikes, the Crusaders were able to force their way into the opposition 22 but quickly turned over possession when replacement halfback Bryn Hall bobbled the ball at the base of the ruck.

“[The errors] just compounded, put [pressure] on us,” Robertson said. “We just put pressure back on ourselves so we can’t actually execute the little things right up their end.

“We defended for what felt like 20 minutes. Got up the other end, [then there was a] little knock-on. Bryn, he’ll be gutted with that because we were just putting pressure on them.”

While the Highlanders certainly came closer to landing a killer blow – with Hunt missing a regulation kick to the corner to go with his mis-struck penalty – the Crusaders ultimately held strong and can now move on to the next challenge – although they’ll almost certainly have to do it without reserve hooker Shilo Klein, who was rightly sent from the field after making a dangerous tackle on All Blacks front-rower Ethan de Groot.

The Crusaders are set to take on the Hurricanes in Wellington next weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search